data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5707c/5707ce424cf372bc1286f3e478d944a3d73b46f9" alt=":)"
One called "Let's Not Be Afraid To Talk About Death"
http://www.telegraph...bout-death.html
A whole blog about Death amongst other stuff!
http://www.thedeathw...blogspot.co.uk/
Posted 17 May 2012 - 12:24 PM
Posted 21 May 2012 - 10:16 AM
Posted 31 May 2012 - 09:44 PM
Posted 07 June 2012 - 06:07 AM
Posted 07 June 2012 - 12:48 PM
Posted 08 June 2012 - 05:57 AM
Posted 08 June 2012 - 12:44 PM
Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:06 PM
Posted 11 June 2012 - 07:43 PM
Posted 12 June 2012 - 05:45 AM
Brilliant.I commented at the links of your posts 68 and 69 here now.
Posted 12 June 2012 - 06:00 AM
Posted 12 June 2012 - 12:48 PM
Posted 14 June 2012 - 06:41 PM
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:53 PM
Posted 19 June 2012 - 03:21 AM
"All of our fabulous technologies depend upon dwindling resources that we’ve uncovered here on Earth, like the ancient waste of creatures that’s morphed into crude oil. So while futurists claim that biological immortality has never looked so possible, the only planet known to sustain biological life has never looked more creaturely. Never has the hope for immortality looked so hubristic and foolish."
Posted 19 June 2012 - 05:54 AM
Maybe if we were here long enough, we'd stop grabbing what we can because we knew the end of the road would be upon us so quickly."All of our fabulous technologies depend upon dwindling resources that we’ve uncovered here on Earth, like the ancient waste of creatures that’s morphed into crude oil. So while futurists claim that biological immortality has never looked so possible, the only planet known to sustain biological life has never looked more creaturely. Never has the hope for immortality looked so hubristic and foolish."
http://www.religiond...o_live_forever/
Posted 20 June 2012 - 05:57 AM
Edited by Droplet, 20 June 2012 - 05:58 AM.
Posted 21 June 2012 - 06:02 AM
Posted 22 June 2012 - 06:03 AM
Posted 24 June 2012 - 03:02 AM
Posted 24 June 2012 - 03:14 AM
An article how getting old can mean being productive..someone needs to stomp on those rose tinted specs! Yes, there may be some good but someone needs a heads up about the myriad of bad:
http://www.ktvq.com/...ght-be-awesome/
Posted 24 June 2012 - 05:48 PM
Religion? I'd much rather place my faith in science and technology saving me than religion that is unprovable. I'm not saying there is or isn't a God but at least science has some testable and provable theories in it. After all, when you go to a doctor he doesn't go and ask God to heal you, he uses substances that have been proven in tests to work. This in itself is a form of life extension and is ever-evolving to enable us to live a lot longer than if we relied on nature alone."It is a kind of ideology, almost a religion, and is much more prevalent in the US than in the UK. It is in part an overconfidence in technology from the 20th century, and has got mixed up with science fiction."
"My charge against immortalism is that it is wasteful"
"The indignation that people express at not getting their pensions until they're 67 shows that the idea of a life cycle is firmly rooted"
Posted 24 June 2012 - 05:54 PM
Posted 24 June 2012 - 07:29 PM
An article about a 104-year-old mother looking after her 87-year old daughter with dementia:
http://www.dailymail...7-dementia.html
Posted 24 June 2012 - 07:53 PM
An article about aging and dying in US. Space for comments like "why the heck are we letting this happen." It is quite a horrible article:
http://www.guardian....death-revisited
“The death of our elderly parents – especially if they are suffering from dementia – has rarely been a subject that writers or editors want to touch. It's too much of a downer. But no more is that the case.”
“In her classic 1963 expose of the funeral industry, The American Way of Death, Jessica Mitford noted how much of a contributory factor Americans' desire to euphemize death was. The opposite is the case with Loh, Wolff, and Klein.“
“What Loh, Wolff, and Klein have done – at considerable personal pain to themselves – is help make clear-headed consideration of such exits more possible and permissible than ever before.”
They think we should kill off the dying closer to the beginning of the start of the debilitation and pain rather than at the end. They can’t fathom that maybe the cure for pain is to cure the pain and not lop off the head and push the animal into a hole. They are proud of these three for coming out and writing articles espousing this solution, saying that,
“Since last March, three essays on dying parents, the first in the Atlantic by radio talk-show host Sandra Tsing Loh, the second in New York by media columnist Michael Wolff, the third in Time by political reporter Joe Klein, have drawn widespread attention and mark a new trend,”
Let that inspire us all, because if three people with really bad solutions can be thought to change the trend in thinking on this issue, we, with the actual solutions can surely do it. Let’s stick with it. Let’s stick with the blogs and the articles and the things like this internet networking team so we can continue to help spread this vital message.
Edited by brokenportal, 24 June 2012 - 07:53 PM.
Posted 25 June 2012 - 06:05 AM
Posted 26 June 2012 - 06:03 AM
Edited by Droplet, 26 June 2012 - 06:08 AM.
Posted 27 June 2012 - 06:05 AM
Posted 27 June 2012 - 04:42 PM
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users