
Optimal Ejaculation Frequency?
#31
Posted 23 April 2007 - 10:04 PM
My goal now is to reduce the frequency to 1/7 per day.
I have noticed a trend: the less porn that I look at, the less need I feel to ejaculate. I think that I am going to have to give up my daily routine of surfing the internet for porn.
#32
Posted 24 April 2007 - 01:28 AM
#33
Posted 24 April 2007 - 01:41 AM
Then you train yourself to fall asleep right after. Your lucky lady won't like that too much once you get around to intercourse with her,^maybe you can try to jerk it only right before you go to sleep? It's really the only thing that works for me when I need to hit the sack... melatonin does nothing and I don't mess with sleep aid drugs.
sponsored ad
#34
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:46 AM
#35
Posted 24 April 2007 - 02:53 PM
Yeah and I have the same problem taking too long to ejaculate when I have sex.
#36
Posted 24 April 2007 - 03:25 PM
I wonder if they come frequently to visit this thread. It would be funny if we ask them "how frequently do you come to this thread?"
I think they should participate in this topic and show us their little (or big) victoria secrets. [lol]
#37
Posted 24 April 2007 - 03:37 PM
#38
Posted 24 April 2007 - 03:39 PM
What are you doing guys [:o] !! You know, there are also girls in this forum.
I wonder if they come frequently to visit this thread. It would be funny if we ask them "how frequently do you come to this thread?"
I think they should participate in this topic and show us their little (or big) victoria secrets. [lol]
I was thinking very much the same thing about girls visiting this thread, most likely thinking WTF.
#39
Posted 24 April 2007 - 03:40 PM
#40
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:11 PM
Interesting, I thought that, given the way the various valves and tubes worked, one could not urinate and ejaculate at the same time. Can one of the anatomy experts confirm that his experience is anatomically possible?From previous experience, when I don't ejaculate for about 4 days my body does it automatically when I go for a number 1. Its very strange as there is no real orgasm but it does feel a little satisfying.
Yeah and I have the same problem taking too long to ejaculate when I have sex.
#41
Posted 24 April 2007 - 04:29 PM
Interesting, I thought that, given the way the various valves and tubes worked, one could not urinate and ejaculate at the same time. Can one of the anatomy experts confirm that his experience is anatomically possible?From previous experience, when I don't ejaculate for about 4 days my body does it automatically when I go for a number 1. Its very strange as there is no real orgasm but it does feel a little satisfying.
Yeah and I have the same problem taking too long to ejaculate when I have sex.
AFAIK, this should only occur if there was a nocturnal emission and there was still semen in the urethra.
Or, this, maybe.
#42
Posted 24 April 2007 - 05:23 PM
Sorry girls.

#44
Posted 02 May 2007 - 01:41 PM
#45
Posted 02 May 2007 - 04:07 PM
#46
Posted 04 May 2007 - 12:32 PM
Celibates can't masterbate?
I think the reason you might feel a spring in your step from not masturbating for a week is that you probably got bored, and letting things build up and get horny or whatever can be good and motivating.Think of the wars fought over women in the past, Antony and Cleopatra, absense making the heart grow fonder and so forth.
There are direct benefits from ejaculating, but also some subtle benefits from going without from time to time (much like fasting) that we probably can't measure.
#47
Posted 02 February 2009 - 04:34 PM
My dad practiced as a surgeon for a decade, and most of my dad's side are doctors or in med fields (mom's side mostly in business/ law-enforcement/gov/, trade). Most of them say the less the better, but seem to think there's no permanent harm. They inhibit my dating (basically didn't allow it), but don't care much ~masturbation.
I experimented
I notice no noot or "awakeness-stimulating" effects. Though there would be pent up energy (steadily built throughout period w/o semen-release) The longest time is ~4 weeks w/o ejaculating, eventually leading to night-emission, semen messing the bedsheets, big spot. The energy could be directed to studying/school-work/ working-out.
If I want less libido BUT STILL maintaining testosterone/Manliness/competitive levels, I would try CR first, as I notice when I fast or simply eat little, there's almost no libido.
Edited by HYP86, 02 February 2009 - 04:47 PM.
#48
Posted 02 February 2009 - 04:53 PM
there probably is no 'optimal' frequency for ejaculation, i would imagine it varies from person to person... i, and many other, note an increase in energy/motivation when masturbation induced orgasms are decreased (there are huge threads on this on mind & muscle). sex induced orgasms however, do not effect my energy levels.
#49
Posted 02 February 2009 - 10:22 PM
I suspect that most here are aware of the study(s?) which suggest that frequent ejaculation reduces the risk of prostate cancer. http://news.bbc.co.u...lth/3072021.stm
Just to be puzzled, a new study contradicts this one

Men who are very sexually active in their twenties and thirties are more likely to develop prostate cancer, especially if they masturbate frequently, according to a study of more than 800 men.
