Right, the big attraction of the keto mojo for me initially was the < $1/strip price on keto strips.
My impression is that the market for these glucose meters was overwhelmingly for those with T2D just trying to know if they should shoot up more insulin to get their glucose in the sane range:
Current ADA guidelines call for achieving HbA1C levels of less than 7.0%; this corresponds to an average blood sugar level below 154 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The ADA also recommends striving for fasting blood sugar levels below 131 mg/dL and peak post-meal levels below 180 mg/dL.
https://www.health.h...w-should-you-go
So the intended use was for people trying to get down to mid-hundreds mg/dL; there was no notion of being accurate below, say, 100 mg/dL.
Keto mojo's intended market is aggressive health-optimizers like us, (calorie restriction, keto and/or fasting) practitioners who are trying to get our glucose as low as possible. So my expectation (hope?) is they took more care to be accurate in the lower range. They claim measuring hematocrit helps make their glucose measurements more accurate:
We use the Hematocrit (HCT) number and run that through an algorithm with the Blood Glucose (BG) so we can get a tighter accuracy on the Blood Glucose. By using the additional calculation we can achieve an industry leading accuracy standard of deviation of only 5mg/dl under 100mg/dl or 5%. The FDA standard is that you can be out by 20% and still be approved, this is what you find with many other meterers
https://help.keto-mo...Txuy-hematocrit
So I'm allowing myself to put more confidence in the keto mojo more so than the others. It's possible my judgement is being coloured by what I want to be true, as it reports the lower number compared to the others.
This reference describes at least 4 different strip technologies that are used, and reports Mean Absolute Relative Difference (a measure of error) for a number of meters. Keto mojo is too new to be in the list.
http://sites.bu.edu/...echnol-2016.pdf