• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Datasets to analyze?


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 InquilineKea

  • Guest
  • 778 posts
  • 89
  • Location:Redmond,WA (aka Simfish)

Posted 09 May 2011 - 04:39 AM


Does anyone have any datasets (of topics potentially relevant to this site) that we can analyze?

#2 erzebet

  • Guest
  • 195 posts
  • 145
  • Location:Bucharest

Posted 28 April 2012 - 08:23 PM

here is a source of recorded electrophysiological signals:

http://physionet.org/

if you are interested in brain-computer interfaces you could start by using these datasets recorded on humans.

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#3 treonsverdery

  • Guest
  • 1,312 posts
  • 161
  • Location:where I am at

Posted 09 May 2012 - 12:47 AM

I think that big cities as well as the Mormons have the data to see if this chronoheritability effect is also true at the united states. Norwegians are documented as varying their heritability. N=47,000 people per year yet heritability of physiology gradually changes from .23 to .87
Thats the difference between "nah <---> biology is destiny" also if people were able to find out what part of the current cycle is happening those with awesome genetics could have kids during the .87 high genetic heritability periods, those who would like their kids to dodge something like highly heritable cardiovascular disease could conceive during the .23 correlation times.

From the perspective of an immortalist the question, do lab mice follow these same yearly curves or oscillate 30 times faster as a result of their size. It would provide a major suggestion as to the source of gradually shifting heritability.

Attached File  heritability guide.PNG   566.57KB   0 downloads




2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users