
Piracetam and FDA
#61
Posted 18 February 2010 - 12:28 AM
#62
Posted 18 February 2010 - 02:27 AM
I'd imagine shelf life at 2-3 years without issue.
sponsored ad
#63
Posted 18 February 2010 - 08:18 AM
Just theorizing about a weird situation, of course. I think I'll probably stock up myself, if there's even a chance this is leading to regulatory action. For me, piracetam is an important part of a strategy to avoid adderall. So again, thanks mike, even if it turns out to be something else.
I'm just finishing up a 1fast400 tub that is at least 2 years old, and I don't see any difference in efficacy with the brand-new stuff some friends have. Despite what one person said here recently, it doesn't oxidize when exposed to air repeatedly (well, at least its appearance doesn't change in any way). Though for long-term storage, I would definitely seal up what isn't being used, it will probably prolong its shelf life.
Edited by chrono, 18 February 2010 - 08:22 AM.
#64
Posted 18 February 2010 - 05:01 PM
Just an FYI - Senator Mc Cain is behind all this FDA crap http://www.capwiz.co...l...781&type=CO
All the more reason to vote him out during the primary.
#65
Posted 19 February 2010 - 06:04 AM
It's more in their interests to keep the population as dumb as possible, because of the way Americans are conditioned through the supposed "freedom of speech" and the illusion of having "rights"...Around here they can sell all the noots you want because no matter how smart or stupid you are there's a 99% chance you already know that the KGB runs this shit and you may want to just be a good boy

So maybe they don't want people smartening up to their bullshit and want to keep everyone dumbed down IMO. I find it hilarious because piracetam has been used ALL throughout Europe since about the late 70's if not earlier...so you know they've got a different agenda.
Anyways, if you fly to Russia and pay me some cash, I'll meet you at the airport and take you noot shopping right from the passport control

#66
Posted 19 February 2010 - 09:06 AM
Anyways, if you fly to Russia and pay me some cash, I'll meet you at the airport and take you noot shopping right from the passport control
I may take you up on that offer one day... Finland is pretty close!
#67
Posted 23 February 2010 - 03:28 PM
I've started back on the Piracetam and find it brilliant for mental energy.
If it does get banned I'll have to take the plunge and buy 3 kg from SP. Being in the UK it'd be a killer on import duty though.
#68
Posted 24 February 2010 - 06:08 PM
#69
Posted 25 February 2010 - 11:01 AM
We generally mark our internationals at half price.
I know Mike, I heard about your new website from when you were posting as Primaforce on the dog maybe 18 months ago and ordered then

