There are other topics on the board for currently available alternative and conventional cancer treatments (Fighting Cancer: http://www.imminst.o...showtopic=23038), nano-technology research (http://www.imminst.o...showtopic=21636) and many threads on particular treatments, people who are fighting cancer, etc. It seems it might be beneficial to have one location to post and discuss research and knowledge about cancer - what it is, how it functions, and why it starts. This would include posting studies that advance the knowledge about cancer and discussions about how to theoretically affect cancer with conventional and/or alternative means. "Fighting Cancer" should remain the main topic for known, available therapies. This will be the knowledge base of information *about* cancer itself.
Cancer Knowledge
#1
Posted 24 November 2008 - 04:47 PM
There are other topics on the board for currently available alternative and conventional cancer treatments (Fighting Cancer: http://www.imminst.o...showtopic=23038), nano-technology research (http://www.imminst.o...showtopic=21636) and many threads on particular treatments, people who are fighting cancer, etc. It seems it might be beneficial to have one location to post and discuss research and knowledge about cancer - what it is, how it functions, and why it starts. This would include posting studies that advance the knowledge about cancer and discussions about how to theoretically affect cancer with conventional and/or alternative means. "Fighting Cancer" should remain the main topic for known, available therapies. This will be the knowledge base of information *about* cancer itself.
#2
Posted 24 November 2008 - 04:51 PM
...
New Genes Linked To Lung Cancer In Large-scale Genetic Study
ScienceDaily (Oct. 23, 2008) — A multi-institution team, funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), today reported results of the largest effort to date to chart the genetic changes involved in the most common form of lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma. The findings should help pave the way for more individualized approaches for detecting and treating the nation's leading cause of cancer deaths.
In a paper published in the Oct. 23 issue of the journal Nature, the Tumor Sequencing Project (TSP) consortium identified 26 genes that are frequently mutated in lung adenocarcinoma -- an achievement that more than doubles the number of genes known to be associated with the deadly disease. But the pioneering effort involved far more than just tallying up genes. Using a systematic, multi-disciplinary approach, the TSP team also detailed key pathways involved in the disease, and described patterns of genetic mutations among different subgroups of lung cancer patients, including smokers and never-smokers.
More than 1 million people worldwide die of lung cancer each year, including more than 150,000 in the United States. Lung adenocarcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed form of lung cancer. The average 5-year survival rate currently is about 15 percent, with survival being longest among people whose cancer has been detected early.
"By harnessing the power of genomic research, this pioneering work has painted the clearest and most complete portrait yet of lung cancer's molecular complexities. This big picture perspective will help to focus our research vision and speed our efforts to develop new strategies for disarming this common and devastating disease," said NHGRI Acting Director Alan E. Guttmacher, M.D.
Like most cancers, lung adenocarcinoma arises from changes that accumulate in people's DNA over the course of their lives. However, little is known about the precise nature of these DNA changes, how they occur and how they disrupt biological pathways to cause cancer's uncontrolled cell growth. To gain a more complete picture, researchers have joined together to form TSP and other large, collaborative projects that are using new tools and technologies to examine the complete set of DNA, or genome, found in various types of cancer.
"We found lung adenocarcinoma to be very diverse from a genetic standpoint. Our work uncovered many new targets for therapy of this deadly disease -- oncogenes that drive particular forms of lung adenocarcinoma and tumor suppressor genes that would ordinarily prevent cancer cell growth," said Matthew Meyerson, M.D., Ph.D., a senior author of the paper. Dr. Meyerson is a senior associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard and an associate professor at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School.
In the new study, the TSP team purified DNA from tumor samples and matching non-cancerous tissue donated by 188 patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Next, they sequenced the DNA to look for mutations in 623 genes with known or potential relationships to cancer. Prior to the study, fewer than a dozen genes had been implicated in lung adenocarcinoma. The latest research identified 26 new genes that are mutated in a significant number of samples. Most of these genes had not previously been associated with lung adenocarcinoma.
Among the genes newly implicated in lung adenocarcinoma are:
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). Mutations in this gene have previously been shown to cause neurofibromatosis 1, a rare inherited disorder characterized by unchecked growth of tissue of the nervous system.
