<br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.
Posted 30 November 2009 - 07:04 PM
<br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
Posted 30 November 2009 - 07:10 PM
Always the peacemakerTheFountain - why are you so upset?
Posted 30 November 2009 - 09:31 PM
<br />
<br /><br />I'm not entirely convinced that a paleo diet will lead to a youthful appearance (and perhaps raw food vegetarianism leads to a youthful look at a cost), but still, there are a hell of a lot more long-term vegetarians in the civilized world than there are long-term paleo dieters. It's a new thing. Where are the people who have been on paleo diets for 30 years? They aren't.<br />No, they don't. You are just making that up because you're associating junk foodetarians with this kind of vegetarian diet. Now go do your work and show me some oldish paleo dieters who look young for their ages. So far I have not seen one and you have seen several from the other side. The score cards are not marked in your favor.
What 'cost'? Please stop talking unsubstantiated crap. Raw food diets are the healthiest diets available both on the cellular level and in terms of enzyme and bodily metabolism. The visual evidence speaks for itself. Yes, looks matter. Stop saying they don't or that they don't point to healthy diets when we all know they do. We are talking about people who, without plastic surgery, without extensive skin care regimens, look way younger than their chronological ages and who have been eating raw food diets for decades. Coincidence? If you actually think so I feel sorry for your ignorant mind.
Posted 30 November 2009 - 09:36 PM
<br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.
Posted 30 November 2009 - 11:21 PM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????<br />He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)<br />It's not all about da face mister.<br /><br /><br />What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.<br /><br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
Edited by TheFountain, 30 November 2009 - 11:21 PM.
Posted 30 November 2009 - 11:24 PM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Settle down Beavis<br /><br /><br />What 'cost'? Please stop talking unsubstantiated crap. Raw food diets are the healthiest diets available both on the cellular level and in terms of enzyme and bodily metabolism. The visual evidence speaks for itself. Yes, looks matter. Stop saying they don't or that they don't point to healthy diets when we all know they do. We are talking about people who, without plastic surgery, without extensive skin care regimens, look way younger than their chronological ages and who have been eating raw food diets for decades. Coincidence? If you actually think so I feel sorry for your ignorant mind.<br /><br />
<br /><br />I'm not entirely convinced that a paleo diet will lead to a youthful appearance (and perhaps raw food vegetarianism leads to a youthful look at a cost), but still, there are a hell of a lot more long-term vegetarians in the civilized world than there are long-term paleo dieters. It's a new thing. Where are the people who have been on paleo diets for 30 years? They aren't.<br />No, they don't. You are just making that up because you're associating junk foodetarians with this kind of vegetarian diet. Now go do your work and show me some oldish paleo dieters who look young for their ages. So far I have not seen one and you have seen several from the other side. The score cards are not marked in your favor.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 02:18 AM
<br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.
Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????
He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)
It's not all about da face mister.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 04:52 AM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Settle down Beavis<br /><br /><br />What 'cost'? Please stop talking unsubstantiated crap. Raw food diets are the healthiest diets available both on the cellular level and in terms of enzyme and bodily metabolism. The visual evidence speaks for itself. Yes, looks matter. Stop saying they don't or that they don't point to healthy diets when we all know they do. We are talking about people who, without plastic surgery, without extensive skin care regimens, look way younger than their chronological ages and who have been eating raw food diets for decades. Coincidence? If you actually think so I feel sorry for your ignorant mind.<br /><br />
<br /><br />I'm not entirely convinced that a paleo diet will lead to a youthful appearance (and perhaps raw food vegetarianism leads to a youthful look at a cost), but still, there are a hell of a lot more long-term vegetarians in the civilized world than there are long-term paleo dieters. It's a new thing. Where are the people who have been on paleo diets for 30 years? They aren't.<br />No, they don't. You are just making that up because you're associating junk foodetarians with this kind of vegetarian diet. Now go do your work and show me some oldish paleo dieters who look young for their ages. So far I have not seen one and you have seen several from the other side. The score cards are not marked in your favor.
Whatever you say BUTT HEAD!
Posted 01 December 2009 - 04:53 AM
<br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.
Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????
He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)
It's not all about da face mister.
Every Paleo website and book should have a picture of Mark Sisson as a warning label.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 04:58 AM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????<br />He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)<br />It's not all about da face mister.<br /><br /><br />What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.<br /><br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
Lots of middle aged men have muscle. Doesn't mean they look young. All it takes is commitment and proper dieting. Which brings me to this point. No one said the paleo diet is not a decent momentary dietary scheme for body builders. We are discussing diets which slow down the aging process not just those which keep biomarkers within acceptable ranges or add muscle to you. So far we see no evidence that the Paleo diet slows down senescence. And quite a bit of visual and even some clinical evidence (IGF-1 studies) that vegetarian raw food diets may indeed slow down certain aspects of the aging process.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 05:12 AM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????<br />He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)<br />It's not all about da face mister.<br /><br /><br />What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.<br /><br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
Lots of middle aged men have muscle. Doesn't mean they look young. All it takes is commitment and proper dieting. Which brings me to this point. No one said the paleo diet is not a decent momentary dietary scheme for body builders. We are discussing diets which slow down the aging process not just those which keep biomarkers within acceptable ranges or add muscle to you. So far we see no evidence that the Paleo diet slows down senescence. And quite a bit of visual and even some clinical evidence (IGF-1 studies) that vegetarian raw food diets may indeed slow down certain aspects of the aging process.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 05:16 AM
Posted 01 December 2009 - 01:14 PM
<br /><br /><br /><br />
<br /><br />Speaking of ignorance, would you not say Mark Sisson's body, not face, looks much younger than his age????<br />He's in better shape than almost all men his age (55 YO)<br />It's not all about da face mister.<br /><br /><br />What gives you the impression I am upset? I am tired of ignorance, but far from upset.<br /><br />TheFountain - why are you so upset?<br />
Lots of middle aged men have muscle. Doesn't mean they look young. All it takes is commitment and proper dieting. Which brings me to this point. No one said the paleo diet is not a decent momentary dietary scheme for body builders. We are discussing diets which slow down the aging process not just those which keep biomarkers within acceptable ranges or add muscle to you. So far we see no evidence that the Paleo diet slows down senescence. And quite a bit of visual and even some clinical evidence (IGF-1 studies) that vegetarian raw food diets may indeed slow down certain aspects of the aging process.