#70
Posted 25 February 2010 - 08:14 PM
Just got another call from them. Having a meeting tomorrow so they can ask more questions and give me some paperwork.
Mike, I think you need to call your congressman or whatever small government advocate you can find. I'm sure not too many people are aware and light needs to be shed on this. Fight it.
As for me, I'm stocking up. How long of a shelf life does this stuff have?
"One year" however, temperature controlled, sealed package, no light- probably much much longer. 10 years? Synapse may be able to say.
I really think big pharma is behind this trying to get it made available only via prescription, despite the fact that there is so much backing to it. How quickly can it be made illegal? I mean, look at OBVIOUSLY new illegal substances- it takes at LEAST 2 months, with 30 days of public notice.
Edited by Jurence, 25 February 2010 - 08:21 PM.
#71
Posted 28 February 2010 - 01:31 AM
I think that supplement makers have to find a loophole in the laws that may come about with the impending bill.
The FDA (although named the Food and Drug Administration) does not really have much jurisdiction with foods. This is why DSHEA was such a victory because supplements were classified as foods, thus eliminating the cumbersome meddling of those bafoons from the FDA.
With the new bill, nutritional supplement companies may have to do away with "supplements" altogether and just call these nutritional products "food" or "functional food."
I don't know... I know that it sounds like wild-eyed conspiracy theory, but I don't think that the FDA are too concerned with the safety of dietary supplements as much as they are concerned with the safety of big pharma profits.
We always talk about "freedom" in this country- "we're fighting in Iraq for freedom", "we're restoring freedom and democracy around the world", etc- yet our most basic freedoms are being usurped from us right in front of our noses.
If anything, this bill will only make supplements more dangerous. It may seem ironic, but i think its true. You'll always be able to get every one of these supplements- hell, you can score pure heroin on the street if you want to. This bill will only drive nutritional supplement companies underground where all hell might break loose.
#72
Posted 28 February 2010 - 05:13 AM
It helps me sleep at night knowing there are people like you still left on this earth. Thought I was the only one.I think that these supplement manufacturers will adapt to these laws. I mean, it certainly seems inevitable that eventually the government will try to take our health freedom away. It's happened in Europe, Canada, Australia, etc. To think that it won't happen here is ridiculous.
I think that supplement makers have to find a loophole in the laws that may come about with the impending bill.
The FDA (although named the Food and Drug Administration) does not really have much jurisdiction with foods. This is why DSHEA was such a victory because supplements were classified as foods, thus eliminating the cumbersome meddling of those bafoons from the FDA.
With the new bill, nutritional supplement companies may have to do away with "supplements" altogether and just call these nutritional products "food" or "functional food."
I don't know... I know that it sounds like wild-eyed conspiracy theory, but I don't think that the FDA are too concerned with the safety of dietary supplements as much as they are concerned with the safety of big pharma profits.
We always talk about "freedom" in this country- "we're fighting in Iraq for freedom", "we're restoring freedom and democracy around the world", etc- yet our most basic freedoms are being usurped from us right in front of our noses.
If anything, this bill will only make supplements more dangerous. It may seem ironic, but i think its true. You'll always be able to get every one of these supplements- hell, you can score pure heroin on the street if you want to. This bill will only drive nutritional supplement companies underground where all hell might break loose.
#73
Posted 28 February 2010 - 10:41 PM
#74
Posted 01 March 2010 - 10:14 AM

Pretty crazy stuff though, around here they sell all kinds of pills without prescription because the pharmacy wants to maximize its profits, and stuff like benzos, tramadol, anti-psychotics, and other "hardcore pharmaceuticals" are only sold strictly prescription-only in state-run pharmacies, and kept in safes (I'm not kiddin, they were opening a big ol' vault with huge locks when I was shopping for Clonazepam and Tramadol one day)
So it's not like they ever have to worry about getting in trouble in the privately-run ones.
The US is going a different route - trying to outlaw a class of drugs so the others rake in more profits...go figure

Edited by russianBEAR, 01 March 2010 - 10:15 AM.
#75
Posted 01 March 2010 - 05:12 PM
Well I figure I gotta side with big pharma here, since there's a slightly bigger chance then of people taking me up on my offer above
)))
Pretty crazy stuff though, around here they sell all kinds of pills without prescription because the pharmacy wants to maximize its profits, and stuff like benzos, tramadol, anti-psychotics, and other "hardcore pharmaceuticals" are only sold strictly prescription-only in state-run pharmacies, and kept in safes (I'm not kiddin, they were opening a big ol' vault with huge locks when I was shopping for Clonazepam and Tramadol one day)
So it's not like they ever have to worry about getting in trouble in the privately-run ones.
The US is going a different route - trying to outlaw a class of drugs so the others rake in more profits...go figure
Because teenagers get high off of antipsychotics. Lol.
#76
Posted 01 March 2010 - 05:34 PM
#77
Posted 05 March 2010 - 04:56 AM
Edited by skylined, 05 March 2010 - 04:58 AM.
#78
Posted 05 March 2010 - 05:53 AM
#79
Posted 06 March 2010 - 11:27 AM
Haloperidol and Cyclodol in combination is a viable hallucinogen used by quite a few drug addicts around here. You don't wanna take one without the other thoughWell I figure I gotta side with big pharma here, since there's a slightly bigger chance then of people taking me up on my offer above
)))
Pretty crazy stuff though, around here they sell all kinds of pills without prescription because the pharmacy wants to maximize its profits, and stuff like benzos, tramadol, anti-psychotics, and other "hardcore pharmaceuticals" are only sold strictly prescription-only in state-run pharmacies, and kept in safes (I'm not kiddin, they were opening a big ol' vault with huge locks when I was shopping for Clonazepam and Tramadol one day)
So it's not like they ever have to worry about getting in trouble in the privately-run ones.
The US is going a different route - trying to outlaw a class of drugs so the others rake in more profits...go figure
Because teenagers get high off of antipsychotics. Lol.

