2 replies to this topic

[osris]

Megadosing Vitamin C: A Case for Simplicity Over Micromanagement

 

By

 

ChatGPT

 

 

Vitamin C megadosing has long had its proponents—those who swear by high doses to fend off illness, boost immune resilience, or simply maintain vitality. Stories abound of people taking anywhere from a few grams to 100 grams per day during acute illness, with claims of fewer colds, faster recovery, and long-term health benefits.

 

But with high-dose vitamin C comes the inevitable conversation about regulation—how much is too much, and how do you know? Some suggest watching your urine color: if it turns bright yellow or fluorescent, your body is likely excreting the excess. Others recommend dialing back your dose if you notice diarrhea, burning sensations while urinating, or general digestive upset.

 

This introduces a kind of micromanagement that, for many, defeats the purpose of a simple daily health practice. Having to observe your urine, interpret the results, and adjust accordingly adds an unnecessary layer of complication to what should be an easy, straightforward routine.

 

The reality is: vitamin C is water-soluble. The body uses what it needs and discards the rest. Unless you’re taking truly massive doses—think 20+ grams daily over long periods—the risk of harm is minimal for most healthy individuals. And if your body tolerates your chosen dose (say, 5 grams a day) without unpleasant side effects, there’s little need to monitor things obsessively.

 

Moreover, urine color isn’t a reliable indicator of vitamin C levels. Hydration, B vitamins, medications, and even certain foods can alter its appearance. Relying on this as a feedback mechanism for dosing is not only imprecise—it can be misleading.

 

Of course, those with kidney conditions, a history of oxalate stones, or other specific health concerns may need to be more cautious. But for the average person, a steady, well-tolerated dose of vitamin C—taken daily without obsessing over it—is a reasonable, low-maintenance way to support general health.

 

In the end, the goal of supplementation should be to enhance life, not complicate it. If your routine requires constant surveillance and adjustment, it stops being a health aid and starts becoming a chore. For most people, a consistent dose that feels right, causes no discomfort, and fits seamlessly into their day is the most practical—and sustainable—approach.

 

[pamojja]

Please provide its sources, whenever providing suggestions of AI. Otherwise, you're just spreading merry tales with it.

 

Some suggest watching your urine color: if it turns bright yellow or fluorescent, your body is likely excreting the excess. Others recommend dialing back your dose if you notice diarrhea, burning sensations while urinating, or general digestive upset.

 

The common method, to find the sweet spot for high-dose ascorbic acid intake, is indeed titrating to bowel-tolerance only. The urine turns bright yellow for unrelated reasons (like high riboflavin intake). It turns watery with high ascorbic acid intake, since that necessitates many glasses of water to mix with and to drink. In many years, I found not one author, who recommended monitoring urine color for ascorbic acid intake. It's hallucinating.

 

The reality is: vitamin C is water-soluble. The body uses what it needs and discards the rest. Unless you’re taking truly massive doses—think 20+ grams daily over long periods—the risk of harm is minimal for most healthy individuals.

 

Some sensitive individuals have very low, much lower, bowel-tolerance, than 20 grams. Whether the individual bowel tolerance is at 2 g/d only, or at 200 g/d makes no difference. The sole harm is always the same: A watery diarrhea, which quits immediately once lowering the next dose again. Further symptom during approaching those highest dose might be flatulence. There is no more serious harm.

 

In the 16 years of my 25 g/d ascorbic acid intake, I experimentally explored my highest possible intake once, only. Because of my rhinitis, it is already without any other co-condition very high above 50 g/d.

 

And if your body tolerates your chosen dose (say, 5 grams a day) without unpleasant side effects, there’s little need to monitor things obsessively.

 

Beside titrating to bowel-tolerance - mentioning a watery stool with too high doses taken frequently - there is really no reliable obsessive monitoring of vitamin C intake. Most blood test are too unreliable. So this whole ChatGPT article is about a completely non-existent issue. There simply is no obsessive method to monitor vitamin C intake. Period.

 

Here ascorbic acid also is different to other nutrients, which do have clear co-factor nutrients at high enough doses, one should take care to take equally. Like Vitamin D3 with enough Mg. Also, the reason anyone would take 20-30 g/d of ascorbic acid, is mostly serious comorbid conditions. And those one better monitors with or without ascorbic acid intake anyway.

 

"Just take 20 g/d and don't obsess about it", is maybe well-meant. But practically no one would take the effort this takes, without serious life-threatening conditions. It's just too much effort in and of itself. Hallucinated is of course always easiest.

Edited by pamojja, Yesterday, 11:57 AM.

[osris]

Thanks for rude the reply, pamojja, after I had complemented a post you made in another thread. There's gratitude for you!

I’m aware you prefer a very specific framework when it comes to ascorbic acid use, and I respect that you've clearly invested years into fine-tuning your approach.

 

That said, the post I shared wasn’t intended as a clinical directive or deep-dive into orthomolecular protocols. It was a general commentary aimed at the average supplement user—people who are curious about high-dose vitamin C but not necessarily managing serious pathology or aiming for bowel-tolerance-level intakes.

 

On the urine color point: It wasn't presented as a scientific marker for C saturation, nor as a dosing guide—and only noted it as something “some suggest,” and went on to say clearly that it’s imprecise and potentially misleading. That context matters.

 

Regarding bowel tolerance, sure—many high-dose C users use it as a guide. But it’s not the only viable method for everyone. Plenty of people find a steady, well-tolerated dose (5g/day, for instance) and stick with it for general wellness, without the need to titrate up or micromanage every signal from the body.

 

Your response reaffirms your stance, which is fine. But dismissing an alternative perspective as “hallucinated” because it doesn’t match yours misses the point. Not everyone is navigating this at the level of pathology or in pursuit of therapeutic extremes. Sometimes, people just want a practical, low-friction routine—and that’s what this post was about.