2092 replies to this topic

[Mind]

Since when is posting peer-reviewed research anti-vax propaganda?

 

Someone has to keep a discriminating eye on the medical establishment and big pharma, otherwise we end up with "smoking is harmless", "sugar/carbs are great", opioids are the only pain management modality, vioxx is perfectly safe for your heart....etc. All of these were pushed with "the science". The result was a lot of unnecessary death and disability.

 

When our health leaders go on TV a blatantly lie, people should ask questions. The CDC has admitted to lying several times when asked about monitoring the safety of the injections. Usually when people lie, you don't trust them as much the next time.

[Gal220]

Recent autopsies confirms death from myocarditis via the mRNA vaccine

 

https://twitter.com/...157979529371648

https://twitter.com/...545066196598784

 

 

Two troubling points

-"This is a German study from a reputable group. It's very hard to conduct this research in the U.S."

 

-"I highlighted the fact they died at home b/c cases like this would have been missed in the existing myocarditis studies that have been looking at cases symptomatic enough to bring people to the doctor.

This study suggests we have been missing some severe myocarditis"

 

 

Why is it hard to do these studies in the U.S.?  Why did Fauci discourage autopies?

How bad is it?  The insurance data tells the truth 

 

 

 

[Mind]

Recent autopsies confirms death from myocarditis via the mRNA vaccine

 

https://twitter.com/...157979529371648

https://twitter.com/...545066196598784

 

 

Two troubling points

-"This is a German study from a reputable group. It's very hard to conduct this research in the U.S."

 

-"I highlighted the fact they died at home b/c cases like this would have been missed in the existing myocarditis studies that have been looking at cases symptomatic enough to bring people to the doctor.

This study suggests we have been missing some severe myocarditis"

 

 

Why is it hard to do these studies in the U.S.?  Why did Fauci discourage autopies?

How bad is it?  The insurance data tells the truth 

 

As we have found out through time, not only is the CDC and other US public "health" agencies NOT conducting any autopsies to investigate side effects or deaths from the COVID injections, they ARE willfully ignoring any requests to engage in any investigation and (self-admittedly) LYING about monitoring the safety. This is all on public record.

[Mind]

Remember when some posters in this forum, heads of public "health" agencies, and some researchers became apoplectic and filled with rage at the discussion of natural immunity to SARS-CoV2?

 

Study after study, after study, after study, and now another study, show that the immune system is capable of successfully fighting the virus and produces long lasting durable immunity.

 

Remember when scientists were struggling to explain why Africa was not devastated by COVID. Africa is still not being devastated by COVID - even though barely anyone on the continent has taken the COVID injections.

 

In addition, this is something that was obvious from the beginning of the media-created COVID panic - that the mortality rate in young people was extremely low, so much so that it would be nearly impossible to run a statistically relevant vaccine trial (because you would have to inject millions of test subjects to find out if a small handful of lives could be saved). Even though this was common knowledge, if you discussed the risk-benefit of injecting young people, you were labelled a anti-vax conspiracy nut, a killer, and idiot, and a lot worse things by the raging COVID mob. Many countries around the world stopped injecting young people a long time ago because the risk-benefit was not favorable. A publication in BMJ has also analyzed at the risk-benefit and found that the COVID injections produce vastly more harm than good in younger people.

[Gal220]

Recent hearing hosted by Senator Ron Johnson on vaccine safety

 

https://rumble.com/v...d-vaccines.html

[Mind]

Recent hearing hosted by Senator Ron Johnson on vaccine safety

 

https://rumble.com/v...d-vaccines.html

 

It is amazing to me that Senator Johnson is about the only federal government official who is concerned about the COVID injections and their side effects. EVEN if the side effects and deaths are a lot smaller than thousands of doctors, epidemiologists, virologists, insurance companies, embalmers, etc... claim, the public health agencies should be concerned. They should be looking into it. They should be transparent about the process.

 

I don't usually swear, but it is scary that the CDC doesn't seem to give a crap if anyone dies from the injections. Prior to the media-created COVID panic, just a handful of deaths or side effects in a drug or vaccine trial would shut the whole thing down. Now the CDC and FDA are approving multiple "vaccines" without RCT data. The latest booster was approved based upon results in 8 mice. Combinations of injections are given approval with NO studies what-so-ever.

