• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Longevity Diary comprehensive solution achieved an 80% life extension effect,

longevity

  • Please log in to reply
41 replies to this topic

#31 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Yesterday, 12:41 PM

We don't know your detailed situation, but how about your BMI? And your waist circumference? Perhaps you could start with reducing abdominal fat.

 

It is obvious that most lab-tests improved (last time counted about 2500 data points) and that I experienced a number of remission with otherwise considered incurable disease. Mission impossible accomplished, but remaining proactive and attentive that it stays that way.

 

Therefore, no reason to speculate on causes, despite having reached the seemingly impossible very few would be able too

 

BMI or abdominal fat is ideal, and wasn't the cause of my chronic diseases to begin with. Lack of endogenous hormone productions (fT3, fTestosterone) for example was a contributor beside many other things in my case, but there are legal hurdles to simply get replacement therapy where I live.

 

But overall, the elephant in the room with chronic disease I consider the myopic few on only the affected body system the largest hindrance to recovery, when at the same time the liver, the kidney, the hormonal glands, immunity, metabolism.. practically everything else is in survival mode. The more all those interacting systems are improved, the more likely remission with chronic diseases. As happened to mine with my multi-modal but individualized approach.



#32 longevitydiary

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 23 posts
  • 3
  • Location:usa

Posted Yesterday, 12:49 PM

It is obvious that most lab-tests improved (last time counted about 2500 data points) and that I experienced a number of remission with otherwise considered incurable disease. Mission impossible accomplished, but remaining proactive and attentive that it stays that way.

Therefore, no reason to speculate on causes, despite having reached the seemingly impossible very few would be able too

BMI or abdominal fat is ideal, and wasn't the cause of my chronic diseases to begin with. Lack of endogenous hormone productions (fT3, fTestosterone) for example was a contributor beside many other things in my case, but there are legal hurdles to simply get replacement therapy where I live.

But overall, the elephant in the room with chronic disease I consider the myopic few on only the affected body system the largest hindrance to recovery, when at the same time the liver, the kidney, the hormonal glands, immunity, metabolism.. practically everything else is in survival mode. The more all those interacting systems are improved, the more likely remission with chronic diseases. As happened to mine with my multi-modal but individualized approach.


Okay, thank you. We understand, this is an admirable effort.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#33 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Yesterday, 07:52 PM

Our proprietary formula consists of only one self-invented ingredient, and there are only two choices: yes or no.

 

A 'proprietary formula' is used to characterize a combination of ingredients in unknown quantities, to protect the intellectual property of the inventor. You before yourself said: of herbs with high quality extraction method.

 

Now you misapply this term for a self-invented sole, but undisclosed ingredient. A research chemical? - with no way for a customer to check the literature for its possible side effects?
 

 

Sorry for my critical questions. I only want to give a good opportunity for counterarguments. There is little trust in expert-opinion in the West.

 

 

 
 

 

 



#34 longevitydiary

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 23 posts
  • 3
  • Location:usa

Posted Today, 01:10 AM


A 'proprietary formula' is used to characterize a combination of ingredients in unknown quantities, to protect the intellectual property of the inventor. You before yourself said: of herbs with high quality extraction method.

Now you misapply this term for a self-invented sole, but undisclosed ingredient. A research chemical? - with no way for a customer to check the literature for its possible side effects?


Sorry for my critical questions. I only want to give a good opportunity for counterarguments. There is little trust in expert-opinion in the West.



1.Yes,it is based on the principles of traditional Chinese medicine, and we have invented a new extraction method. it is to protect the intellectual property of the inventor, one of our team’s traditional Chinese medicine doctors invented it. If it were disclosed, I believe countless substandard imitations would appear on the market the next day. Here is an article we wrote about actions to determine your own health. It is in Chinese, but interested readers can use browser tools to translate it.https://mp.weixin.qq...nw9WP-wQG28uutw
2.Our service selects 5 out of our invented CS001-CS010 formulations based on the user's longevity needs, with a different one taken each day to prevent resistance. Most of the responses from our service users are positive.
3.Whether there are side effects is only known by the traditional Chinese medicine doctor. Due to limited research, the side effects of traditional Chinese medicine extracts are rarely available from public sources."

#35 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Today, 10:44 AM

Thanks for the detailed answers.

 

Our proprietary formula consists of only one self-invented ingredient, and there are only two choices: yes or no.

 

We will customize proprietary formulas based on the user's situation. Each proprietary formula consists of only one ingredient, and users have only two choices: to choose our product or not to choose our product.

 

A 'proprietary formula' is used to characterize a combination of ingredients in unknown quantities, to protect the intellectual property of the inventor. You before yourself said: of herbs with high quality extraction method.

