Given that mRNA vaccines were new technology, don't you think that an extra level of scrutiny is warranted?
Yes, it is normal for something new to receive extra scrutiny. Just look at all the scrutiny that mobile phone cellular networks and WiFi received when they were introduced. There was a degree of alarm and panic about everyone being bathed in microwaves, and countries like Sweden even created WiFi free zones in their schools and hospitals, due to the concern.
These days, we have got used to the presence of WiFi and mobile phones, and don't worry about them much now.
So it would be normal to scrutinise a new technology like mRNA vaccines.
However, my point is that the same amount of minor issues that have been posted on Longevity about the mRNA vaccines would probably been found in any older traditional vaccine, had that vaccine received the same amount of scrutiny. Any time you closely scrutinise anything, you are going to find minor issues.
Anyone casually reading these COVID threads might think the mRNA vaccines are laden with problems. But this is not the case.
The main problem with any vaccine, including the COVD vaccines, is that they sometimes trigger ME/CFS, which is a horrible lifetime affliction. I consider this the most serious issue with vaccination, and one that must be investigated thoroughly. Getting ME/CFS is tantamount to a death sentence.