[Mind]

The CDC, WHO, NIH, and public "health" agencies continue to ignore any side effects or deaths from the COVID injections. Thankfully there are some groups pushing for an investigation. An actuarial society in Australia is sounding the alarm about the massive increase in excess deaths this year. If it was only one or two countries with large percentages of excess deaths this year, it wouldn't be as concerning, but when it is happening in most of the world where the COVID injections were forced upon the population, then it becomes alarming.

 

The number of side effects and deaths have risen to such a level, that clinics are starting to open with the hopes of healing people who suffered side effects from the COVID injections.

 

Meanwhile, the same people who funded the gain-of-function research, lied about many aspects of COVID, irresponsibly sowed irrational fear across the world, effectively banned any treatments except for the big-pharma products, are now blaming YOU for pandemics - because you interact with nature. This is happening at a meeting of the GLOBAL DEATH HEALTH COUNCIL.

 

Thankfully more responsible doctors are gaining enough courage to speak up about potential side effects of the injections - this time about cancer. (and another report about the rise in early onset cancer - curiously timed with the roll-out of the COVID injections). Even if it turns out that there is no provable link between the COVID injections and cancer, the recent rise in cancer rates should be investigated. It should be investigated even if to only RULE OUT the injections. Why are public "health" agencies around the world so adamant about NOT monitoring any safety aspects of the injections?

 

Other researchers have looked into the trial data and found what other groups have found - a long list of serious side effects that were reported during the trials.

 

Some people speculate that the public "health" agencies are corrupt and that is why they don't want to look into anything regarding the COVID injections. Judging by Dr. Fauci's court transcript, suspicion is warranted. Remember that Dr. Fauci coordinated with Francis Collins in an effort to destroy the Great Barrington Declaration - GBD (found out through publicly released emails). Now in the court deposition Dr. Fauci says he barely knew anything about the GBD. He is a liar.

[Mind]

One of the reasons that nearly everyone is rejecting the latest booster push is because so many people know someone who has suffered serious side effects or death from the injections. People know who Eric Clapton is. He suffered severe paralysis after the COVID injection. Now Celine DIon has SPS, which is listed as a side effect of the injections - BY PFIZER. People saw the CDC director get the bivalent booster and then get COVID...TWICE! There are many other problems with the latest booster.

 

More published research about heart problems due to the injections in Thailand.

 

Published and peer-reviewed research out of Germany - deaths of 25 people within days after getting injected - heart conditions confirmed by autopsy. No other known health problems (except that they got the COVID injection)

 

No abstract yet available here but link found between the COVID injections and large cell arteritis.

 

Published research: Increase in POTS found after COVID injections.

 

Are all of these researchers and the editorial staffs at these publications anti-vax conspiracy nuts? Do they need to be arrested? Are they just plain idiots and don't understand science? Are they publishing fake research because they hate humanity? I don't think so. I think they are doing the job that the FDA, WHO, and CDC should be doing. Public "health" agencies continue to ignore any and all side effects from the injections.

 

Here is a deep dive into the people (n=170) who were part of the initial COVID injection trial and were the "proof" of effectiveness. Many more questions than answers.

 

Studies promoting the effectiveness of the injections, or the mortality rate between injected versus non-injected, based primarily upon RT-PCR testing are likely misleading or not robust because of the high false positive rate of the RT-PCR tests. Published Research.

 

Latest junk study that claims the COVID injections saved millions of lives in the US alone, is based upon the premise that the IFR during the Omicron wave was 2%. In reality, the IFR during the Omicron wave was a tiny fraction of one percent. Some other people noticed this as well.

 

Edited by Mind, 16 December 2022 - 07:54 PM.

[Mind]

More and more doctors and scientists are beginning to ask questions about the COVID injections. Do they work as good as promised? What are the side effects? What is it doing when it travels to all organs of the body? This should have been happening a long while ago but the COVID rage mob threatened anyone who asked any questions.

[Dorian Grey]

Hokey Smokes Bullwinkle!  Did the FDA just say CLOT SHOT? 

 

https://www.scienced...264410X22014931

 

Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older

 

Its FDA authors state: "Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44)"

 

"After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did. No statistical signals were identified following vaccination with either the mRNA-1273 or Ad26 COV2.S vaccines."