 

Now you misapply this term for a self-invented sole, but undisclosed ingredient. A research chemical? - with no way for a customer to check the literature for its possible side effects?

 

1.Yes,it is based on the principles of traditional Chinese medicine, and we have invented a new extraction method. it is to protect the intellectual property of the inventor, one of our team’s traditional Chinese medicine doctors invented it. If it were disclosed, I believe countless substandard imitations would appear on the market the next day. Here is an article we wrote about actions to determine your own health. It is in Chinese, but interested readers can use browser tools to translate it.https://mp.weixin.qq...nw9WP-wQG28uutw

 

Therefore, you actually meant 'No', to only one undisclosed - and therefore potentially dangerous research chemical?

 

And the one undisclosed ingredient is actually one herb already used in traditional Chinese medicine. But by keeping one ingredient and the extraction method undisclosed for protecting the invention, you are still using a combination of different Chinese medicine herbs in each of your proprietary formulas.

 

2.Our service selects 5 out of our invented CS001-CS010 formulations based on the user's longevity needs, with a different one taken each day to prevent resistance. Most of the responses from our service users are positive.

 

And you actually do individualize the regimen by combining some of your dozens formulas to a customer's needs.

 

Now, I also understand why you were concerned my continuous dosing would cause 'equal levels'. Here you call it resistance, With particular herbs this can happen, and in those cases also use wash-out periods. However, most of my regimens ingredients are vitamins, minerals (used or avoided), amino acids, many herbal and fruit extracts too. But the latter at much lower doses, and very few to rotate.

 

And in my case a water-fast along with dropping all supplementation for a few days, immediately brings up slight symptoms of intermittent claudication. Therefore, in my case with chronic diseases, obviously most of my remissions happen through continuous supplementation of dietary ingredients with specific pharmaceutical actions.

 

Now I've got a much clearer picture. Thanks.

 


Edited by pamojja, Today, 10:59 AM.


#36 alphachn

  • Guest
  • 9 posts
  • 2
  • Location:china

Posted Today, 11:18 AM

Thanks for the detailed answers.

 

 

 

 

 

Therefore, you actually meant 'No', to only one undisclosed - and therefore potentially dangerous research chemical?

 

And the one undisclosed ingredient is actually one herb already used in traditional Chinese medicine. But by keeping one ingredient and the extraction method undisclosed for protecting the invention, you are still using a combination of different Chinese medicine herbs in each of your proprietary formulas.

 

 

And you actually do individualize the regimen by combining some of your dozens formulas to a customer's needs.

 

Now, I also understand why you were concerned my continuous dosing would cause 'equal levels'. Here you call it resistance, With particular herbs this can happen, and in those cases also use wash-out periods. However, most of my regimens ingredients are vitamins, minerals (used or avoided), amino acids, many herbal and fruit extracts too. But the latter at much lower doses, and very few to rotate.

 

And in my case a water-fast along with dropping all supplementation for a few days, immediately brings up slight symptoms of intermittent claudication. Therefore, in my case with chronic diseases, obviously most of my remissions happen through continuous supplementation of dietary ingredients with specific pharmaceutical actions.

 

Now I've got a much clearer picture. Thanks.

That's one way to understand it.

 

I believe that true youthfulness is represented by the ability to perform movements just like young people, as demonstrated below.

 

https://mp.weixin.qq...nw9WP-wQG28uutw

Methods for Self-Assessing the Degree of Aging

 

Everyone wants to stay young and avoid aging, but we are all nourished by daily sustenance and are mere mortals. What we need to do is understand our body's condition, take early precautions, and delay diseases and aging. According to a study published in the British Medical Journal, the risk of death gradually increases starting around the age of 65 as physical functions decline. In fact, there are signs ten years before a person’s death, such as difficulty rising from a chair or dressing. Experts believe that early detection of changes in physical condition can help prevent accelerated aging. Further analysis of deceased participants shows:

  • 10 years before death, their sit-to-stand ability was poor;
  • 7 years before death, they self-reported poor physical function;
  • 4 years before death, their daily activities became more difficult;
  • In the final stage before death, their sleep quality was extremely poor, making it hard to fall asleep.

 

1.[Sit-Stand Ability Test]

The Sit-Stand Ability Test can assess the health of a person's ligaments, joints, and lumbar spine, particularly for middle-aged and elderly individuals. Stand in front of a chair, cross your arms over your chest, and repeatedly sit down and stand up. If an elderly person can complete 25 or more repetitions within 30 seconds, it indicates good lower limb bone and muscle strength; otherwise, it suggests lower limb muscle deterioration.