Ataxia Telengiectasia Mutated (ATM). ATM mutations have previously been shown to play a role in ataxia telangiectasia, which is a rare inherited neurological disorder of childhood, and in various types of leukemia and lymphoma.
Retinoblastoma 1 (RB1). Past research has tied RB1 mutations to retinoblastoma, a relatively uncommon type of childhood cancer that originates in the eye's retina.
Adenomatosis polyposis coli (APC). Mutations of this gene are common in colon cancer.
Ephrin receptors A3 and A5 (EPHA3 and EPHA5), neurotrophin receptors (NTRK1 and NTRK3) and other receptor-coupled tyrosine kinases (ERBB4, KDR and FGFR4). These genes code for cell receptors coupled to members of the tyrosine kinase family of enzymes, which are considered prime targets for new cancer therapies.
After identifying the genetic mutations, the team went on to examine their impacts on biological pathways and determine which of those pathways were most crucial in lung adenocarcinoma. Such research is essential to efforts to develop new and better treatments for cancer.
For example, TSP researchers found more than two-thirds of the 188 tumors studied had at least one gene mutation affecting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, indicating it plays a pivotal role in lung cancer. Based on those findings, the researchers suggested new treatment strategies for some subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma might include compounds that affect the MAPK pathway. One such group of compounds, called MEK inhibitors, has produced promising results in mouse models of colon cancer.
Likewise, the TSP's finding that more than 30 percent of tumors had mutations affecting the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway raises the possibility that the drug rapamycin might be tested in lung adenocarcinoma. Rapamycin is an mTOR-inhibiting compound approved for use in organ transplants and renal cancer.
In addition, the genetic findings suggest that certain lung cancer patients might benefit from chemotherapy drugs currently used to treat other types of cancer. For example, chemotherapy drugs known to inhibit the kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), such as sorafenib and sunitinib, might be tested in the relatively small percentage of lung adenocarcinoma patients whose tumors have mutations that activate the KDR gene.
In their Nature paper, TSP researchers also analyzed the patterns of genetic changes seen among different subgroups of lung adenocarcinoma patients, including smokers.
About 90 percent of lung cancer patients have significant histories of cigarette smoking, but 10 percent report no use of tobacco. In the TSP study, the number of genetic mutations detected in tumor samples from smokers was significantly higher than in tumors from never-smokers. Smokers' tumors contained as many as 49 mutations, while none of the never-smokers' tumors had more than five mutations. More work is needed to determine what these differences may mean for the management of lung cancer. However, doctors do know that in some other types of cancer, high mutation levels may cause a tumor to spread rapidly and/or be resistant to treatment.
"Our findings underscore the value of systematic, large-scale studies for exploring cancer. We now must move forward to apply this approach to even larger groups of samples and a wider range of cancers," said Richard K. Wilson, Ph.D., a senior author of the paper and director of the Genome Sequencing Center at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis.
The TSP team also included researchers from Baylor College of Medicine, Houston; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York; the University of Cologne, Germany; the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; and the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
"Clearly, much still remains to be discovered. We have just begun to realize the tremendous potential of large-scale, genomic studies to unravel the many mysteries of cancer," said Richard Gibbs, Ph.D., a co-author of the lung adenocarcinoma paper and director of the Human Genome Sequencing Center at Baylor College of Medicine.
The TSP data are complementary to those from other large-scale cancer genome studies, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project funded by NHGRI and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). In its pilot phase, TCGA is focusing on the most common form of brain tumor, called glioblastoma; a type of lung cancer called squamous cell lung cancer; and ovarian cancer. The first results from TCGA's glioblastoma study were published in the advance online edition of Nature on Sept. 4 and published in Nature's print edition on Oct. 23.
The co-publication of these comprehensive cancer genome studies should provide hope to millions of people and families living with cancer. By applying advanced genomic tools to the complexities of cancer, these studies have helped to untangle the biological roots of these diseases, which will accelerate efforts by the worldwide scientific community to improve outcomes for cancer patients.
...
