I hope this is not too off-topic here; I saw no forum that looked like a perfect fit.
I have seen several pieces in the news media regarding longevity. Unfortunately, the coverage has either negative (against longevity) or misinformative. Take this recent piece from Good Morning America on ABC News:
Fountain of Youth: Chinese Valley Brings Long Life
http://gmy.news.yaho...0614_gma_kerley
If anyone is interested in preserving this video, please capture the above video stream and post a more permanent link. I would do it myself, but I am using public terminals to access the Internet these days.
The story above was branded "China's Fountain of Youth" on "Good Morning Yahoo!".
These days, news anchors will often feign ignorance, and even stupidity, when reporting on any social issue. The writers clearly know what they are talking about, however, because they made sure to debunk alkalinized water by stating that a possible reason for the local longevity is the water, which is naturally low in alkaline. They also made sure to use terms like "fountain of youth" and "magic", and even references to ancient Chinese quackery (herbal "medicine") and... wait for it... snake oil. (They didn't say it was oil, per se, but they strongly emphasized that they drink a tonic made from snakes.) All of these things, in my opinion, would make a reasonable person reject the idea that environmental factors can affect life expectancy.
The one grain of truth was the bit about genetics playing the major role. Yet they seemed to go out of their way to avoid talking about anything that would upset their sponsors, such as a diet without fast food, food additives and highly processed foods, or possibly reduced levels of certain toxins, pesticides and industrial wastes.
So what do you think? Should there be a thread about how the media portrays living longer than 100?
Edited by Mr. Jingles, 16 June 2009 - 03:39 PM.