Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.
tDCS thread
#301
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:57 PM
I got quite a knock back from some company today who, for whatever reason, will not sell outside of the "professional" world. Guess they don't have a need for a wider market, which is a fucking shame. Still as a result I do feel I'd like to try harder to get a tRNS machine and have more focal HD electrodes.
Right now I'm running off of a rather highly stimulated left dlpfc and parietal lobes (l and r) - I found calculations to be faster as a result!
Would prefer not to be either inhibiting other parts or wearing a chin pad when doing it!!
#302
Posted 18 May 2013 - 05:21 PM
I'm currently using the anode over F3
UPDATE.
I'm currently using the anode over F3 and cathode supra-orbital to right eyebrow. It's 18 minutes into this session and I accidentally switched cathod and anode with the above areas and felt really off. Now that I got the setup correctly placed at the correct polarities I feel very "awake". Just without any jitteriness.
sponsored ad
#303
Posted 18 May 2013 - 08:29 PM
Edited by yadayada, 18 May 2013 - 08:29 PM.
#304
Posted 19 May 2013 - 11:48 AM
Anodal stim of the left AND right parietal is a good plan for your maths.
Left temporal and broca for linguistics.
Right temporal, anterior for visual recognition etc
left dlpfc association/working memory/concentration etc avoid right (right handed people) anodal because that is avoidance behaviours and feels not so nice.
#305
Posted 24 May 2013 - 11:00 AM
#306
Posted 25 May 2013 - 10:06 AM
Gave someone minor savant style experience, inhibit left temporal, excite right, ten mins 2mA. Interesting abstracts he drew. Very fast.
#307
Posted 26 May 2013 - 06:10 AM
Hi, I'm currently using the tDCS placement setup with the cathode on FP2 and anode on F3. Can someone please tell me if this setup enhances or inhibits mathematical reasoning. I'm thinking it may inhibit mathematical reasoning because the right pariental lobe is being inhibited? Can someone list the different sponge placements for math, reasoning, depression, and working memory. Appreciate it. Thanks.
Dude let us know how this works insofar as math. Are you doing right to left brain parietal stim?
BTW why did you go with this device? I saw some kids make a $99.00 somewhere but I lost it b/c I was in an exam crunch.
#308
Posted 26 May 2013 - 06:18 AM
I'ts really strange with math. For everything else the FP2 cathode and F3 cathode setup works really well. When it comes to math I don't know how to describe it. It's too early;but, the feeling is that you get stuck in a mindset with the FP2 and F3 setup that doesn;t work well with thinking in new ways or having those "aha" moments that you need when understanding math problems. Don't know if that means anything. You just become more good at what you already do with the FP2 F3 setup; but, it's harder to shift to new learned material or stuff like that. There were some studies showing something along these lines mentioned on tdcs reedit I think.Hi, I'm currently using the tDCS placement setup with the cathode on FP2 and anode on F3. Can someone please tell me if this setup enhances or inhibits mathematical reasoning. I'm thinking it may inhibit mathematical reasoning because the right pariental lobe is being inhibited? Can someone list the different sponge placements for math, reasoning, depression, and working memory. Appreciate it. Thanks.
Dude let us know how this works insofar as math. Are you doing right to left brain parietal stim?
BTW why did you go with this device? I saw some kids make a $99.00 somewhere but I lost it b/c I was in an exam crunch.
#310
Posted 26 May 2013 - 06:30 AM
This is kind of worrying. I think I might just stick with the FP2 cathode and F3 anode setup until there's more research.
One interesting things about the FP2 cathode setup. I was interested in Lucid dreaming some time back but gave up on all the time that had to be put with the Reality checking and dream journals. What's interesting is that when I was all into lucid dreaming I found out Brodmann area 46 is responsible for lucid dreaming. Broadmanns area 46 is deactivated during sleep. Brodmann area 46 is the DLPFC and when I was doing the FP2 cathode F3 anode detup the first day I noticed some of the most intense dreams in a long time. Everything was really realistic as if I did a bunch of RC's and keept a dream journal for a long time. Was a cool side effect; but, I'm not into that stuff anymore.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brodmann_area_46
#311
Posted 26 May 2013 - 06:40 AM
#312
Posted 27 May 2013 - 03:13 PM
#313
Posted 11 June 2013 - 01:35 AM
http://www.biocurren...biocurrent-kit/
#314
Posted 11 June 2013 - 02:58 AM
#315
Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:08 AM
Its the last 15 minutes of the subconscious episode.
I found a USB TDCS for only 25 dollars.
http://tdcs-kit.com/
Found that website just in time.. I was about to give up and buy foc.us for 300 dollars.