#3
Posted 24 November 2008 - 06:39 PM
http://www.nutrition.../content/2/1/30
Skip down to the section sub-titled: Dietary Energy and Brain Cancer. Note that IMO this same ketogenic diet should apply to ANY cancer in the body, as ALL cancers have the same metabolic pathway, requiring glucose. Why oncologists do not force patients on a super-reduced-carb diet boggles the mind -- it's clearly one of the best weapons versus cancer.
#4
Posted 24 November 2008 - 08:59 PM
But perhaps the forum is not the right one? Shouldn't this be somewhere under Health and Nutrition?
#5
Posted 24 November 2008 - 11:45 PM
Great idea, I myself have been thinking about compiling a directory about alternative and conventional treatment and prevention methods for some time now.
But perhaps the forum is not the right one? Shouldn't this be somewhere under Health and Nutrition?
The Fighting Cancer (http://www.imminst.o...showtopic=23038) topic is the appropriate thread for those things. This one may cross over from time to time, but is more about how cancer works. In the discussion of how it works, it might be mentioned that therapy XYZ works by affecting gene ABC or chemical TUV, etc.
For example, in the page DukeNukem just referred to, we find the following:
...
In contrast to malignant brain tumors that are largely dependent on glycolysis for energy, normal neurons and glia readily transition to ketone bodies (β-hydroxybutyrate) for energy in vivo when glucose levels are reduced. The bioenergetic transition from glucose to ketone bodies metabolically targets brain tumors through integrated anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, and pro-apoptotic mechanisms.
...
My translation:
Brain cancer requires simple sugars to stay alive. Although healthy cells can feed off simple sugars, they do not *require* it and can adjust to use ketone bodies (by-products created when fatty acids are used in other parts of the body for energy) when simple sugars are reduced. Thus, one way to make life hard on cancer cells is to slowly switch to a diet that lowers the amount of simple sugars in the blood and increases the amount of fatty acids. Doing this not only serves to starve the cancer (pro-apoptotic), but also has beneficial side effects of lowering production of free radicals (which lowers inflammation) and reduces the creation of new blood vessels (anti-angiogenic), due to the fact that the cancer cell metabolism is being slowed down and blood vessel development is tied to the cell metabolism. These new blood vessels would be used to support the unlimited growth and metastasis that cancer is known for. In summary, this technique tries to make it difficult for cancer to survive and grow, but allows healthy cells to survive, since they are more adaptable than cancer cells.
One analogy would be to imagine I have two cages. One contains a horse and the other contains a raccoon. You make available to both of them meat and plants to eat. The horse only eats the plants, but the raccoon may eat some of both. If you then change the diet to only include the meat, the raccoon happily continues to eat the meat. The horse can't eat the meat, so it gets sick and dies. (And yes, I'm guessing the raccoon would develop some nutrition problems, but probably not before the horse died.)
In this analogy, the horse represents cancer and the raccoon represents the healthy cells. The raccoon (healthy cells), being an omnivore, can adjust its diet and survive. The horse (cancer) cannot.
So what we learn from all this is that cancer cells loves simple sugars and people who have cancer might do well to avoid simple sugars or those foods that may be converted to simple sugars. The idea is to increase fat intake and lower carbohydrate intake in a monitored fashion. The body does still need some carbohydrates.
This is exactly what I was hoping would come out of this topic. Although some of us might have come across this type of information before, I think it is good to collect it in one place, explain it as best we can for others (feel free to correct me if I've said anything incorrect above) and discuss how it fits into the big picture. In this case, if we can shrink cancer or at least halt its growth, that buys time and/or allows for mechanisms that may not be feasible for cancer that has spread far and wide.
In the information I posted, it requires a bit more analysis, since they are talking about specific genes involved in cancer. Now we can theorize about what may upregulate/downregulate the genes involved or make correlations between those genes and existing therapies to better understand what it takes to affect cancer.
As for the location of this topic, I'll leave that to the powers that be. I put it in the same location as the Fighting Cancer topic. I couldn't find another area that didn't seem more geared toward life extension. If there is a better place, feel free to relocate it. The Health and Nutrition area has Supplements and Lifestyle forums. If there was a Disease forum in there, and a Cancer subforum, then this could be a topic under that subforum.
