Live interview with Aubrey De Grey of the SENS Foundation, Sunday April 19th, 6pm eastern, 2200 GMT
Watch here: Sunday Evening Update Channel
Imminst TV
From Wikipedia:
Aubrey David Nicholas Jasper de Grey (born 20 April 1963 in London, England) is an English biomedical gerontologist.
De Grey is the author of the mitochondrial free-radical theory of aging, and the general-audience book Ending Aging, a detailed description of how regenerative medicine may be able to thwart the aging process altogether within a few decades. He works on the development of what he has termed "Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence" (SENS) - a tissue-repair strategy intended to rejuvenate the human body and thereby allow an indefinite lifespan. To this end, he has identified seven types of molecular and cellular "damage" caused by essential metabolic processes; SENS is a proposed panel of therapies to repair this damage.[1]
De Grey has been interviewed in recent years in many news sources, including CBS 60 Minutes, BBC, the New York Times, Fortune Magazine, the Washington Post, TED, Popular Science and The Colbert Report. His main activities at present are as chairman and chief science officer of the Methuselah Foundation[2] and editor-in-chief of the academic journal Rejuvenation Research.
Q&A with Aubrey from the Methuselah Foundation Website:
1. Get to the point. How long do you think I could live?
The answer to that question is of course very speculative, because it depends enormously on (a) how fast the research goes and (b) how long one is naturally predisposed to live even without these advances. I've said in the past that the first person to live to 1000 was probably born by 1945, and the first person to live to 150 probably by 1935, but those are people who would naturally live to 110. Conversely, lots of people are not predisposed to live beyond 70, and they have very little chance of benefiting from these therapies if they are already 50 or older.
Because of this uncertainty, I find it preferable (both for myself and when discussing this with others) to think not so much in terms of how long I can expect to live, but instead to focus on three other things:
1. Whatever one's probability may be of living to a given age, one will increase that probability by acting to hasten the research and by looking after one's own health.
2. Younger people obviously have a better chance of benefiting, since they're be more likely to still be alive when the therapies arrive, so if you don't think your chances are very good, focus on the fact that your kids' chances will be improved if we accelerate this work.
3. Globally, 100,000 people die of aging every day. Thus, if we can bring the defeat of aging even one day closer by our actions today, we'll save 100,000 lives. If we advance it by a year, we save 35 million lives. These are pretty staggering numbers, and pretty good reasons to get our act together without delay.