Any thoughts?
http://www.aor.ca/re...ch/benagene.php
Posted 21 December 2006 - 03:50 PM
Posted 21 December 2006 - 04:57 PM
Posted 22 December 2006 - 01:56 PM
Posted 22 December 2006 - 02:06 PM
Posted 23 December 2006 - 06:34 PM
Posted 23 December 2006 - 07:11 PM
Posted 23 December 2006 - 10:24 PM
Posted 24 December 2006 - 02:49 AM
Posted 24 December 2006 - 03:01 AM
A.O.R. is selling beneGene.
Posted 24 December 2006 - 03:04 PM
Posted 24 December 2006 - 06:23 PM
Posted 24 December 2006 - 07:40 PM
Alan, thanks for posting. Ageless's post above sounded so much like an advert out of eastern europe that I ignored your website. (Sorry Ageless, I guess you were just excited... It does look interesting.) So Alan, when do you think that preprints might be available, particularly of the phase I human data?
Thanks Much,
George
Posted 24 December 2006 - 07:57 PM
Posted 25 December 2006 - 04:50 PM
Posted 25 December 2006 - 08:16 PM
Ok, I understood that the mechanism of BenaGene is increased NAD+:NADH ratio? Doesn't R-ALA likely also do that, does BenaGene have some additional benefits? Is there a danger of lactic acidosis as with high dose R-ALA (I am admittedly way over my expertise here but does not increased NAD+:NADH ratio lead to inceased lactate:pyruvate ratio too)?
Posted 25 December 2006 - 08:42 PM
Extremely high doses [of R- lipoic acid](over 6 gms/serving) may cause lactic acidosis.
Edited by opales, 25 December 2006 - 09:16 PM.
Posted 26 December 2006 - 03:33 AM
Hi,
On combining benaGene with resveratrol, we do not know if it has any benefit. One of the reasons for this lack of knowledge is the difficulty in detecting what resveratrol does in the body. As we understand it at this point (and subject to change at any point in time), resveratrol increases the rate that the Sirt1 protein reacts with it's substrate (affecting the Km), but does not necessarily increase either the transcription rate of the protein from the gene, nor the amount of protein in the cells. Thus, the effects are difficult to measure.
We have blocked the effect of the sir2 gene in worms with a compound call Splitomycin, and also fed them benaGene. The worms continued to live longer than the control group, but not as long as worms without the splitomycin. So there is a decrease when the sir2 gene is blocked, but only about a 1/3 decrease in the excess lifespan, indicating other genes are involved in the extension (at least in worms). There is also some controversy if Splitomycin is a good blocker for the sir2 gene, so we are looking closer at our results.
As to the competition, we do have some intellectual property filed, but we do expect that at least one of the key compounds goes generic soon. You can even order it from Sigma, and weigh it out yourself. If you do, however, please combine it with Vitamin C, as it effects the efficacy and safety. That is also part of our intellectual property.
On the other post as to due dilligence by AOR, they did an extensive review that primarily focused on safety and purity. Please note that the lifespan expansion in humans are not proven, and will not be for some time. But if you are a worm, a fly or a mouse, things look pretty good.... The glucose reduction effect has been proven in humans. The third party information is coming, but it takes awhile....
AOR is starting to sell benaGene now. Their webpage is currently being updated to reflect this.
Regards,
Alan Cash
Terra Biological LLC
acash@ix.netcom.com
Posted 26 December 2006 - 09:39 AM
Posted 26 December 2006 - 03:15 PM
Posted 26 December 2006 - 05:45 PM
ok AOR updated their page.
http://www.aor.ca/in...ts/benagene.php
http://www.aor.ca/in...ch/benagene.php
i wonder. the crmimic.ca guys state 200mg per cap... no specifics. AOR states 100mg vitamine C + 100mg oxaloacetic acid... that makes 200mg too... now do the crmimic.ca guys mean the same? Ah well...
Posted 26 December 2006 - 06:24 PM
ok AOR updated their page.
http://www.aor.ca/in...ts/benagene.php
http://www.aor.ca/in...ch/benagene.php
i wonder. the crmimic.ca guys state 200mg per cap... no specifics. AOR states 100mg vitamine C + 100mg oxaloacetic acid... that makes 200mg too... now do the crmimic.ca guys mean the same? Ah well...
Look at the dosages given at http://www.benagene....ucose_reduction . The doses are all over the place and though I haven't bothered to graph response to dosage, by eyeballing it, it looks like the dosage has little to do with the response. Of course we're dealing with ages and physical conditions which vary all over the place.
Notice at http://www.benagene....genomic_changes the Sirt1 and Sirt2 genes are left out. The Sert1 gene is the one upgregulated by resveratrol.
