Can somebody please update me on the status of homocysteine. I talked to my doctor the other day regarding my high value (now >16 umol/L). He told me not to worry, because homocysteine has been removed from the list of relevant markers 2 years ago.
I'm pretty sure he's wrong. It's not
the marker, but it's toxic in vitro, correlates with endpoints in most epidemiologic trials and lowering homocysteine (if you're high to begin with) is benefical (e.g. (1)). The last thing I've read in the literature is that we can't tell yet, because some big RCTs are still under way (but it's definitely less important than we believed it to be).
However, possible risks of high dose folic acid should be taken into account when supplementing to reduce homocysteine. There may be some pretty serious risks for instance:
"...prostate cancer [incidence]
over a 10-year period was 9.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.5% to 14.5%) in the folic acid group and 3.3% (95% CI = 1.7% to 6.4%) in the placebo group (age-adjusted hazard ratio = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.23 to 5.65, Wald test P = .01)" (2)
Does anyone remember who warned us of folic acid some time ago?
I don't get why your homocysteine increased? Any ideas?
(1) Stroke. 2009 Mar;40(3):730-6. Epub 2008 Dec 31.
High-dose B vitamin supplementation and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis: a randomized controlled trial.
Hodis HN, Mack WJ, Dustin L, Mahrer PR, Azen SP, Detrano R, Selhub J, Alaupovic P, Liu CR, Liu CH, Hwang J, Wilcox AG, Selzer RH; BVAIT Research Group.
(2) J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Mar 18;101(6):432-5. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
Folic acid and risk of prostate cancer: results from a randomized clinical trial.
Figueiredo JC, Grau MV, Haile RW, Sandler RS, Summers RW, Bresalier RS, Burke CA, McKeown-Eyssen GE, Baron JA.
Edited by kismet, 15 May 2009 - 10:17 AM.