• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo

RDW Is A Significant Predictor Of Biological Age: Which Factors May Optimize It?

blood testing

  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 Michael Lustgarten

  • Guest
  • 418 posts
  • 514
  • Location:Boston
  • NO

Posted 14 February 2024 - 07:58 PM


https://www.youtube....h?v=cOg91UU6NNY

Attached Files

  • Attached File  rdw.png   480.9KB   0 downloads

  • WellResearched x 1

#2 albedo

  • Guest
  • 2,119 posts
  • 756
  • Location:Europe
  • NO

Posted 17 February 2024 - 12:57 PM

Great Michael. Maybe I overlooked, but shouldn't it be 11.4 - 11.9 (vs your 12.6) in your reproduced chart for the 1-5 and 5-25 percentiles in Tonelli 2019?

 

Attached File  Screenshot 2024-02-17 135322.png   674.55KB   0 downloads


  • Good Point x 1

Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 albedo

  • Guest
  • 2,119 posts
  • 756
  • Location:Europe
  • NO

Posted 17 February 2024 - 12:59 PM

Great Michael. Maybe I overlooked, but shouldn't it be 11.4 - 11.9 (vs your 12.6) in your reproduced chart for the 1-5 and 5-25 percentiles in Tonelli 2019?

 

Attached File  Screenshot 2024-02-17 135322.png   674.55KB   0 downloads


  • Good Point x 1

#4 Michael Lustgarten

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 418 posts
  • 514
  • Location:Boston
  • NO

Posted 17 February 2024 - 01:41 PM

Thanks Albedo for your critical eye!

In Table 1 from that paper, they listed the minimum values for each percentile, and 12.6 is the beginning of the 25-50% percentile. That means that the optimal range is from the minimum value in percentile 1 (11.4) to just before the 25th percentile (12.59)...


Edited by Michael Lustgarten, 17 February 2024 - 01:58 PM.

  • Good Point x 1

#5 albedo

  • Guest
  • 2,119 posts
  • 756
  • Location:Europe
  • NO

Posted 17 February 2024 - 09:57 PM

Of course .. bad me! Got it :)


  • Good Point x 1

#6 Michael Lustgarten

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 418 posts
  • 514
  • Location:Boston
  • NO

Posted 17 February 2024 - 10:25 PM

No worries, albedo, you almost got me! Initially, I thought I made a mistake, but when I took another look at the paper, not this time :) 

Ha, eventually someone will get me, which is ok, everyone misspeaks/makes mistakes eventually...


  • like x 1

#7 albedo

  • Guest
  • 2,119 posts
  • 756
  • Location:Europe
  • NO

Posted Today, 12:41 PM

Hello Michael, I am pretty sure you know already but in case it looks like this paper might be a great addition for your understanding of results and interpretation:

 

Foy, B.H., Petherbridge, R., Roth, M.T. et al. Haematological setpoints are a stable and patient-specific deep phenotype. Nature (2024). https://doi.org/10.1...586-024-08264-5

 

See also Eric Topol's:

 

https://erictopol.su.../your-lab-tests

 

Attached File  Screenshot 2024-12-16 134143.png   467.98KB   0 downloads


Edited by albedo, Today, 12:42 PM.

  • Good Point x 1

Click HERE to rent this GENETICS advertising spot to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#8 Michael Lustgarten

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 418 posts
  • 514
  • Location:Boston
  • NO

Posted Today, 01:18 PM

Hello Michael, I am pretty sure you know already but in case it looks like this paper might be a great addition for your understanding of results and interpretation:

 

Foy, B.H., Petherbridge, R., Roth, M.T. et al. Haematological setpoints are a stable and patient-specific deep phenotype. Nature (2024). https://doi.org/10.1...586-024-08264-5

 

See also Eric Topol's:

 

https://erictopol.su.../your-lab-tests

 

attachicon.gif Screenshot 2024-12-16 134143.png

 

Hi albedo, yes, I saw that via Eric's X, too!

Ha, I've been saying this since 2015-the field is finally catching up...


  • Cheerful x 1





Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: blood testing

2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users