With respect to the price, well, USD 60/30 days is steep for the average supplement. Two things here. First off, this, if it turns out to be genuine, it is no ordinary supplement. It's sort of the Holy Grail we've been looking for. We should expect to pay extra for Holy Grails. I am not part of Tom/Paul Mathews/Wakfur bulk buy of resveratrol, but I do know that if you tried to mimic this sort of thing with resveratrol by buying lots of Longevinex (which will be shipping 100 mg. resveratrol in the new batch of capsules) or other sources, you'd be paying at least USD 2/day and probably quite a bit more if you wanted the resveratrol version of CR mimics. You'd be taking large doses of resveratrol, which has been /tested for toxicity/ in rats but it's something we don't really know the long term effects of in very large quantities. Myself, I /can/ afford this stuff, but /am/ suspicious. If there are some real clinical trials of this stuff in humans and the mechanism by which this stuff works gets explained to my satisfaction (e.g. why go after this particular part of the Krebs/Citric Acid Cycle?) then I'd be a buyer. As far as the price, competition can enter the market and it would be easy for others to offer a "me too" version of this, sans the Vitamin C, just as you can go most anywhere these days, buy R-ALA and ALCAR separately and take them together, thereby avoiding having to pay royalties to Ames.
If we get some more proof that this is the real deal, I would buy perhaps a couple years' supply of the Benagene product from AOR or whomever because I feel both an ethical obligation and an obligation to the spirit of discovery and research to pay the piper. The developers/people paying for the clinical trials deserve to be compensated for their efforts. I don't feel the same way about Ames' patent (though I cannot take R-ALA nor ALCAR because they make me too speedy and instantly insomniac) because I feel a different obligation to a researcher in education who's research is already funded.
What I am very excited about is that the Gaia effect (people interested and sometimes making independent but identical discoveries in different parts of the world has hit CR and weight management). There was the proposition made on sci.life-extension which there seemed to be agreement on that
"How does Sinclair know that the OPCs found in grape seed extract, for example, aren't far more effective than resveratrol in extending lifespan? Or how does he know pomegranate extract or rhubarb extract or citrus bioflavonoids like nobiletin aren't more effective? There are enough clues in the literature to suggest to any reasonable, informed person, that some of these compounds will extend lifespan."
The consensus was that Sinclair's research would prevent research on other approaches. I didn't believe that to be true, and thankfully it looks like I was right. The other exciting thing is the recent announcement of the research that's going to be published in Nature that there's a definite profile of bacteria found in the stomach of obese versus lean rats and humans. The study involved transferring the bacteria in the stomachs of obese rats to those of lean rats. The lean rats got fat. It was observed in humans that the profile of bacteria in the stomachs of obese people got closer and closer to the profile of bacteria in lean people as they dieted and lost weight. Now of course this is just an interesting study that needs to be repeated and has already been attacked as being pretty much useless with respect to the human obesity epidemic because that is caused by junk food and sloth, not bacteria. Nonetheless, I'm excited. I have this intuitive faith that Nature has kept things simple. We just need to find the little trick, like for example, discovering the value of NO (and thereby winning a Nobel Prize), that stomach ulcers are caused by a bacteria cured by an antibiotic and not the result of emotional makeup. I'm excited the way things are moving. I'm expecting someone to discover that things like BHP and baldness aren't caused by DHT afterall. That there's a much more simple explanation and preventative (maybe even cure?) and that DHT and all the complicated mechanisms being researched are just features (like stress in ulcers) that are throwing people off from discovering the truth. BTW, the active ingredients in Benagene, according to the AOR website, are found in abundance in red apples.
Posted 26 December 2006 - 08:25 PM
Posted 27 December 2006 - 06:04 PM
Posted 28 December 2006 - 04:40 AM
Posted 28 December 2006 - 07:05 AM
Now we're asking the right question.Where are the published, peer reviewed studies on Benegene?
Posted 29 December 2006 - 12:02 AM
ok AOR updated their page.
http://www.aor.ca/in...ts/benagene.php
http://www.aor.ca/in...ch/benagene.php
i wonder. the crmimic.ca guys state 200mg per cap... no specifics. AOR states 100mg vitamine C + 100mg oxaloacetic acid... that makes 200mg too... now do the crmimic.ca guys mean the same? Ah well...
Posted 29 December 2006 - 02:40 AM
Posted 29 December 2006 - 03:21 PM
Posted 29 December 2006 - 04:44 PM
What about Carnosine? Supposedly it overloads one of the cycles, too.
0 members, 48 guests, 0 anonymous users