SO! : O
I was checking out the works and texts of Mary V. Solanto - a PhD and expert on cognitive behavioural treatments, as well as on ADHD and other attention-deficits.
She did a study on the cognition of people with SCT - to discern if we really have, or DON'T have, deficits in Executive Functioning - her findings appears to point in the direction that we do, but perhaps it's in different regions than people with ADHD...
BUT...! She also found something alarming - the adults with SCT whom were on STIMULANTS, were the ones whom showed the more conclusive deficits in EF! Now, you could say, "why, that must be because the SCT-ers on stimulants are of course the ones whom have co-morbid ADHD as well! Simple."
No.
THINK! Stimulants improve EF-deficits in ADHD DRAMATICALLY! In fact, they are still the SUPREME kings of that, when it comes to the known ADHD-drugs.
As such, these deficits in stimulant-treated SCT-ers can't be from ADHD - it's more likely to be caused by something else, and since the NON-stimulant treated SCT-ers didn't show deficits in EF, then damn, it's probably the stimulants! : O
Apparently, they may not just be more or less useless (in fact... as far as we can tell, they actually appear to have more of a positive effect even on neurotypicals!) - they might also be harmful towards SCT-ers.
Not sure what to think about this... should I give up on Stimulants all-together, all things considered? Or should I simply use them more sparingly then I have previously?
Currently finishing a two-week trial of Focalin, and the results have been highly varying - multiple types of dosings, multiple dosing-schedules - combined with Guanfacine and without - under the influence of Tianeptine and without Tia.
Give me your thoughts gentlemen - how much should be read into this?
(ok, maybe not much, since it's just one study, and even the researchers aren't drawing too many conclusions either)
http://journals.sage...087054716682337