When I started this topic, I was unsure about iron. Now I definitely side with the lower than average argument for longevity (for men) - based on research in the last year or so - and if I am getting iron, it would be nice to have only heme iron.
Mind, I was wondering why Christiaan Leeuwenburgh focused on heme and non-heme levels of iron. I didn't know how to use his findings about heme&non-heme iron. Especially after I found this
article about non-heme ferritin produced abundantly by Helicobacter pylori. Adjusting your diet of plant based non-heme iron might not stop Helicobacter pylori from its abundant production(10 x normal). This is very interesting because all of this ties into the "inflammation" theory of heart disease. I saw one study that proved ROS iron damaged LDL. Helicobacter pylori is already implicated with heart disease. Oxidized LDL does damage the epithelial layer of the arteries. Its very interesting that ROS iron could be at the bottom of these problems.
Also the connection with sarcopenia caught my attention. At age 69 I have been looking for ways to battle that problem. All in all, Mind, thanks for the post you made.
So to find out if ferritin blood tests were of value I read his
article on Medplus. From the article -
"Rikans et al. also concluded that the increased sensitivity of hepatocytes from old rats to diquat was not because of changes in enzymatic mechanisms that protect against oxidative damage; rather, they found that hepatocytes from old rats were more sensitive to diquat because of higher levels of ferritin iron in the livers of the old rats [59]. In addition, a clinical study in a large sample of Japanese men and women demonstrated that the oxidative DNA damage measured by circulating 8-oxoGuo levels increased concurrently with serum ferritin levels in both sexes "
The Japanese study, which Leeuwenburg referenced, confirms the use of ferritin to measure the ROS risk. So, ferritin, is an objective measure of ROS activity. Maybe not the best, but only $28 at LEF.
In the article he mentioned the difficulty of isolating the reactive iron from the un-reactive iron. That probably drove his decision to measure heme & non-heme iron.
Edited by david ellis, 02 October 2008 - 06:36 PM.