 

"This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly"

Edited by Dorian Grey, 19 December 2022 - 05:10 PM.

[joesixpack]

Hokey Smokes Bullwinkle!  Did the FDA just say CLOT SHOT? 

 

https://www.scienced...264410X22014931

 

Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older

 

Its FDA authors state: "Four outcomes met the threshold for a statistical signal following BNT162b2 vaccination including pulmonary embolism (PE; RR = 1.54), acute myocardial infarction (AMI; RR = 1.42), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC; RR = 1.91), and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP; RR = 1.44)"

 

"After further evaluation, only the RR for PE still met the statistical threshold for a signal; however, the RRs for AMI, DIC, and ITP no longer did. No statistical signals were identified following vaccination with either the mRNA-1273 or Ad26 COV2.S vaccines."

 

"This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly"

 

I think they are saying "maybe", but it's a step in the right direction.

[Dorian Grey]

"After further evaluation"...  Sounds like some bending the data, "first you see it, now you don't" plausible deniability editing was done to "fix" the problem.  

 

Now let's look into the VAERS data, shall we?  https://openvaers.com/

 

DOH!  

Edited by Dorian Grey, 19 December 2022 - 06:51 PM.

[Empiricus]

Hokey Smokes Bullwinkle!  Did the FDA just say CLOT SHOT? 

 

https://www.scienced...264410X22014931

 

Surveillance of COVID-19 vaccine safety among elderly persons aged 65 years and older

 

 

"This early warning system is the first to identify temporal associations for PE, AMI, DIC, and ITP following BNT162b2 vaccination in the elderly"

 

Early warning system? Early?     

Edited by Empiricus, 20 December 2022 - 07:32 AM.

[Gal220]

This article from a German study is causing a stir

 

 

"The Most Important Dataset of the Pandemic…"  - Check out the comments at the bottom

https://amidwesternd...-dataset-of-the

 

https://twitter.com/...145716522995713

https://twitter.com/...854746750066688

https://twitter.com/...src=typed_query

[Gal220]

How does someone turn anti-vax?

https://www.smh.com....220-p5c7ry.html

https://dailysceptic...being-censored/

https://twitter.com/...467339822141440

 

 

"Professor Phelps is a raging leftist, and was extremely pro-lockdown, pro-mandate during Covid."

 

But then

 

"Former Australian federal MP Dr. Kerryn Phelps has revealed she and her wife both suffered serious and ongoing injures from Covid vaccines, while suggesting the true rate of adverse events is far higher than acknowledged due to under-reporting and “threats” from medical regulators"

Edited by Gal220, 21 December 2022 - 08:07 AM.

[calimero]

People Died from mRNA-Vaccine-Damaged Hearts, New Peer-Reviewed German Study Provides Direct Evidence

 

Edited by calimero, 21 December 2022 - 11:32 PM.

[joesixpack]

 

People Died from mRNA-Vaccine-Damaged Hearts, New Peer-Reviewed German Study Provides Direct Evidence

 

 

This links to an article about the study, which explains the study. In an effort to avoid the usual time wasting diversions (attacking the source) that typically occur when such stories are published, here is a direct link to the study. https://link.springe...392-022-02129-5

 

The researchers studied complete autopsy findings and data, including microscopic pictures of heart tissue, to determine cause of death in 25 people that experienced sudden unexplained death within 20 days of receiving the Covid 19 vaccination.

 

They concluded that 4 of the people died as the result of taking 1 vaccine. A fifth person died after taken the second vaccine. The study involved people with ages up to 75, the average age was 58.

 

20% is a rather high death rate, not "rare and unusual" as we are being told.

[healthmysteries31]

during the last 20 years of autopsy service at Heidelberg University Hospital we did not observe comparable myocardial inflammatory infiltration. This was validated by histological re-evaluation of age- and sex-matched cohorts from three independent periods, which did not reveal a single case showing a comparable cardiac pathology.

 

 

I would say that this is pretty strong evidence that sudden cardiac deaths following vaccines are  new unique pathology, not rare and not a coincidental event.

I wonder if it is possible to estimate the death rate from vaccination relying on these numbers?

 

example: 5% of adverse events are reported and 20% are causally related. That would mean death numbers are 4x of what is reported.

[Daniel Cooper]

I'll throw in two anecdotes for what it's worth (maybe not much).

