Sorry I could not be more polite,
Well if we are abandoning politeness, then let me say I think you do a poor job of following and understanding the news. Maybe that's down to watching dubious media channels like Fox News, or reading too many alt. news or conspiracy theory rags. I'd suggest tuning into TV channels that provide more in-depth analysis of the news. I find the BBC, France24 (English version), and occasionally CNN are reasonably good channels for in-depth news analysis.
CNN I used to watch a lot, but I find it has gone downhill a bit recently, because everything is just Trump-bashing on CNN. Sure, Trump needs to be criticized, but let's have some other news on CNN, not just always anti-Trump stuff.
It is NOT unreasonable to have a certain level of suspicion about the official communications of China, because it is definitely NOT a country known for transparency.
Repeating what I said earlier: we know that China is not known for transparency, and are constantly criticized by the West for this lack of openness. This is not in dispute.
But rather refreshingly in this instance, the order has come from the top, from President Xi Jinping, that everyone in China MUST be open about matter relating to the coronavirus. Seasoned journalists who work in China are amazed that on this particular matter, doctors, scientists as well as the general public are being given much more freedom of expression.
Anyone who is not aware of this order from President Xi Jinping that everyone in China can talk freely on COVID-19 coronavirus matters must be watching second-rate news channels.
Now, that being said, this does NOT mean that things iare binary : (China is 100% transparent VS China is 100% not transparent). I think they are being mostly transparent in this case, because the situation is very serious, and their future economical relationship with the western and asian countries that manufacture there depends on how reliable China is perceived as a partner in handling the situation and collaborating with the WHO.
Precisely. This is what I have been trying to say. I am glad someone shows some understanding.
As I said, the order came from President Xi Jinping that everyone should be transparent about coronavirus.
. That deep his need of security, that even with his otherwise sharp mind doesn't recognize, he just traded freedom of speech against his need of security.
That attempt of psychological analysis is off the mark.
If you want to know where I am coming from, well what actually concerns me is how lazy thinking and uniformed opinion group together to create a pool of misinformation and fake news online. Misinformation is an increasing problem in Western societies which offer freedom of speech to the populace. Western freedom of speech was not intended to provide the uniformed and the halfwits with a soap box.
In case you are not aware, the issues of misinformation and fake news online are being greatly discussed in recent years, because it is realized they cause major problems. We would not allow amateurs to perform brain surgery, nor allow people that cannot drive onto the roads; yet we let the uniformed in their millions free rein online. That's bound to cause calamity.
I certainly do not believe in a suppression of expression; but I don't think any society should be run as an "idiocracy" (if anyone saw that stupid movie), so we need to get the uniformed off the Internet.
The immense shutdown in China just doesn't make any sense to a rational being.
Really? Well the Italian government has just ordered a similar shutdown after nearly 400 coronavirus deaths in their country. The UK has also said it will do this if and when necessary. So either all these national leaders and their experts scientific and medical advisers are thinking irrationally. Or those on this thread are.
Edited by Hip, 10 March 2020 - 02:34 PM.