I just ordered 3 trillion probiotics so I cant really make a review but when I have the money to buy 60 trillion I will.
here's a answer to a question I had for the creator of this probiotic if anyone finds it helpful.
1) Yes, one course is 3 trillion CFU, split over 6 daily doses of 500 billion CFU.
You are correct that it seems like a small volume compared to the purported 100 trillion microbial cells in the gut. However, the reality is that 500 billion is
far more lactic acid bacteria than would be present throughout the ileum and in the colon (in normal circumstances), therefore, as far as their niche is concerned it is a large amount of lactic acid bacteria to be taking relative to what is naturally present in the gut. (Also remember the mechanism behind Elixa:
https://www.elixa-pr...ed-antibiotics/ )
Also, as eluded to above (re: ileum) a lot of the beneficial action takes place in the distal small intestine, where 500 billion CFU is a huge number of probiotic cells!
2) Re: number of cells in the gut:
The truth is that people have latched onto this number (100T) and just parroted it from article to article. Very little original research has been performed on getting this number and very few people have even read the original research.
In fact, it's all moot due to the following reason: A bowel movement can be 50% bacterial cells.
The lumenal mass (stool) in the colon, therefore contributes the largest portion of the total number of bacteria in the gut. This means that the number vary hugely depending on when you last had a bowel movement or the type of diet you are on.
If you eat 'The Carnivore Diet' you would have a vastly different number than if you were a fruitarian.
In other words, it's like trying to give an estimate of how much air volume is in a person's lungs - the variance is far larger than the difference of the averages.
Giving a CFU/ml (colony forming units per millilitre) would be a better way to characterise the variation in microbial density along the GIT. Those figures are available in the literature if you do a search on Google Scholar.
3)
I can't give a direct answer to this because the questions are based on a misunderstanding perpetuated by blogs online.
There is this idea of 'balance' and so on.
Well the very definition of bad and good would mean that you would always want 100% good and 0% bad.
If there were some advantage to having a certain portion of 'bad' bacteria, then, by definition, they would be good bacteria.
Here's the reality of it: forget about good and bad microbes and missing species from the gut. The aim is to remove inflammatory biofilm communities from the mucosal surface of the intestine. The fewer inflammatory microbes you have in your gut, the better. There is no element of 'balance'. You want to retain the harmless, planktonic, lumenal microbes. But there is no amount of inflammatory microbes that you want to retain except for zero.
Edited by kurdishfella, 24 February 2020 - 12:22 PM.