David
#6
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:08 PM
Ruta gravoleons (rue) is part of this eye drops which I use
occasionally for computer eye strain. So is Conium maculatum
(hemlock,) which was found ineffective in the prostate cancer trial.
http://www.similasan...-eye-relief.cfm
Note that the first study was done at the MD Anderson
Cancer Center.
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.funpecrp....3_full_text.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.homeopath...rch.html#Cancer
http://findarticles....251/ai_n6112666
http://findarticles....251/ai_n6112660
http://findarticles....68/ai_n15893079
http://findarticles....ust/ai_78177232
http://ons.metapress...41/fulltext.pdf
http://ons.metapress...04/fulltext.pdf
#7
Posted 22 December 2008 - 05:30 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm....t_uids=17109253
Angelica :
http://www.ncbi.nlm....t_uids=15867250
Oleander :
http://www.ncbi.nlm....t_uids=11001386
http://www.saludintegral.hn/
Selenium :
http://www.ncbi.nlm....t_uids=17390030
#8
Posted 25 December 2008 - 07:44 PM
1. Amrubicin (Calsed) - third-generation anthracycline
2. Topotecan (Hycamtin, SN38) - topoisomerase 1 inhibitor
3. Imatinib (Gleevec, STI571) - tyrosine kinase (c-kit) inhibitor
4. Zoledronate (Zometa), bisphosphonate
5. Vitamin K2 as MK4
6. Solifenacin (Vesicare) or darifenacin (Enablex), M3 muscuranic
receptor blockers.
7. Simavastatin (Zocor, statin)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topotecan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imatinib
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://cat.inist.fr/...psidt=16256191S
http://202.239.155.2...002/no_006.html
Imatinib is ineffective against SCLC by itself, and should
be given together with zoledronate and/or MK4, and
preferably with topotecan.
#10
Posted 01 January 2009 - 06:12 PM
Diflunisal (Dolobid), aspirin derivative :
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
Baclofen, GABA analog. Note that withdrawal should be tapered.
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://en.wikipedia....drawal_syndrome
#11
Posted 03 January 2009 - 07:34 PM
#12
Posted 04 January 2009 - 06:19 PM
#13
Posted 04 January 2009 - 06:23 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
#14
Posted 04 January 2009 - 06:28 PM
http://cebp.aacrjour.../full/9/11/1171
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
Edited by tham, 04 January 2009 - 06:44 PM.
#15
Posted 04 January 2009 - 06:58 PM
http://grouppekurosawa.com/blog/
(If you read this blog, read from bottom to top. Impressive testimonials.)
http://www.scienceda...80825132111.htm
http://cancerres.aac.../full/65/5/1984
http://www.nature.co...l/2403107a.html
General info: http://www.chm.bris....ne/jasminev.htm
#16 Guest_Shinigami_*
Posted 05 January 2009 - 12:35 AM
I've been reading about Methyl Jasmonate, and there appears to be real science and human results behind this cancer fighter/cure. A lot of links and references from this site.
http://grouppekurosawa.com/blog/
(If you read this blog, read from bottom to top. Impressive testimonials.)
http://www.scienceda...80825132111.htm
http://cancerres.aac.../full/65/5/1984
http://www.nature.co...l/2403107a.html
General info: http://www.chm.bris....ne/jasminev.htm
I read the blog too now, and it looks really promising.
Makes me wonder, how much methyl jasmonate is contained in green jasmine tea (e.g.: http://www.twinings....s_hotspots.asp)?
Would that be useful to any extent?
#17
Posted 06 January 2009 - 05:18 PM
(LLC1, H520 and H522 are NSCLC lines.)
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
#18
Posted 06 January 2009 - 10:35 PM
I've been reading about Methyl Jasmonate, and there appears to be real science and human results behind this cancer fighter/cure. A lot of links and references from this site.
http://grouppekurosawa.com/blog/
(If you read this blog, read from bottom to top. Impressive testimonials.)
http://www.scienceda...80825132111.htm
http://cancerres.aac.../full/65/5/1984
http://www.nature.co...l/2403107a.html
General info: http://www.chm.bris....ne/jasminev.htm
Can you or someone else put into layman terms how the Methyl Jasmonate works (dummy's guide to necrosis (if I am remembering correctly how it works))?
