Thanks for posting that. The bottom line is; if you are taking the best Resveratrol product available and you are getting side effects that you can actually attribute to Resveratrol use and no other cause, you probably should stop, then resume. If the sides continue then drop it from your regimen. IMO the benefits far outweigh any transient or tolerable side effects.
Bottom line for me is somewhat different. My bottom line is that there are more questions open then answered, that results for mouse studies are not 1 on 1 transposable to humans and that the exact workings and long term implications of resveratrol are not studied yet. Further it's problematic to say anything about dosage in humans because it could well be a known or unknow metabolite of resveratrol doing the "good things", so stuffing yourself with high doses of resveratrol to get res plasma levels up could well be very damaging in the long run. So the "benefits"in human are just not known or studied. There is no way you can say that the benefits outweigh any transient or tolerable side effects as ling as there benefits are not founded on human studies. Besides that it's not said that a substance is safe if you don't notice any immediate side effects. I can eat lots of beta-carotene or selenium or the wrong vitamin E day in day out for years without a problem without knowing i'm increasing my risk to cancer. I could even say i feel much better taking it, but in the long it could be very bad for my health. I think the same goes for resveratrol. I can't understand people are not more cautious about this. I really don't. Probably because of the "agressive marketing"mentioned in the article/study.
So for me the bottom line is that i have to 1. be very cautious 2. I need to wait for the clinical trials to finish 3. Watch my food intake and spent $40 a month to the gym which enables me to workout 3-4 times a week to give me well studied proven benefits instead of spending $40 a month (for a lifetime when i would buy it for anti-aging purposes) for something that , and this is highly doubtful, could maybe decrease cancer risk. There are probably 100 or more other, more cheaper and well known methods or activities that accomplish the same results. Maybe resveratrol increases cancer risk in the long run, who knows. Good nutrition and regular exercising surely doesn't.
Anyways, i'm glad there are pioneers or guinea pigs out there, i have the time so i rather wait
Still some years to go. Still it seems counterintuitive to me that people who want to live longer and healthier are into gambling with their body.
In Western populations, where obesity is difficult to control, resveratrol is
commercially available as a dietary supplement with aggressive
marketing and represents a potential life-long medicine.
Today, numerous data are available on the beneficial
properties of resveratrol. However, confusion exists due to
several pieces of contradictory information,
essentially
because in vitro and animal experimental approaches are
often presented as directly transposable to humans."
First, resveratrol seems to be well tolerated. However, no
information is available on long-term administration. For
use in chronic diseases such as diabetes, colorectal cancer or
Alzheimer’s disease, or for prevention of cardiovascular
disease and anti-aging antioxidative care,
resveratrol
administration would occur over several months/years at
doses which are not yet known.
Edited by drmz, 20 December 2009 - 09:49 AM.