Wow, someone's getting defensive...wonder why..
Not everything is going to be out there stated plain and clear as "dangerous" or "safe". Sometimes you have to connect the dots yourself, not everything is going to be done for you! You have to look up the effects of a substance and decide for yourself if what it does is harmful. No study on earth is going to say, due to down regulation of so and so neurotransmitter, this substance is harmful.... SCIENCE DOES NOT WORK LIKE THAT.
First the bolded part, thank you for such an enlightening statement, except wait...hold on...All I was saying was that your wording is NOT very scientific at all which is odd considering how much of a self-proclaimed pro you are.
Sometimes you should listen to what other people have to say... could help. But you're obviously a master at this, and youre obviously the only one who has researched anything on one of the most common drugs, so you couldn't be wrong(I wish I had an ego as big as yours bro!). Never said science worked like anything, but one way science doesn't work is when people post things as fact when they aren't fact and then it gets spread around as factual. You're acting rather silly and wow has your high horse gotten much taller...with this next paragraph:
I do not have time to argue with kids who obviously haven't taken a slightly sophisticated college course that requires them to think for themselves in their entire life. You cannot skate through life relying on other peoples opinions on whether or not something is safe, or waiting for someone to tell you what to believe. Do the research, find out the actual neuroscience yourself, and draw your OWN conclusions. Go study the purpose of cannabinoid receptors, go study how MJ cannabinoids are fat soluable and stay in the brain(good for patients with pain problems), go study the actual biochemical pathways these cannabinoids effect. Then draw your own conclusion.
I bolded the most insulting part and childish thing(simply because wow! That one part really tells a lot about your character...), but the whole paragraph is completely off topic. Here I am, having done so much research(how many goddamn times do I have to say it?) and I am thinking for myself. That IS EXACTLY what I am doing...So I'm not sure what the point of that paragraph was except to be offensive and egocentric(you obviously have enough time to argue with "kids"(lol wtf) as you have been, yet very poorly). See now here is where things get even more silly. When I realize your interpretation is wrong because believe it or not, I thought for myself all about every facet I could find on the characteristics of weed a long time ago and now instead of just accepting your source-less shit..(which you keep posting yet ofc, "you're not here to tell us what to believe")..yet when I bring it to your attention that you are wrong with your farfetched conclusion, all I get is the same thing rehashed, it being clear you didn't even consider my tips I gave a long time ago to why you are jumping to conclusions.
Anyway, like i've said forever I HAVE RESEARCHED IT... and came to vastly different conclusions just like many authors of the studies compared to your conclusion.
I'm arguing with you because you are wrong(at the very least in several important places) and you are
telling people false information as facts(where was your think for yourself mantra then?)....and WOW
more vague assertions and still you can type all this shit out and yet refuse to cite any source......because "we all have access to the internet!" As if it would be hard at all, if your statements were fact to find a couple studies that back up your
claim that getting high slowly and perpetually downregulates receptors in your brain to the point where you can make a analogy to slowly slicing bits of your brain out or flouride toxicity...or calling it "serious" and whatever else. Guess what man? I can't find a study which says anything like that or close to it! Go figure! Also, this would be common knowledge if it was near as "serious" as you claim as fact. Really though if nothing else this should be a rather big clue...for you..that your little theory youre so attached to is incomplete and mostly not factual or the facts are being interpreted wrongly by you. Also don't give me the anecdotal: "I know tons of people who smoke weed who ended up this way!" I explained three reasons why those anecdotes are not reliable in the slightest.Kevin. Downregulation for gaba is BAD for memory. Substances like L-Theanine, improve focus, by BOOSTING gaba. Gaba is what allows your brain to shut out all of the outside noise that is distracting.
that would be relative to how much GABA activity you started with naturally or via your diet/etc. At least if common sense applies, which I see no reason why it wouldn't) you have an internet connection go look up why I'm right,
I'm too lazy to sit around helping some kids who can't think for themselves :P. No wonder your vote thingy appears to be a negative 1... lmao.
Anyway can you please leave or something? Instead of posting more "facts" and 0 sources with your really lame insulting excuse. Your whole post chastises me for not doing research, while acting like I'm some idiot, yet all of those things you mentioned I have indepth knowledge on and much more, which I stated in my like 1st post and every one after.. I'm actually starting to think maybe weed does cause brain damage to some people in particular..*cough*
Oh yeah, lol, You have a splendid day as well kind sir!