Thanks for keeping the thread alive and posting your results. After re-reading the Sinclair and Auwerx papers, as well as the various Sirtris releases, I'm pretty convinced that conventional blood work will not demonstrate anything from resveratrol dosing. Perhaps c-reactive protein would make a decent biomarker since it is a marker/predictor of inflammation but I'm just hazarding a guess at this point. However, since my c-reactive protein was already quite low before I started resveratrol dosing, likely due to my EPA/DHEA regime, I won't be able to report anything meaningful on that one when I do have my checkup........
-Malbec
I've already got the test results back. My HMO has computerized their system, and what used to take weeks to report now takes less than 12 hours. The blood is barely dry on the gauze.
To the extent that I'm looking for cholesterol improvements as a marker for resveratrol increasing my longevity, the results are disappointing. They're back to almost exactly the levels they were in my last pre-resveratrol blood work a year before (August 2006):
Total Cholesterol: 129
Triglyceride: 130
HDL: 40
LDL calculated = 129 - 40 - 130/5 = 63
Glucose, fasting: 84
See previous results here.
My results are consistent with two theories:
1. Although resveratrol may increase lifespan and even protect the cardiovascular system, it has no effect on cholesterol -- supported by two papers discussed before; see here and here.
2. Or, Longevinex's claim is right, and their fancy nitrogen packaging preserves so much more resveratrol activity (or the synergistic effects with their other ingredients is so significant) that it's more cost-effective than the cheaper brands. I used Longevinex during (northern) spring but then bought cheaper products (RevGenetics and Country Life and a little NSI) when I went to a higher dosage. However, as I said above, I've seen modest improvements in weight, VO2 max, and blood pressure that seem to be sticking.
Looking forward to more data from the rest of you.