Is Longevinex resveratrol really best?
#91
Posted 14 June 2007 - 05:01 AM
Which is the best QUALITY res supplement if money is not an issue?
And is it true that res is super easily oxidized?
#92
Posted 17 June 2007 - 08:14 AM
Dr. Sinclair is taking just 5mg per kg making 364 mg for 160lbs right now. I wouldn't go above that for now since he's the expert on it.
Lycopene is a supplement that is also well known to have both a cis and trans form as well. But, resveratrol has shown a big difference being trans form activates SIRT1 and cis form doesn't no huge difference has been shown with lycopene. Lycopene is well known to change forms as well based on light, heat, oxygen as well.
So, for total peace of mind you are activating SIRT1, I'd go with Longevinex which is 100mg for now. Till another competitor wises up. NSI Longevital is only 50mg still.
I sure wish someone came out with a 500mg trans resveratrol LiCap. Again, LiCaps are always legitimate regardless of supplement company since it has to be made by Pfizer personlaly the world's largest pharmaceutical.
Edited by mirian, 17 June 2007 - 06:13 PM.
sponsored ad
#93
Posted 17 June 2007 - 05:14 PM
Sirtris is testing resveratrol dosages on the order of 5 grams daily in their clinical trials. Tis is ~50-75 mg/kg per day depending on size. Clearly they think they are unlikely to get beneficial effects (or toxic ones for that matter) at lower doses.
Longevinex is the only resveratrol supplement proven to activate SIRT1 longevity gene like research-grade resveratrol. Hence, why Dr. Sinclair takes it.
Dr. Sinclair is taking just 5mg per kg making 364 mg for 160lbs right now. I wouldn't go above that for now since he's the expert on it.
#94
Posted 17 June 2007 - 05:55 PM
Longevinex has some emodin. But, Longevinex says will eventually have an emodin-free product.
Dr. Sinclair says Resveratrol is just the beginning:
http://www.economist...FTOKEN=51104714
which says:
"Resveratrol, however, is only a starting point. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, a firm based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, of which Dr Sinclair is a co-founder, has identified a number of synthetic molecules whose effect on yeast is many times more potent than resveratrol's."
Dr. Sinclair may come out with a pill with a synthetic molecule that activates Sir2/SIRT1 many times over what trans resveratrol does!
#95
Posted 18 June 2007 - 06:19 AM
"Resveratrol, however, is only a starting point. Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, a firm based in Cambridge, Massachusetts, of which Dr Sinclair is a co-founder, has identified a number of synthetic molecules whose effect on yeast is many times more potent than resveratrol's."
Dr. Sinclair may come out with a pill with a synthetic molecule that activates Sir2/SIRT1 many times over what trans resveratrol does!
#96
Posted 18 June 2007 - 06:59 AM
Why is there not a Selegiline bandwagon as low doses of that have quite positive effects on health and lifespan and at 1mg per day its cheap!!!!
#97
Posted 18 June 2007 - 07:24 AM
http://ntp.niehs.nih...Resveratrol.pdf
No page ii says that 5mg to 10mg a day of trans Resveratrol appears to be entirely safe.
You have to remember there's not much if any of human studies on resveratrol. Simply making assumptions based on studies from small mammals like mice or rates and quoting a human equavalent dose doesn't cut it for true safety. Humans are different. For example, your dog could have serious complications from consuming Xylitol causing the dogs blood sugar to plummet but for humans is safe except in excess can cause looe stools like vitamin C, magnesium, emodin, etc.
I do agree though that if it makes another mammal live longer. The odds are in favor of it applying also to humans. But, the dosage is critcal. We have yet to find this out. But, I think in the next two years we'll have a better understanding of ideal supplement rage for resveratrol. More isn't always better. Too much selenium promotes diabetes. More than 10mg a day of vitamin B2-Riboflavin accelerates aging of the skin. More than 400IU's daily of even natural vitamin E increases mortality risk.
