1 reply to this topic

[ironfistx]

I'm 41.

longevityadvantage.com says I'm 34.

aging.ai 2.0 says I'm 44.

aging.ai 3.0 says I'm 42.

I wanted to do young.ai but it seems like the wanted a bunch of personal information and I didn't want to upload my blood test results (seemed personal?) and I wasn't wanting to type them by hand. And they want a picture.

Do these provide any benefit?

Edited by ironfistx, 25 December 2022 - 07:01 AM.

[Mind]

The aging biomarker tests obviously need some improvement. They are a bit noisy and some of them might not be all that well correlated to biological age. I am sure they will get better.

 

However, I think the AgeMeter (and other functional aging tests) are the gold standard, and will be for a few more years.