Keep in mind that like Huperzine A for instance, Huperzine A is simply an extract of a certain chinese herb. Huperzine A is a totally different substance compared to Ashwagandha but I'm using that for an example. Ashwagandha (I believe, not certain) has two active ingredients in quite low doses, but these two ingredients are what make up the positive nootropic effects we see in those studies. One of those active ingredients is the Withanolides, I believe this is what is causing the dendritic and axon growth but I cannot be sure. It seems that the Withanolides are at microgram doses. So while I may buy that 1 pound bag of Ashwagandha I prefer to get the most bang for my buck by buying an extract in pill form of a standardized amount of Withanolides, I do not believe taking too much would pose a health risk although I cannot be certain. Pills are preferable because a certain dose can be maintained indefinitely so that you are certain you are dosing correctly with each serving rather than ball parking it with a bag of Ashwagandha.
Just wondering, don't you think its a bit presumputious to expect the same results from the bulk herb as the methanol extract ??
I would assume an extract is more bioavailable, and also will have undergone less oxidation than the dried powdered herb.
Both good points. Bulk herbs and extracts are definitely
not the same thing. A standardized extract can make it a lot easier to get the dose you want
I take a 28:1 extract of milk thistle (with 80% silymarin), which means that 28 pounds of raw milk thistle produces 1 pound of final product. I take two 500 mg capsules and would be hard pressed to take 28 grams of milk thistle. Taking the extract, I also know exactly what dose I am getting each time. I could drink gallons of green tea to get a high level of polyphenols, but taking an extract would be a lot easier, not to mention safer. Levels of substances in plants can vary drastically. Extracts are the way to go if you want reproducable effects.
(BTW, I take a 4:1 ashwaganda extract)