If I had cancer no doubt I'd be taking probably 2,000mg of trans resveratrol daily. But, because 20mg of melatonin helps with cancer. Doesn't mean someone should supplement with it long term without cancer. Dr Weil indicates that long term supplementation of melatonin reduces the amount your body produces. Should only be used for jet lag for no more than 3 days or perhaps if you have cancer.
Edited by mirian, 18 June 2007 - 08:39 PM.
#98
Posted 18 June 2007 - 02:15 PM
- it's 10mg/kg/day
#99
Posted 18 June 2007 - 02:52 PM
If you want a low dose regimen. NOW Pomeratrol has 20mg of trans resveratrol per Vcap with some pomegranate. Which I agree with more than their newer 50mg resveratrol formula with green tea, anyways. 10mg is actually the upper safe amount proven safe for humans to date: http://ntp.niehs.nih...Resveratrol.pdf
Mirian please read the following:
http://www.revgeneti...vailability.pdf
It appears low doses of resveratrol is easily tossed out of your system. Why would Dr Sinclair be testing 2.5-5 grams of a resveratrol formulation if he didnt believe a low dose may not be suitable?
Anthony
#100
Posted 18 June 2007 - 08:37 PM
#101
Posted 04 September 2007 - 08:24 AM
#102
Posted 04 September 2007 - 08:38 PM
#103
Posted 06 September 2007 - 06:24 PM
#104
Posted 06 September 2007 - 07:04 PM
Anyone who has taken LSD can attest to the fact that ingesting a very miniscule amount of a compound can produce profound effects.
Resveratrol has pretty significant effects when fed to mice. I could be wrong, and if so someone please correct me, but from what I’ve read there is no reason to believe that resveratrol is inherently more bioavailble in mice than humans.
Something is responsible for the “French paradox” and resveratrol is a good candidate for playing a role. I would be willing to bet if you took the resveratrol out of wine the “French paradox” would disappear. The concentration of resveratrol in wine is not that high.
As for Longevinex, as I’ve stated before on this forum I don’t like the inclusion of IP6 in the formulation, it’s not something I want to take on a daily basis, so I take RevGenetics pills instead.
George
#105
Posted 18 April 2008 - 10:56 PM
Look at the price watch list, it states who has done SIRT1 testing:
http://www.imminst.o...tch-t15059.html
A
Edited by Mind, 18 April 2008 - 11:08 PM.
#106
Posted 18 April 2008 - 11:16 PM
#107
Posted 06 December 2011 - 10:02 PM
Anyway, just wanted to hear what people had to say about this research result. Longevinex improved endothelial function. Legit result? Nothing to crow about? Already known? I doubt the brand would matter.
#108
Posted 06 December 2011 - 11:01 PM
Howard
Edited by hav, 06 December 2011 - 11:02 PM.
#109
Posted 26 July 2017 - 05:43 PM
Oh hey guys. How are you doing with Longevenix if you're on this supplement?
#110
Posted 28 July 2017 - 04:01 PM
Oh hey guys. How are you doing with Longevenix if you're on this supplement?
Same question here. Taking a look at the starting date of this thread, I think there may be some longtime users of Longevinex or RSV plain. Is one of the early posters still using Longevinex and looking a lot younger than his peers?
I ask this because Bill Sardi still claims to sell you the Fountain of Youth and says he receives emails from satisfied customers:
http://www.resveratr...1470/#more-1470
sponsored ad
#111
Posted 15 August 2017 - 06:08 PM
Giving this thread a little bump -- I'm curious if there's any concern over the EGCG in Longevinex. I also eat a ketogenic diet, which I've read can "profoundly" deplete liver stores of glutathione, somewhat mimicking acetaminophen toxicity -- https://www.ncbi.nlm...les/PMC3102314/
If I drink green tea regularly and have longevinex during my daily morning fast, am I setting myself up for potential liver toxicity issues from this EGCG stack?
64 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 64 guests, 0 anonymous users