Lot's of middle age men look young who don't have muscle. Your point proves nothing.
Edited by TheFountain, 01 December 2009 - 01:15 PM.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 02:15 PM
Posted 01 December 2009 - 08:40 PM
What 'cost'? Please stop talking unsubstantiated crap. Raw food diets are the healthiest diets available both on the cellular level and in terms of enzyme and bodily metabolism. The visual evidence speaks for itself. Yes, looks matter. Stop saying they don't or that they don't point to healthy diets when we all know they do. We are talking about people who, without plastic surgery, without extensive skin care regimens, look way younger than their chronological ages and who have been eating raw food diets for decades. Coincidence? If you actually think so I feel sorry for your ignorant mind.
Posted 01 December 2009 - 09:11 PM
Posted 01 December 2009 - 11:45 PM
Which leads me to ask whether or not excess muscle over time somehow contributes to aging or at least the outward appearance of such. In fairness though stallone looks about 45 in this picture here but he is taking large amounts of HGH well his face looks 45 but his body looks like that of a muscular 60 year old.
Edited by VidX, 01 December 2009 - 11:48 PM.
Posted 02 December 2009 - 05:42 AM
Which leads me to ask whether or not excess muscle over time somehow contributes to aging or at least the outward appearance of such. In fairness though stallone looks about 45 in this picture here but he is taking large amounts of HGH well his face looks 45 but his body looks like that of a muscular 60 year old.
Well Sly hasn't been a bodybuilder actually. I mean - he lifted his whole life, but something was wrong with his diet or style of workouts as he hardly ever looked "buff", just shredded to bone (what does imply that his diet wasn't all that good). Later he tore his pec (you can see it in the pic). Probably some early joint problems too (improper lifting of hereditary tendencies) as he could get bigger and a lot more toned at the same time while lifting heavy, on all that gh and test, but from what I've seen his workouts are light and intense (like he's trying to compensante for not being able lift heavy). So while he looks really good here, there are plenty of guys his age who look a LOT better, body-wise. He should work his legs BTW, as from the pics I've seen recently, they look like a toothpicks, compared to a decent upper body lol..
Posted 02 December 2009 - 10:47 AM
Hardly ever looked buff??? You ever seen some of the later Rocky movies? Rambo? He's no Pee Wee Herman....lol
Posted 02 December 2009 - 04:47 PM
Hardly ever looked buff??? You ever seen some of the later Rocky movies? Rambo? He's no Pee Wee Herman....lol
lol.. well probably my eyes are "adjusted" in kind of a different way after almost 10years in bb'ing. WHat I wanted to say - he probably never was big enough to start with, as guys who manage to become impressively big, usualy manages to keep a lot of that size to their old age if takes the right approach. and Sly was just very well toned and conditioned, so he managed to keep some of that too, just on a lower level.
Posted 03 December 2009 - 07:29 AM
ha would you stop there all on the good stuff as in dbol deca etc steriods they live on it you wont get big unless u juice up simple as
Edited by VidX, 03 December 2009 - 07:30 AM.
Posted 06 December 2009 - 02:20 AM
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:16 AM
Your looks on Paleo diet.
http://images.quickb...SC1626.JPG?a=55
http://images.quickb...C18592.JPG?a=53
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:31 AM
Edited by Forever21, 07 December 2009 - 08:31 AM.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:45 AM
http://www.cnn.com/2...iggs/index.html
http://blog.ibelieveinfitness.com/
43 yo
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:48 AM
Edited by DrEvil, 07 December 2009 - 08:51 AM.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:51 AM
I have posted some pics of myself before and the pcis received a lot of criticism, but have not seen photos of other members..??
Edited by Skotkonung, 07 December 2009 - 09:06 AM.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 10:00 AM
Posted 07 December 2009 - 11:11 AM
Edited by VidX, 07 December 2009 - 11:12 AM.
Posted 07 December 2009 - 08:55 PM
I have posted some pics of myself before and the pcis received a lot of criticism, but have not seen photos of other members..??
Hmm, I'm confused, isn't it a bit irrelevant if you look young, rather if you feel young or can compete physically with someone who is young? Else why would you care about what this forum is all about?
Edited by Matt, 07 December 2009 - 09:01 PM.
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users