Thanks for the informative responses. I hope responders will bear with me as I comment chronologically.
John Hemmings 12:47 07Feb22: Thanks for that. I’m going to assume that with my low inflammation and exercise my NAD levels are probably good.
I’m more unsure about the model that tinkering with the cellular level, as plausible as the theory is, necessarily translates to an optimised body system. I already have, for me, evidence that what correlates well for by CV doesn’t for my CKD.
Sensei 15:58 07Feb22: How does one measure Autophagy? From what I can glean, it is either a very specialised lab-derived metric, or an assumed effect of fasting (that is, not directly measured). Without an easy way to detect it, maybe my mainly vegetarian diet, exercise, sleep, etc are doing the job.
Whilst CRP may not be the best metric for inflammation, I don’t know of any other easily available metric. Would there not be a correlation between CRP and those you think are better anyway? Perhaps CRP is a good enough indicator? In my case it is only one of many biometrics I use to assess my health/illness of the three degenerative illness I’m prey to (CV, CKD, and cancer).
Both: Whilst I will continue to try anything that promises to reduce or reverse ageing, those I have tried to date (fisetin, melatonin, MitoQ, Niacel, etc) haven’t correlated too well with the more attested metrics I use. For me, the macro trumps the micro – am I frail, can I walk well, am I mentally OK (I had the fortunate experience the other day in being the subject of a memory assessment research project – taking two hours – and luckily, I’m OK), do my bones break when I fall (not), are my longs OK, my hand-grip, etc. That said, I’m trying hard to lie long enough to benefit from any proven anti-ageing programmes that come along.