They are not equivalent. Fullerenols are hydrophilic while fullerenes are hydrophobic, resulting in different effects on mito mebranes. While fullerene C60 appears to reduce the loss of H+, at least one fullerenol appears to increase it, resulting in toxicity--
Turnbuckle, you talked about the toxicity of fullerenols.
However, in other studies, many positive effects of fullerenols are mentioned:
https://www.hindawi....i/2013/751913/
https://www.scienced...005273613001557
http://www.thno.org/v02p0238.htm
PQQ is probably all right but I haven't used it yet with this. As for MitoQ, I'm surprised that anyone would use it after the recent evidence of its toxicity.
Turnbuckle, you also wrote about MitoQ
But... MitoQ "makes old blood vessels seem young again":
https://www.scienced...80419141523.htm
SkQ1 differs from MitoQ only in that it has a shorter molecule.
The principle is the same. But ... he cures cataracts, and also gives a huge amount of energy (according to Academician Skulachev, who takes it)
Water "svetla" also gave me a lot of energy.
---
Now the question is:
Oil "C60evoo" or "C60mct+HT" also attracts "HT" - that is, the fullerene concentrates around the OH group.
It turns out a molecule that slightly resembles fullerenol
Perhaps the molecule formed also destabilizes the membrane?