It's good that you took precautions to get bloodwork done. I'm not sure James Green's protocol is exactly comparable to what I did, because I think my dosage might have been materially higher. That might explain the noticeable reaction I had vs. you or someone else on a lower dose. Other than that, everyone can obviously react different to different substances.
I have seen one study that is somewhat disconcerting re: Prostate health and this type of molecule. I will send you a private email about it, because it is a confidential report. I am also in a higher risk category for prostate cancer due to an underlying inflammation etiology. I suggest you take omega 3 fish oil and other anti-inflammatory substances. Curcumin, omega-3s (Flax), ellagic acid (pomegrante) are good ways to fight prostate cancer risk and mitigate inflammation.
I cannot comment on the Testosterone/SBHG and lymphocyte issues, as I am not knowledgeable enough to make an informed judgement.
I've not put my finger on it entirely, but I think the nexus of the risk issue with Astragaloside IV/TA-65/etc. lies in how it transforms a cell to functioning in a more youthful state and where it may upregulate higher risk activities that the body would normally be trying to inhibit for protective (anti-cancer) reasons (be it oxidative stress/inflammation that damages the prostate). Astragaloside seems to upregulate PPAR-gamma and stimulation of this can have pro-inflammatory results (though the data is conflicting). I guess the way I think about it from a skeptical standpoint is that: We know a person who is anorexic/not eating well actually does inflammatory damage to their body when they go out and exercise. The seemingly positive activity of exercise becomes a negative, because you are creating stress on the body that isn't being managed properly (through nutrition/tissue repair). Is the same sort of thing occurring with this substance whereby you are improving the overall functionality of the cells in some areas, but not completely mitigating the inflammatory damage in others? It's very hard to say.
Again, I'm not 100% sure what is going on with this molecule and based on the the information put forth by the people at Geron/TA Sciences I'm not convinced they really know with 100% certainty either.
As a side note:
There is a lot of chatter on these boards about the Obama administration potentially regulating supplements and how that would be a negative for the industry. In my opinion, we clearly have a case where government intervention is welcomed. I would hope that if the government does regulate supplements that they make a beeline for the offices of TA Sciences and carefully go through what these people are doing. They are obviously motivated by money (that's no problem, everyone should be a capitalist at heart), but over history we have seen bad actors skirt the facts in favor of a quick buck to the detriment of others. In this regard, I think everyone on these forums should be cheering for government regulation of supplements, because it helps protect us from people operating on the fringe, like TA Sciences. It gives us confirmation or warning of what practices are happening, rather than letting us run around like guinea pigs and risking our own health.
time will tell
-pro
Edited by prophets, 03 April 2009 - 04:20 PM.