 

I'm familiar with two cases from friends/coworkers that had myocarditis after getting the covid vaccine.

 

First case was a 72 year old female. The day after the 2nd shot she called emergency services suffering from what she thought was a heart attack. Was taken into the ER, they ran blood labs and saw no evidence of cardiac infarction, Was admitted into the hospital for a day with myocarditis.

 

Second case was a 63 year old male. Also the 2nd of the original covid vaccines. On the day after the vaccine he started noticing chest tightness/pain that increased into day 2 at which point he went to the hospital. Labs said it was not a heart attack, was admitted to the hospital for observation, diagnosed as myocarditis.

 

I don't know that this proves anything beyond the fact that myocarditis after a covid vaccine isn't unheard of given that I know two cases of it in my sphere of acquaintances.

 

 

[Mind]

I'll throw in two anecdotes for what it's worth (maybe not much).

 

I'm familiar with two cases from friends/coworkers that had myocarditis after getting the covid vaccine.

 

First case was a 72 year old female. The day after the 2nd shot she called emergency services suffering from what she thought was a heart attack. Was taken into the ER, they ran blood labs and saw no evidence of cardiac infarction, Was admitted into the hospital for a day with myocarditis.

 

Second case was a 63 year old male. Also the 2nd of the original covid vaccines. On the day after the vaccine he started noticing chest tightness/pain that increased into day 2 at which point he went to the hospital. Labs said it was not a heart attack, was admitted to the hospital for observation, diagnosed as myocarditis.

 

I don't know that this proves anything beyond the fact that myocarditis after a covid vaccine isn't unheard of given that I know two cases of it in my sphere of acquaintances.

 

I am interested to hear your anecdotes. Obviously, not what is considered statistically relevant data, but in today's media environment, it is good practice to look around and see what is going on in your sphere of acquaintances.

 

When everyone said masks would end the media-created COVID panic in a couple of weeks, I looked around to see if that was happening. When I saw that everyone wearing masks still got COVID that confirmed pre-pandemic research that plainly showed masks would be a poor pandemic response.

 

When we were told that the COVID injections were 100% safe and effective, I looked around to see if injected people around me were doing okay. Thankfully, most of them are doing okay, but there is a disturbing percentage of them that suddenly developed heart problems. One ended up having a stroke and spent 5 weeks in the hospital. One of my relatives had aggressive cancer return after being injected.

[Hip]

I'll throw in two anecdotes for what it's worth (maybe not much).

 

I'm familiar with two cases from friends/coworkers that had myocarditis after getting the covid vaccine.

 

First case was a 72 year old female. The day after the 2nd shot she called emergency services suffering from what she thought was a heart attack. Was taken into the ER, they ran blood labs and saw no evidence of cardiac infarction, Was admitted into the hospital for a day with myocarditis.

 

Second case was a 63 year old male. Also the 2nd of the original covid vaccines. On the day after the vaccine he started noticing chest tightness/pain that increased into day 2 at which point he went to the hospital. Labs said it was not a heart attack, was admitted to the hospital for observation, diagnosed as myocarditis.

 

I don't know that this proves anything beyond the fact that myocarditis after a covid vaccine isn't unheard of given that I know two cases of it in my sphere of acquaintances.

 

Interesting that you observed two people in your social network who developed myocarditis after the COVID vaccines. Anecdotally, that's a high prevalence, given that the social circle that one hears about (acquaintances, friends, and friends of friends) probably consists of around a 100 to 200 people. Two cases of myocarditis in 200 people is high. 

 

In my social circle, I have not heard of any vaccine side effects, other than the usual feeling tired or having a fever for a day or two after the vaccination. One family member did report a long lasting mild pain at the injection site that lasted some weeks, but that's all I heard about. 

 

 

 

Maybe these side effects are batch related. So when a bad batch is distributed in a particular city or region, people in that region will hear of lots side effects from their social network. Whereas when a region gets a good batch, people may hear very little in terms of side effect stories.

 

So this might explain why people have different views of the COVID vaccines. If your region got a bad batch, and you know several people who experienced side effects, then it may change your views on the safety of the vaccines. 

 

 

 

If you run a query on the VAERS database, asking for the COVID vaccine batch numbers for people who suffered myocarditis after COVID vaccination, you get these results. These results only show the vaccine batch numbers where myocarditis was reported. 