#50
Posted 03 February 2009 - 12:53 AM
From what I have read, there is a widespread perception that frequent ejaculation causes lethargy, yet all of the articles written by physicians seem to discount this perception as an unsubstantiated archaic belief.
Managers of boxers use to say much the same to their boxers. Recall Mickey warning Rocky to stay away from Adrian: "Women weaken legs!"
--------------
Randy Smith
#51
Posted 03 February 2009 - 01:46 PM
i think its important to note that the physiological response to ejaculation varies depending on if orgasm is induced by sex or masturbation... i've noted on multiple occasions that after sex i feel energized and after masturbation i feel tired.
I am skeptical about this assertion. I suspect most guys just don't know how to masturbate right.
#52
Posted 05 February 2009 - 07:10 AM
i think its important to note that the physiological response to ejaculation varies depending on if orgasm is induced by sex or masturbation... i've noted on multiple occasions that after sex i feel energized and after masturbation i feel tired.
I am skeptical about this assertion. I suspect most guys just don't know how to masturbate right.
Actually it is well known that orgasms make men feel tired. It is because of the release of prolactin. Intrestingly some studies have found real sex produces much more prolactin than masturbation
http://www.popsci.co...2/sex-and-sleep
It is also responsible for the loss of libido after sex, and multiple-orgasmic men seem not to release prolactin after orgasm.
http://www.nature.co...l/3900823a.html
#53
Posted 05 February 2009 - 01:31 PM
i think its important to note that the physiological response to ejaculation varies depending on if orgasm is induced by sex or masturbation... i've noted on multiple occasions that after sex i feel energized and after masturbation i feel tired.
I am skeptical about this assertion. I suspect most guys just don't know how to masturbate right.
Actually it is well known that orgasms make men feel tired. It is because of the release of prolactin. Intrestingly some studies have found real sex produces much more prolactin than masturbation
http://www.popsci.co...2/sex-and-sleep
It is also responsible for the loss of libido after sex, and multiple-orgasmic men seem not to release prolactin after orgasm.
http://www.nature.co...l/3900823a.html
Hmm, know of any supplements that suppress prolactin?
#54
Posted 05 February 2009 - 03:59 PM
Edited by FunkOdyssey, 05 February 2009 - 04:02 PM.
#55
Posted 05 February 2009 - 04:54 PM
<br /><br /><br /><br />Optimal Ejaculation Frequency, in my humble opinion, with no scientific basis, would be as often as possible without resorting to masturbation. If masturbation is your only option, then the optimal frequency would be the minimum necessary to prevent prostate issues or congestion (maybe once weekly).<br />
Why do you think avoiding masturbation is a good thing?
#56
Posted 05 February 2009 - 04:58 PM
Hmm, know of any supplements that suppress prolactin?
Tampering with hormones is not usually the best idea, and prolactin is likely the cause of some of the feelings of gratification after orgasm, and it has effects upon other hormones like testosterone and DHT, as well as neurotransmitters like dopamine. There are substances though, like ferulic esters, which have contradictory studies regarding prolactin regulation.
Of course there are also pharmaceuticals which can do the trick, but with risky side effects.
http://en.wikipedia....ne#Side_effects
Edited by progressive, 05 February 2009 - 05:03 PM.
#57
Posted 05 February 2009 - 05:08 PM
<br /><br /><br /><br />Optimal Ejaculation Frequency, in my humble opinion, with no scientific basis, would be as often as possible without resorting to masturbation. If masturbation is your only option, then the optimal frequency would be the minimum necessary to prevent prostate issues or congestion (maybe once weekly).<br />
Why do you think avoiding masturbation is a good thing?
Different physiological responses to masturbation vs. sex, body rewards the latter, former is just a waste of resources (time, energy, hormones, zinc, etc), undermines your drive and ability to have real sex with a real person.
#58
Posted 05 February 2009 - 05:39 PM
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Different physiological responses to masturbation vs. sex, body rewards the latter, former is just a waste of resources (time, energy, hormones, zinc, etc), undermines your drive and ability to have real sex with a real person.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why do you think avoiding masturbation is a good thing?&lt;br /&gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;Optimal Ejaculation Frequency, in my humble opinion, with no scientific basis, would be as often as possible without resorting to masturbation. If masturbation is your only option, then the optimal frequency would be the minimum necessary to prevent prostate issues or congestion (maybe once weekly).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;
Not mine. I enjoy both as frequently as possible, my body certainly rewards both, thank you very much, and I still have time, energy, hormones and zinc aplenty. (No employed person in a developed country needs to worry about conserving energy, nor worry about a zinc famine anytime soon.) And even if you had less drive to have sex with a real person (which is doubtful in a healthy male), what of it? People should have their fun in the ways that they prefer. Also, why should masturbation be a waste and partner sex not? I thought the western world had moved beyond that kind of attitude even if the catholic church hasn't.
Edited by andre, 05 February 2009 - 05:40 PM.
#59
Posted 05 February 2009 - 06:33 PM
#60
Posted 05 February 2009 - 11:04 PM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users