Trying to keep the topic about how cancer develops, how it works, how various things can kill it, etc. and most importantly, provide this information in an easily digested format for those who are not up on the lingo (like myself).
Thanks for contributing Duke. I haven't had a chance to read all the information, but from one of William's threads, what I saw did look promising. As I was discussing with him, it seems like getting cancer killing compounds to the cancer is the key and if you have something in your lungs, it makes common sense to inhale it to get it to enter the body as close to the main tumor as possible to avoid the body processes that reduce the potency of the treatment chemicals.
Thanks Tham, as well!
David
#20
Posted 13 January 2009 - 06:38 PM
New study supports Warburg theory of cancer.
His theory that cancer starts from irreversible injury to cellular respiration eventually fell out of favor amid research pointing to genomic mutations as the cause of uncontrolled cell growth.
Seventy-eight years after Warburg received science's highest honor, researchers from Boston College and Washington University School of Medicine report new evidence in support of the original Warburg Theory of Cancer.....
......In contrast to healthy cells, which generate energy by the oxidative breakdown of a simple acid within the mitochondria, tumors and cancer cells generate energy through the non-oxidative breakdown of glucose, a process called glycolysis. Indeed, glycolysis is the biochemical hallmark of most, if not all, types of cancers. Because of this difference between healthy cells and cancer cells, Warburg argued, cancer should be interpreted as a type of mitochondrial disease.......
.......Abnormalities in cardiolipin can impair mitochondrial function and energy production. Boston College doctoral student Michael Kiebish and Professors Thomas N. Seyfried and Jeffrey Chuang compared the cardiolipin content in normal mouse brain mitochondria with CL content in several types of brain tumors taken from mice. Bioinformatic models were used to compare the lipid characteristics of the normal and the tumor mitochondria samples. Major abnormalities in cardiolipin content or composition were present in all types of tumors and closely associated with significant reductions in energy-generating activities.
The findings were consistent with the pivotal role of cardiolipin in maintaining the structural integrity of a cell's inner mitochondrial membrane, responsible for energy production. The results suggest that cardiolipin abnormalities "can underlie the irreversible respiratory injury in tumors and link mitochondrial lipid defects to the Warburg theory of cancer," according to the co-authors.
Can any of the bio-experts here, explain in better detail how CL content in Mitos eventually could lead to cancer. They seem to be saying that poor mito function leads to cancer somehow, but I couldn't get my head around it. Just that cells with poor respiration are more prone to genetic mutation and cancer?
#21
Posted 13 January 2009 - 08:10 PM
I never heard of the Warburg theory of cancer before.
New study supports Warburg theory of cancer.His theory that cancer starts from irreversible injury to cellular respiration eventually fell out of favor amid research pointing to genomic mutations as the cause of uncontrolled cell growth.
Seventy-eight years after Warburg received science's highest honor, researchers from Boston College and Washington University School of Medicine report new evidence in support of the original Warburg Theory of Cancer.....
......In contrast to healthy cells, which generate energy by the oxidative breakdown of a simple acid within the mitochondria, tumors and cancer cells generate energy through the non-oxidative breakdown of glucose, a process called glycolysis. Indeed, glycolysis is the biochemical hallmark of most, if not all, types of cancers. Because of this difference between healthy cells and cancer cells, Warburg argued, cancer should be interpreted as a type of mitochondrial disease.......
.......Abnormalities in cardiolipin can impair mitochondrial function and energy production. Boston College doctoral student Michael Kiebish and Professors Thomas N. Seyfried and Jeffrey Chuang compared the cardiolipin content in normal mouse brain mitochondria with CL content in several types of brain tumors taken from mice. Bioinformatic models were used to compare the lipid characteristics of the normal and the tumor mitochondria samples. Major abnormalities in cardiolipin content or composition were present in all types of tumors and closely associated with significant reductions in energy-generating activities.
The findings were consistent with the pivotal role of cardiolipin in maintaining the structural integrity of a cell's inner mitochondrial membrane, responsible for energy production. The results suggest that cardiolipin abnormalities "can underlie the irreversible respiratory injury in tumors and link mitochondrial lipid defects to the Warburg theory of cancer," according to the co-authors.