 

But looking down that table of batch numbers, you can see that for most batch numbers, there was only around 1 or 2 reported cases of myocarditis. But some batch numbers have 20, 30 or more cases. In one case, the Pfizer/Biontech batch number FE6975, there were 56 reported case of myocarditis.

 

So that suggests some batches may be worse than others. (Of course, this assumes each batch production run is of equal size, in terms of the number of vaccine doses distributed under that batch number).

 

 

 

 

If anyone wants to interrogate the VAERS database, you can run a query here. 

Edited by Hip, 22 December 2022 - 11:23 PM.

[Mind]

Here is another case study out of South Korea. In this case, the COVID injection is the most likely cause of myocarditis and sudden death. There are several of these from several different countries - just not in the US because the CDC and FDA refuse to take a good look at side effects and deaths).

 

Whistleblowers that were involved in the COVID injection trials told everyone that these were very sloppily done. Protocols were not followed. Steve Kirsch has noticed that anaphylaxis reports were lost in the mix giving the impression that there were no bad reactions from these injections. Recently, a person died from a COVID injection reaction and Canada compensated the family their loss.

 

Is the large rise in hypertension in the US due to the COVID injections?

[Hip]

 

Is the large rise in hypertension in the US due to the COVID injections?

 

Dr Naomi Wolf, a certified conspiracy theorist.

[healthmysteries31]

I doubt that governments will ever admit the true extent of vaccine related  cardiac deaths. Perhaps the strategy will be to deny/downplay and then accept a tiny percentage and shut-down any further investigation.

 

It's not practical for them to do so and they don't have any other choice.

 

If they admit problems exist they would have problems continuing their vaccine programs which is not an option from their point of view.

 

Lawsuits would be extreme, after all governments relied on coercion and propaganda to increase vaccine uptake.

 

Big Pharma would also be in trouble.

 

Any future pandemic vaccination development would be threatened, not in the interest of them either.

 

So the only option is to deny. 100% denial isn't practical, there is too much evidence. The only thing left is to be prepared to accept a minuscule number as causally related, compensate those few and move on.

Edited by healthmysteries31, 23 December 2022 - 09:40 PM.

[Empiricus]

I doubt that governments will ever admit the true extent of vaccine related  cardiac deaths. Perhaps the strategy will be to deny/downplay and then accept a tiny percentage and shut-down any further investigation.

 

It's not practical for them to do so and they don't have any other choice.

 

If they admit problems exist they would have problems continuing their vaccine programs which is not an option from their point of view.

 

Lawsuits would be extreme, after all governments relied on coercion and propaganda to increase vaccine uptake. Too late

 

Big Pharma would also be in trouble.Too late

 

Any future pandemic vaccination development would be threatened, not in the interest of them either. Too late

 

So the only option is to deny. 100% denial isn't practical, there is too much evidence. The only thing left is to be prepared to accept a minuscule number as causally related, compensate those few and move on.

 

None of these things can be averted now, it's too late.

 

I don't see how they get out of this now by way of more denials and attempts to minimize.

[Gal220]

I doubt that governments will ever admit the true extent of vaccine related  cardiac deaths. Perhaps the strategy will be to deny/downplay and then accept a tiny percentage and shut-down any further investigation.

 

It might get to the point where it can't be denied

 

"Covid cases now falling in both classic Covid-19 and SARS-CoVax-22. About 10 days remain before deaths begin to fall as well. Then there will be no place to hide the 7,400 Excess NCNCM deaths each week. Dilemma forthcoming for the Narrative."

https://twitter.com/...494123333844993

 

 

 

But either way, this is why the government shouldn't approve AND monitor safety data, obvious conflict of interest. 

 

Multiple 3rd parties should be tracking safety signals and making recommendations on predefined criteria(pull after 100 deaths)

[joesixpack]

Interesting that you observed two people in your social network who developed myocarditis after the COVID vaccines. Anecdotally, that's a high prevalence, given that the social circle that one hears about (acquaintances, friends, and friends of friends) probably consists of around a 100 to 200 people. Two cases of myocarditis in 200 people is high. 

 

In my social circle, I have not heard of any vaccine side effects, other than the usual feeling tired or having a fever for a day or two after the vaccination. One family member did report a long lasting mild pain at the injection site that lasted some weeks, but that's all I heard about. 