2.[One-Leg Standing with Eyes Closed]

According to the "National Physical Fitness Measurement Standards (2023 Revised)" published by the National Physical Fitness Monitoring Center, there is a test called the One-Leg Standing with Eyes Closed. This test is for adults aged 20 to 79 and should be carried out under safe conditions. During the test, close your eyes and lift one foot while the other foot stands on a hard, flat surface. Start timing to see how many seconds you can maintain this position. For middle-aged and elderly individuals aged 50 and above, the inability to stand on one leg with eyes closed for at least 10 seconds significantly increases the mortality risk by 84% within the next 4 to 9 years compared to those who can maintain balance for 10 seconds. If you are under 50 and cannot hold this position for 10 seconds, it is something you should take seriously.

 

3.[Sitting-Rising Test]

Sit cross-legged on the floor, then stand up without using your hands or knees for leverage or balance. This test is closely related to the likelihood of dying from various causes. If you can stand up without using your hands, forearms, knees, or one side of your leg, you score full marks. A landmark study published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology found that if an adult male or female can sit down and rise from the floor using only one hand—or even better, without using hands at all—they are not only at a higher level of musculoskeletal health but also have a longer life expectancy compared to others.

 

4.[Calf Raise]

Stand barefoot facing a wall, with your fingertips lightly touching the wall at shoulder height and your elbows slightly bent. Place your feet hip-width apart. Raise your heels as high as possible, lock your knees, then lower your body by bending your knees. Repeat the entire motion and count how many times you can do it within 30 seconds. Adults should aim to complete 25 calf raises in 30 seconds. A study published in the Journal of Sport and Physical Therapy found that adults who score highest in calf raises demonstrate higher levels of functional adaptability, strength, explosive power, speed, and range of motion.

 

5.[Push-Ups]

According to the American College of Sports Medicine, for women aged 20-40, being able to do 19-30 consecutive push-ups is considered good, while for men of the same age range, 21-36 is a good range. For individuals aged 50-60, completing 10-21 push-ups is considered good. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2019 found that adult men who cannot do at least 10 push-ups have a significantly higher risk of cardiovascular disease over the next ten years compared to those who can do more. Men who can do over 40 push-ups in one go have a 96% lower risk of heart disease in the next ten years compared to those who cannot do 10 push-ups.

6.[Fingers Touching Behind the Back]

Place your right hand over your right shoulder with fingers extended, and your left hand behind your back with fingers extended. If you can make your fingers touch, you score high. Otherwise, have someone measure the gap in centimeters between the fingertips of your middle fingers. Repeat the test by switching sides. Your goal is to get your fingertips as close to touching as possible on both sides. Researchers noted in Time magazine that shoulders and the trunk lose flexibility more quickly than elbows and knees, and men lose this flexibility faster than women. A study on clinical interventions in aging found that middle-aged women perform 20-40% better than men in this test.

 

7.[How Far Can You Walk in 6 Minutes?]

This test is a key indicator of endurance, aerobic capacity, cardiovascular, and lung health. The 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is an established aerobic capacity measurement method developed by the American Thoracic Society. If you cannot walk more than 350 meters on a flat route, it may indicate poor cardiovascular function and could be a sign of health issues such as respiratory or lung diseases, muscle loss, or underlying illnesses. Perform a 6-minute power walk (not a run) on a hard, flat surface and measure the distance walked. Ideally, your goal should be to cover a distance between 400 meters and 700 meters.

 

I scored full marks on all the tests mentioned above.

Attached Files

  • Attached File  640.gif   296.4KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  640 (1).gif   667.75KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  3.png   316.38KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  4.png   106.62KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  5.png   256KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  7.jpg   50.33KB   0 downloads
  • Attached File  6.png   412.66KB   0 downloads

Edited by alphachn, Today, 11:20 AM.


#37 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Today, 01:42 PM

A research chemical? - with no way for a customer to check the literature for its possible side effects?

 

Therefore, you actually meant 'No', to only one undisclosed - and therefore potentially dangerous research chemical?

 

 

That's one way to understand it.

 

You responded to different aspects of our conversation.

 

But thereby actually circumvented a clear 'yes' or 'no' to the question, twice. If there would be research chemical beside natural extracts in your formula.
 

How would you interpret such avoidance of a critical question?

 



#38 alphachn

  • Guest
  • 9 posts
  • 2
  • Location:china

Posted Today, 02:02 PM

You responded to different aspects of our conversation.

 

But thereby actually circumvented a clear 'yes' or 'no' to the question, twice. If there would be research chemical beside natural extracts in your formula.
 

How would you interpret such avoidance of a critical question?

In fact, I have indirectly answered this question. We are a team of traditional Chinese medicine doctors who have invented a method for herbal extraction. All of our formulas are based on herbal medicine, and therefore, they do not contain any chemical substances. However, I understand that people in the West might prefer a direct yes or no answer.


