ChatGPT is about equal to, or more creative than 149 measured humans at generative creative thinking, and divergent thinking. Strongly supporting the use of nonsentient AI at Longevity drug and treatment development.
The paper at The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks | Scientific Reports (nature.com) describes this, and at the paper there is a link to download all of the creative responses of the humans and chatGPT4.
The chatgpt4 responses were to the prompt, "For this task, you'll be asked to come up with as original and creative uses for [item] as you can. The goal is to come up with creative ideas, which are ideas that strike people as clever, unusual, interesting, uncommon, humorous, innovative, or different.
Your ideas don't have to be practical or realistic; they can be silly or strange, even, so long as they are CREATIVE uses rather than ordinary uses. List [insert fluency number] ORIGINAL and CREATIVE uses for a [item].
When I tried this prompt, Edge Broswer beta test edition had much more creative output than the chatgpt4 creative output at the published paper. Give Edge Browser Copilot a try and generate creative things and content.