 

 

 

Maybe these side effects are batch related. So when a bad batch is distributed in a particular city or region, people in that region will hear of lots side effects from their social network. Whereas when a region gets a good batch, people may hear very little in terms of side effect stories.

 

So this might explain why people have different views of the COVID vaccines. If your region got a bad batch, and you know several people who experienced side effects, then it may change your views on the safety of the vaccines. 

 

 

 

If you run a query on the VAERS database, asking for the COVID vaccine batch numbers for people who suffered myocarditis after COVID vaccination, you get these results. These results only show the vaccine batch numbers where myocarditis was reported. 

 

But looking down that table of batch numbers, you can see that for most batch numbers, there was only around 1 or 2 reported cases of myocarditis. But some batch numbers have 20, 30 or more cases. In one case, the Pfizer/Biontech batch number FE6975, there were 56 reported case of myocarditis.

 

So that suggests some batches may be worse than others. (Of course, this assumes each batch production run is of equal size, in terms of the number of vaccine doses distributed under that batch number).

 

 

 

 

If anyone wants to interrogate the VAERS database, you can run a query here. 

What you are reporting here, has been noted by other's over the last couple of years. Injuries may be batch related. Yet, manufacturers are not reporting, or recalling bad batches.

 

This has prompted some people to refuse further vaccines, as they have no way of knowing which batches may be bad, or even to know what batch they are getting.

 

Good catch.

[Gal220]

Jessica Rose summarizing new data on the mRNA shot

https://jessicar.sub...anism-of-action  (also check out the comments at the bottom)

https://www.science....immunol.ade2798

 

 

A shift to tolerance and autoimmunity from the shots

 

"Instead of the intended pool of spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies being dominant in multiply-injected people, a pool of antibodies associated with spike-specific tolerance are dominant in multiply-injected people."

 

"To be clear, this wasn’t a ‘maybe the antibody profile was a little different’ type situation. This was a ‘whoa there’s a 48,075% increase in spike-specific antibodies between the 2nd and 3rd injections’ situation"

 

 

 

I dont recommend the covid vaccine, but it looks like Novavax might be the safest.  Or maybe just 1 shot of Pfizer(if no cancer issues), the shots make spike for 2 months+, there was never a reason for the 2nd shot other than $$(IMO the only reason to take either is work/travel restrictions, so 1 shot probably not viable)

 

Chart of Vaccine associated deaths(b/c health agencies are too ashamed to do the autopsies)

https://twitter.com/...375528788738048

 

 

 

Edited by Gal220, 27 December 2022 - 10:54 PM.

[Mind]

Dr Naomi Wolf, a certified conspiracy theorist.

 

Typical...a logical non-sequitur and attacking the messenger. I was wondering if anyone could confirm this or if the data is reliable. 

[Mind]

Wondering how governments might slowly try to weasel out of promoting a dangerous therapeutic, note how Australia now says the Moderna "vaccine" is "no longer available" for kids. Doubtful they are unable to get more of the vaccine. I suspect they just don't want to come out and say that the risk/reward is terrible for kids (after they tried to force everyone to get an injection).

 

This recent peer-reviewed research suggests (also noted by Gal220 above) a reason why more injected people are now dying than un-injected (which has been the case for many months now in the countries with the highest mRNA injection rates) and why injected people are catching COVID more frequently, and transmitting it more, their immune system's capability of mediating anti-body dependent cellular phagocytosis is being destroyed by repeated boosters.

 

Remember when government "health" agencies said don't worry - the COVID injection just stays in your arm. That was completely false as proven by multiple studies and autopsy case studies (all linked in this thread). Add this peer-reviewed case study - encoded mRNA from the injection found in persistent herpes infections.

 

Add this to the perplexing data. Haiti has a very low vaccination rate, yet also has one of the lowest case rates and mortality rates out of any country in the world. It seems the current waves of COVID are a "pandemic of the VACCINATED."

 

It has been suggested that the massive new wave of myocarditis and pericarditis in the last 3 years were due to people getting COVID and it is a consequence of the disease. This has been disproven by a large population-based study.

 

Just a preprint here. Myocarditis MORTALITY risk is significant for younger adults who have gotten the mRNA injections.