For some reason, the link seems to go the wrong page even though the address should be right.
Ok, here's the link again:
[2] The vaccine AN-1792 showed promise in mouse and early human trials, but in a 2002 Phase II trial, 6% of subjects (18 of 300) developed serious brain inflammation resembling meningoencephalitis, and the trial was stopped. In long-term followups, 20% of subjects had developed high levels of antibodies to beta-amyloid. While placebo-patients and non-antibody responders worsened, these antibody-responders showed a degree of stability in cognitive levels as assessed by the neuropsychological test battery (although not by other measures), and had lower levels of the protein tau in their cerebrospinal fluid. These results may suggest reduced disease activity in the antibody-responder group. Autopsies found that immunization resulted in clearance of amyloid plaques, but did not prevent progressive neurodegeneration.
Got it, finally. Here is the latest re-re-re-reassessment of this study, in the Lancet with a link that I tested after posting this. It actually sounds worse than you said, in the sense that "Seven of the eight immunised patients who underwent post-mortem assessment, including those with virtually complete plaque removal, had severe end stage dementia before death. In the whole cohort, there was no evidence of improved survival".
So if I combine this with what you quoted above, it sounds like: Amyloid is smoke, not fire. If you blow the smoke out of a burning building, then people inside it be able to function better in the short term, but the building will still collapse on them in essentially the same time period. Pragmatically, this means we should clear amyloid using only cheap and low-risk strategies, e.g. Longvida, EGCG, maybe turmeric; but we should redirect all amyloid research resources to tauopathy. Now we're back to ADNP, NAP (davunetide), and desparate stuff like insulin nasal spray. That's no fun because they only work in isolated regimes, it seems. If I had to bet my life on it (and I suppose we all are, to some extent), I'd put my money on LLLT/TULIP (thanks, lostfalco), nicotinamide riboside, and/or c60oo. I'd also make one very easy bet: we'll see the best tauopathy therapies on Longecity years before they appear at the doctor's office, if they ever do.
As disappointing as this is, you deserve credit for digging up the data. I'm surprised, frankly, that this doesn't seem to be more widely known, even in neurological circles. Maybe the vaccine will work well for certain narrow populations, but I think it's time to attack tauopathy head-on. Artificial neurons, anyone?
@ Mods: We seem to have problems with URLs containing "#" or "_", as above. Not sure.
Edited by resveratrol_guy, 04 December 2014 - 11:41 PM.