Can any of the bio-experts here, explain in better detail how CL content in Mitos eventually could lead to cancer. They seem to be saying that poor mito function leads to cancer somehow, but I couldn't get my head around it. Just that cells with poor respiration are more prone to genetic mutation and cancer?
Or maybe that genetic mutation leads to the cardiolipin abnormalities, which then cascades into glycolysis?
From wikipedia's entry on cardiolipin, we get:
...
Cardiolipin is a "double" phospholipid because it has four fatty acid tails, instead of the usual two. While most lipids are made in the endoplasmic reticulum, cardiolipin is synthesized in the mitochondria themselves, on the matrix side of the inner mitochondrial membrane.
...
So not only is it used in the mitochondria, it is also created there, lending more support for mitochondria DNA damage possibly being implicated in cancer.
I also found this article discussing more about why Warburg was probably right.
...
The proposal that mtDNA mutations and respiratory dysfunction may be linked directly to carcinogenesis via apoptotic or reactive oxygen species (ROS)–mediated pathways is challenging, but urgently needs experimental proof. Questions regarding whether the HIF-mediated pathway is also initiated in hypoxia and mitochondrial deficiency [17], both characteristics of tumors, also need to be clarified. If these pathways are confirmed as being involved in tumorigenesis, metabolic targeting (e.g., blocking the HIF-pathway by administration of α-ketoglutarate) of the mitochondrion in cancer may open up new avenues to antineoplastic therapies and prevention of cancer.
....
Great addition to the thread, Mind. Thank you.
And yes, if anyone can put all of this in simple terms, that would be great.
David
#22
Posted 13 January 2009 - 09:06 PM
http://jnci.oxfordjo...full/96/24/1805
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
Along with a study that concludes that Ras inhibition downregulates HIF-1 and causes glycolysis to shut down and cancer cells to die.
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
BTW, the little nasty HIF-1 also stimulates VEGF...
HDAC inhibitors are potent inhibitors of HIF-1
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
Sulindac, Curcumin, Caffeine, Sulphorophane are all HDAC inhibitors...but beware, some HDAC inhibitors can increase Nf-Kappa, so you need Methyl Jasmonate, or another Nf-Kappa inhibitor combined with the HDAC inhibitor.
#24
Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:37 PM
Cow's milk .
http://jn.nutrition....full/127/6/1055
I haven't had time to look at all the stuff that has been posted, but this one caught my eye. I love the simple "Cow's milk" line.
David
#25
Posted 14 January 2009 - 06:59 PM
http://www.alligator...1130_cancer.txt
Also, bovine lactoferrin has all sorts of positive immune enhancing effects (significantly increased production of IL-18, systemic NK cell activation, ) systemically:
http
://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/queryd....=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
#26
Posted 19 January 2009 - 09:46 AM
http://www.medscape....warticle/562663
http://annonc.oxford.../full/18/9/1529
#27
Posted 03 February 2009 - 05:45 PM
used in Eastern Europe. The Atkins Center was at one time
giving it. American Biologics in Tijuana as well. Quite expensive.
This Vancouver clinic is giving it at $386 per 20 mg injection
once or twice a week.
http://www.pannaturo...com/ukrain.html
http://www.pannaturo...om/feesnew.html
http://proukrain.com/dosage.html
http://www.ukrain.ua...sent/img32.html
http://www.ukrain.ua...sent/img14.html
http://en.wikipedia....iki/Chelidonium
http://www.ralphmoss.com/ukrain.html
http://www.biomedcen.../1471-2407/5/69
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
#28
Posted 23 February 2009 - 04:24 PM
#29
Posted 23 February 2009 - 06:45 PM
associated with oral cancer. "
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
Netherlands Cohort Study.
" ..... a lower lung carcinoma risk was observed
in the highest onion intake category compared to the lowest
consumption category. "
" A higher lung carcinoma risk was observed for those subjects
who used exclusively garlic supplements compared to those not
taking dietary supplements. "
http://www.ncbi.nlm....l=pubmed_docsum
24 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 24 guests, 0 anonymous users