"Your body may have adapted to it"
Hi John,
Thanks for your response!
Yeah, I think so. No need to have blood work to conclude...DAT. haha
But I'm intrigued by your mentioning Igf-Lr3. I am reminded of what my thought process was way back in 1994, when I first started on HGH.
My main two notions were...
1) This stuff HAS to get cheaper! I was paying 15 bucks per IU back then, and I knew that Lilly was about to lose their exclusive on synthesizing HGH, so figured dramatic price drops were inevitable.
2) Since the big breakthrough was synthesizing HGH in the first place (prior to that it was extracted from human cadavers!) I figured more such breakthroughs were also inevitable - products that would work even better than HGH. I was mainly thinking along the lines of a longer half life, perhaps pre-mixed, and certainly more stable.
Fast-forward to 2018 and the future is here - but the results are mixed! Certainly HGH is cheaper. You can score 100IU's from China for about 200 or less! OTOH, the gold standard in my view (and remember I'm the longest continuous user of hgh in human history!) is Lilly and their prices are bizarrely about the same! My main Mexican hook-up, from which I've ordered countless times, will send you 4IU's of an off brand for like only 25. But, if you want Humatrope - it's 170 min buy for just 15 iu's.
Trump HAS to something about that....STAT. haha
And, man do I LOVE the smell of humatrope in the morning...
And, of course, I have been vaguely aware of the emergence of peptides (and, as mentioned, SARMS) throughout the ensuing years. As far as these advancements go, this is where I would defer to you. I think your suggestion that I take a hard look at Igf-Lr3 is spot on. From what I've been able to discover so far, it is precisely the kind of synthetic improvement I was looking forward to.
My only concern is that I'm after a swimmers body.
Not....THIS. https://www.youtube....NCK3UuIGU&t=36s
And, these hulk-looking dudes seem to be the ones singing the praises of taking Igf-Lr3 (in tandem, of course, with a cycle - which I also do NOT want) the most! https://www.youtube....query=IGF-1 LR3
If you go back to the more recent pic from my previous post, I'm really just looking at getting rid of that last 'circle' of abdominal body fat. It does appear to be shrinking away, albeit more slowly than I prefer, as a result of nothing more than the IFF/KETO (now largely carnivore) regimen that I have practiced, with increasing discipline, for the past several years. I engage in very...VERY little exercise. Light weights, rebounder, walking, dancing etc.
But I'm SIGNIFICANTLY happier with these results versus what I obtained during the 'just HGH and Workout' era as demonstrated in this pic taken around Y2K - about six years into it.
15726787_1466995506664075_7271413548199886467_n.jpg 33.99KB
0 downloads
My goal for #SUMMER18 was to be able spend most of my summer outside shirtless and it just didn't happen. Close, but not quite there. So, we have another fall/winter to prepare.
I have learned alot about body fat over the recent months. It can be very stubborn and, esp in older guys who've carried some over the years, very tough to eliminate. There's also no question that NUTRITION (not working out) has been the key to my most recent success. It also may surprise some that bodyfat is sometimes considered an 'organ' and responds to things totally unrelated to nutrition. For example, any intense changes in your routine can cause it to expand. It seems to work as a protector for you so there's this battle between what you want aesthetically and what your body is trying to do for you healthwise.
I visited tanning bed joints in the 80's, but like everything else, the technology today is radically improved. I have a friend that works at a tanning salon (after all the bad press and Obamacare assault, I was surprised they even existed!) She said - all we have is standups and you just go for like 8 minutes max. So, I tried it and it totally kicked my body's butt. Not only did it make me intensely red, then tan, but the abdominal body fat area reacted by INCREASING (for at least the next 30 hours!)
There are many other stress-related or adverse-weather affected examples of this phenomena, as well!
That is also (at least part of) the thinking behind the carnivore diet which, to simplify, is eating steak and butter ONLY. Nothing else - not even all the other low carb products out there. The idea is that the more VARIATION you introduce into your diet (esp in today's processed food climate - low carb or not!) the greater the chance you will introduce toxins and therefore the greater the chance your body fat will respond to those toxins in, you guessed it, protection mode, which means increasing it's surface area...
Edited by Doctor_L, 21 September 2018 - 12:02 AM.