#316
Posted 14 June 2013 - 11:29 PM
It's 30 bucks btw.
I wonder if you can adjust the current going through the usb to change it.
Edited by jayfoxpox, 14 June 2013 - 11:31 PM.
#317
Posted 20 June 2013 - 10:03 AM
Wondering what would work to keep the things in place?
String? Tape? String/tape safe?
#318
Posted 20 June 2013 - 06:42 PM
Btw, I had ordered one from foc.us before which I cancelled and at first there didn't seem to be any problems as they said they would give me a refund at once. Got a confirmation from PayPal as well, however this confirmation was empty and when checking my bank account one week later they still hadn't refunded my money. First after complaining and threatening with measures they sent me the money but they were acting as if they had given me the refund from the beginning, sending me screenshots from their PayPal account with a note that did not correspond with the one that was in the confirmation I got.
I don't know, maybe they're all cool and there will be no hustle but seems kind of fishy to me, so at least I'd advice you to be wary if you've ordered from them..
#319
Posted 22 June 2013 - 07:03 PM
Gave someone minor savant style experience, inhibit left temporal, excite right, ten mins 2mA. Interesting abstracts he drew. Very fast.
Could you expand on this in some more detail? I think I may want to try it out myself. What sort of things was he drawing? Could you post a picture of it? What was his skill in drawing beforehand? Have you tried this on yourself? etc. etc.
#320
Posted 28 June 2013 - 07:16 PM
Edited by hlgaskins, 28 June 2013 - 07:54 PM.
#321
Posted 28 June 2013 - 10:19 PM
#322
Posted 28 June 2013 - 11:20 PM
It's important to monitor resistance and mA output, because a change in resistance is a change in electrical output. If your sponge electrode begins to dry then it can limit (impede) how much voltage passes through the circuit and ergo how much enters your head. The higher the impedance the lower the current output which could mean that your output may not be optimal which happesn more often than you might imagine. Also if the salinity of your saline solution is either high or low it has the potential to raise or lower resistance which turn raises or lowers current. I measure my saline solution using an electronic scale that accurate to miligrams to get things right on and even then I get variations in resistance. I have no doubt that your experience with TDCS has benefited you and I applaud you for taking things into your own hands. My purpose is however for personal enhancement as well as finding a means to enhance people with learning disabilities. In your case I would suggest that you lower your current to 2.0 mA and increase your times to 25 or even 30 minutes. There is no evidence that a higher current offers benfits but there strong evidence to suggest that 2.0 mA treatments for 30 minutes are effective. HLG
#323
Posted 03 July 2013 - 01:05 AM
#324
Posted 03 July 2013 - 01:23 AM
#325
Posted 03 July 2013 - 02:12 AM
#326
Posted 03 July 2013 - 03:11 AM
Not true! Purified water alone has no conductivity whatsoever, it's the minerals in water that allow current flow. In many areas tap water is mineral rich which could make it too conductively rich, but to what degree? And how can you factor the resistance to current flow if you don't know the impedance to current ratio? Electrical current fluctuates up or down depending on impedance. If the impedance is too low then the current could be too high and if the impedance is too high then the current could be too low which renders the treatment ineffective. With many homemade tDCS devices it's virtually impossible to track resistance and current flow unless the device can be set to adjust resistance to current on the fly. By creating a measure of water to mineral content, it's possible to at least calculate the resistance within a reasonable degree of error. There's a reason why 100% of all tDCS researchers use a demineralized solvent (distilled water) and salt to obtain consistently in conductivity.
Saline makes all the difference if you want to create a controlled circuit.
Edited by hlgaskins, 03 July 2013 - 03:13 AM.
#327
Posted 04 July 2013 - 03:23 PM
#328
Posted 04 July 2013 - 07:02 PM
The resistance on my meter rises as my sponge becomes dryer. My goal is to try to keep reistance around 4kohms (but it often drops below 3Kohms) and over time it can rise to 5.5kohms. Without the unit being able to compensalte for resistance this is what would happen. Using an online calculator I got: At 3kohms we get 6000V and 2.0mA (16000 watts), at 2kohms we get 6000V and 3.0mA (too high) (12000 watts), at 4kohms we get 6000V and 1.5mA (9000 watts) (too low), At 5kohms we get 6000V and (7200 watts)1.2 mA. The only number manipulated was resistance and as you can see as resitance is lowered the current "I" rises along with wattage but there was no change in voltage whatsover.
Edited by hlgaskins, 04 July 2013 - 07:23 PM.
#329
Posted 04 July 2013 - 07:06 PM
http://www.stevenswa...ivity_info.html
sponsored ad
#330
Posted 05 July 2013 - 11:07 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users