  • like x 1

#39 alphachn

  • Guest
  • 9 posts
  • 2
  • Location:china

Posted Today, 02:12 PM

 

How would you interpret such avoidance of a critical question?

The ways of thinking between Eastern and Western people differ, and thus the ways they answer questions also vary, much like the differences in how traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine treat diseases. Western medicine emphasizes locating the disease area, performing surgery, identifying specific targets, and finding a focal point. In contrast, traditional Chinese medicine seeks the underlying causes of the disease and addresses them to allow the affected area to self-heal.



#40 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Today, 02:40 PM

All of our formulas are based on herbal medicine, and therefore, they do not contain any chemical substances. However, I understand that people in the West might prefer a direct yes or no answer.

 

Thanks for addressing this important question directly.

 

The ways of thinking between Eastern and Western people differ, and thus the ways they answer questions also vary, much like the differences in how traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine treat diseases.

 

Don't think it is as easy as to excuse it with customs of social interactions anymore. Most research chemicals are easiest to procure from China or India, both in the East. As well, there are Westerners with Eastern thinking, wanting assurance their eastern approach isn't adulterated with ruthless western moneymaking. But enough Easterner after exactly that. :sad: Just as in the West.

 

Separating the chaff (scams) from the wheat therefore does require direct communication. In the West and the East.

 
 

 

 


Edited by pamojja, Today, 02:45 PM.


#41 alphachn

  • Guest
  • 9 posts
  • 2
  • Location:china

Posted Today, 02:58 PM


Thanks for addressing this important question directly.


Don't think it is as easy as to excuse it with customs of social interactions anymore. Most research chemicals are easiest to procure from China or India, both in the East. As well, there are Westerners with Eastern thinking, wanting assurance their eastern approach isn't adulterated with ruthless western moneymaking. But enough Easterner after exactly that. :sad: Just as in the West.

Separating the chaff (scams) from the wheat therefore does require direct communication. In the West and the East.
---



Most research chemicals are easiest to procure from China, not because they were invented by Easterners or are genuinely Chinese. Easterners produce these chemicals not because they recognize their efficacy, but to meet the demands of Westerners for profit.Westerners with Eastern thinking are just a minority and are not the mainstream.

"It is very difficult to identify scams.I know that many anti-aging substances invented by Westerners a few years ago have proven to have exaggerated efficacy over time. The lifespan of the mice in the experimental group was very short, less than 700 days (while normal mice live for about 900 days).

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for SUPPLEMENTS (in thread) to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#42 pamojja

  • Guest
  • 2,901 posts
  • 728
  • Location:Austria

Posted Today, 05:48 PM

Westerners with Eastern thinking are just a minority and are not the mainstream.

 
Beware of prejudices. I can meanwhile get certified organic products in Europe in almost every shop. Even organic grown tobacco (though rare). Those with chemical fertilizers, pesticides, fungicides and herbicides are of course still the majority of all products.
 
India I know well, also recently. No organic products widely available, only some rare exceptions. Earth, water. air - all polluted. Open fires of plastic waste everywhere, if not simply let to rod. Along with batteries, leaching toxic heavy metals. Almost all spring water contaminated. Farmers using only organic fertilizers there think their products are 'organic', while meanwhile they water from polluted springs, and batteries are decaying between the plants. Even academically trained aren't conscious of all the lurking dangers by thoughtless pollution everywhere.
 
China, when I was there in Xinjang and mainly Western Xizang in 1995, was at least then no different to India in this respect. Just took a quick look at air and water pollution situation in China now from Wikipedia (please correct, if wrongly portrayed):
 

Regulations such as the 1979 Environmental Protection Law are fairly stringent, though they are poorly enforced, frequently disregarded in favor of rapid economic development.%5B160%5D China has the second-highest death toll because of air pollution, after India, with approximately 1 million deaths.%5B161%5D%5B162%5D ...
 
 
The country has significant water pollution problems; only 89.4% of China's national surface water was graded suitable for human consumption by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment in 2023.%5B165%5D China has prioritized clamping down on pollution, bringing a significant decrease in air pollution in the 2010s.%5B166%5D

 
So seems to start to get better than it was.
 

.. but to meet the demands of Westerners for profit.Westerners

 
But nevertheless, there is much higher demand in the West for organic products, otherwise it wouldn't become available everywhere.
 
Outside large cities in China, is it possible to get independently certified organic food without driving too far nowadays?
 

Westerners with Eastern thinking are just a minority and are not the mainstream.

 

So yes, Westerners with Eastern thinking are a minority. Aren't Easterners with Eastern thinking nowdays in the East an even smaller minority?

 
 

 

 


Edited by pamojja, Today, 06:07 PM.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: longevity

4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users