
William O'Rights
#391
Posted 26 February 2009 - 09:56 AM
This also is an 82.
Well the pic isn't loading.
#392
Posted 26 February 2009 - 09:59 AM
sponsored ad
#393
Posted 26 February 2009 - 10:04 AM
Let me see if this loads now. Cool it's loaded up, let me put old Grandaddy beside a pic of Jr.Here is one with black rims, looks even closer to what I had. What I liked about this bike was its performance over the Honda that I had. Both in cornering and in acceleration and speed. The kid who bought it new was very short, and the seat sat real low. That was another big factor for me because I couldn’t plant both feet to the ground with the Honda, so that made stops a little more challenging. Always balancing the bike to one side or another just increases the chance that you will drop the bike.
This also is an 82.
Well the pic isn't loading.
#396
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:59 AM
I've never owned a motorcycle, but I came across this last year and though it might make for an economical and elements resistent commuter machine.
Laz posted a machine that looked close, not as sporty as yours looks. The tag was 70k, that doesn't sound to economical. Sure, better in the rain but when you ride there isn't anything like open air.
#397
Posted 10 March 2009 - 02:25 PM
I've never owned a motorcycle, but I came across this last year and though it might make for an economical and elements resistent commuter machine.
Laz posted a machine that looked close, not as sporty as yours looks. The tag was 70k, that doesn't sound to economical. Sure, better in the rain but when you ride there isn't anything like open air.
Here's the Top Gear video to go with that picture.
#398
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:39 PM
I've never owned a motorcycle, but I came across this last year and though it might make for an economical and elements resistent commuter machine.
Laz posted a machine that looked close, not as sporty as yours looks. The tag was 70k, that doesn't sound to economical. Sure, better in the rain but when you ride there isn't anything like open air.
I figured that would be the argument from motorcycle enthusiasts.


The tag, if I remember correctly, was going to be something like $20K-$25K. They were going to introduce in California first (because California would not classify it as a motorcycle) and then try to get other states to change their laws.
I believe they have 3 versions planned. Two that are completely battery powered and one that is a hybrid, with a 6 gallon tank. These things get in the 100 mpg range for fuel consumption (not sure how they measure that for the fully battery powered ones...must use an average watt cost or something) and over 100 mph. No transmission needed either, so just a steady acceleration. I believe they do 0-60 in about 6 seconds. Not as fast as many bikes, but still plenty fast. That's about the same speed as my Volvo turbo sedan.
David
#399
Posted 10 March 2009 - 09:46 PM
I've never owned a motorcycle, but I came across this last year and though it might make for an economical and elements resistent commuter machine.
Laz posted a machine that looked close, not as sporty as yours looks. The tag was 70k, that doesn't sound to economical. Sure, better in the rain but when you ride there isn't anything like open air.
Here's the Top Gear video to go with that picture.
I can't see the video at my current location. If it is for the Carver, then I can add that the VentureOne (now named the Persu), which is the picture I posted, licensed the tilting technology from Carver.
d
#400
Posted 11 March 2009 - 01:34 AM
I can't see the video at my current location. If it is for the Carver, then I can add that the VentureOne (now named the Persu), which is the picture I posted, licensed the tilting technology from Carver.
d
The video isn't there. Pics of venture one, sure.
#401
Posted 11 March 2009 - 01:45 AM
I can't see the video at my current location. If it is for the Carver, then I can add that the VentureOne (now named the Persu), which is the picture I posted, licensed the tilting technology from Carver.
d
The video isn't there. Pics of venture one, sure.
Yup, it's the Carver.
You don't see the video ?
I see it in my post.
Here's a link.
sponsored ad
#402
Posted 11 March 2009 - 02:35 AM
I can't see the video at my current location. If it is for the Carver, then I can add that the VentureOne (now named the Persu), which is the picture I posted, licensed the tilting technology from Carver.
d
The video isn't there. Pics of venture one, sure.
Yup, it's the Carver.
You don't see the video ?
I see it in my post.
Here's a link.
I was able to see the video in your post. It was just blocked from where I was earlier in the day. I just watched it at home. Fun video.

David
Edited by davidd, 11 March 2009 - 02:35 AM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users