You can also get Phenazepam (a Russian benzo, which is horrible, but a benzo nonetheless) pretty much over the counter as well.
Pretty much Russia's got the craziest druggies...ever though of taking Levodopa in between meth "marathons" so you can get more high on speed later ?

#80
Posted 06 March 2010 - 10:22 PM

Haloperidol and Cyclodol in combination is a viable hallucinogen used by quite a few drug addicts around here. You don't wanna take one without the other though

You can also get Phenazepam (a Russian benzo, which is horrible, but a benzo nonetheless) pretty much over the counter as well.
Pretty much Russia's got the craziest druggies...ever though of taking Levodopa in between meth "marathons" so you can get more high on speed later ?

[/quote]
#81
Posted 13 March 2010 - 12:24 AM
Is it a case of using haloperidol to damp down the raving delirium produced thusly, or using the antimuscarinic to damp down nasty ass extrapyramidal side effects of haloperidol (which I have read can cause non-schizophrenic people to go completely bonkers) ?
Russianbear, have you tried phenazepam personally? I know its long acting as hell, it isn't used here in the UK, but I've been thinking of aqquiring a gram or two myself, how does it compare to more common ones, from what I have read its potency is up there with the triazolo-ring substituted benzos, like triazolam, alprazolam etc, but half life more in common with diazepam and clonazepam.
Edited by Lestat Rett, 13 March 2010 - 12:29 AM.
#82
Posted 16 March 2010 - 06:57 AM
Edited by chrono, 16 March 2010 - 07:01 AM.
#83
Posted 16 March 2010 - 09:15 AM
Looking at the structure of 'cyclodol' it looks like an antimuscarinic, if my SAR knowhow is anything to go by, damn, thats...lets just say it isn't a combination I would fancy myself.
Is it a case of using haloperidol to damp down the raving delirium produced thusly, or using the antimuscarinic to damp down nasty ass extrapyramidal side effects of haloperidol (which I have read can cause non-schizophrenic people to go completely bonkers) ?
Russianbear, have you tried phenazepam personally? I know its long acting as hell, it isn't used here in the UK, but I've been thinking of aqquiring a gram or two myself, how does it compare to more common ones, from what I have read its potency is up there with the triazolo-ring substituted benzos, like triazolam, alprazolam etc, but half life more in common with diazepam and clonazepam.
The consensus here is that phenazepam is crap. I tried it many times and it gives me this nasty chemical aftertaste like Phenotropyl only worse, and it's pretty much something to have as a last resort kind of thing, if you're having some seizure or something or overdone stimulants...Sure the potency is right around where Valium is, but you don't get nowhere near as clean of an effect from it.
Valium is a much "smoother" substance, and Clonazepam is by far the best (but most addicting) benzo, not counting Roofies, which I think are illegal everywhere but Estonia nowadays

The triazolo-ring benzos as far as I remember are usually shorter acting, but produce a better euphoria. This one is in the category of long-acting benzos, but it is completely trumped even by Valium, so if you can get that, or get clonazepam but don't get hooked

By the way, did anyone have their body start rejecting benzos completely ? At some point I just couldn't take any more benzos - I'd throw up mucus for 48 hours and barely feel any effect, while my friends were taking the exact same batch of pills saying everything is just fine. I get that side effect that affects about 0.1% of all users according to the clonazepam manual.
Go figure it is strange, but it's like that with every benzo and I just can't take em anymore though I used to eat em like candy

#84
Posted 16 March 2010 - 11:12 AM
I do have some diazepam, can get access to temazepam, diazepam etc no problem, although benzos that metabolise to oxazepam induce in me a delayed paradoxical reaction of a stimulating type sometimes.
sponsored ad
#85
Posted 18 March 2010 - 01:01 AM
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users