The present cover-up is what I find most troubling. I think too much information is now available about the risks of the vaccines for it not to be shared and acted upon. To continue ignoring it would seem to require an utter disregard for the public welfare.
But I wonder, could this cover-up not alternatively be explained by the perpetrators' own fears of facing the wrath of the people they injured through their recklessness?
Except that the cover-up appears to be just as coordinated as the original vaccine push. I would think if the perpetrators had good intentions, at least some of them would decide it's better to come clean about their mistakes knowing this would help prevent causing further injury to people. Instead, the world's public officials march in lockstep. The media won't look at the issue. Tech companies continue to censor information. And the pharmaceutical companies deny the mRNA are unsafe.
What we have is a pointless new booster recommended even for infants. How to make sense of cover-up related decisions made at high levels and the ongoing complicity of so many institutions?
Yes, the more I look at it the more it looks deliberate, at least by some of the participants. I think most of us went through a similar process of evaluating the shot. At first it sounded good because we heard all that fear porn about how terrible covid is. It turned out that covid was just a bad flu, but we didn't know.
Then we heard that it wasn't tested, was rushed through. That didn't sound good. And then we started hearing about the side effects and deaths. Long about then they started mandating it, illegally, and people were fired from their jobs for not taking it. Some were later rehired and given back pay but many were forced into the shot.
I agree that its even more suspicious that they are still covering it all up years after the truth leaked out. Anyone can make a mistake but this was no mistake and continuing the coverup years after doctors and scientists started blowing the whistle is the exact opposite of what we would expect and what has always been done in the past when a drug turned out to be dangerous
Thalidomide was a drug introduced in the 50s to treat various conditions including leprosy. It turned out to cause severe birth defects and was taken off the market a few years later when cases began to turn up. It was blocked in the usa by the fda which at that time at least, seemed to be doing its job. There was never any cover up and the facts were published.
According to the FDA, a “drug is removed from the market when its risks outweigh its benefits. A drug is usually taken off the market because of safety issues with the drug that cannot be corrected, such as when it is discovered that the drug can cause serious side effects that were not known at the time of approval.”
The monitoring and controls were supposed to be more robust after thalidomide and a number of drugs were pulled from the market after serious side effects became known. However in this case, the doctors and scientists who came forward with the information were attacked and silenced. The media called them vaccine deniers and science deniers despite the fact it was not a vaccine and science was disregarded in its production and approval
This has never happened before to my recollection. Since when did government, the top medical establishment and the media work together hand in glove to force something untested on the public? The flu shot is optional, the polio vaccine, rabies etc are all voluntary and they, unlike the covid shot, had been thoroughly tested before being given. The goal seems to be to reduce the population