Ok, so I've got some pretty good skills in the the fields of illustration and graphic design and I've been thinking of different ways to make contributions for the Imminst.
I have pretty mixed feelings about contributing though. The possibilities are endless and I think reaching the mainstream is very feasible, but there are also huge challenges along the way. Let me explain.
Most of us Imminst members have a good idea about what this site is about. I believe I do too (though I remain agnostic), but when I came here I had very little knowledge about this place and the reason for my first visits had to do with the information provided in one specific subforum of Imminst. Now that I have gained some knowledge of different areas of research, all of the information about "Imminsting" is starting to form a very beautiful, organized, and yet interconnected web that makes me see the world from a totally different perspective.
I think the complex nature of Imminst doesn't bend to the simple slogans like "let's end aging" or phrases like "anti-aging" that are used. To be honest, if I had heard someone advertise a site or project or institute using those terms when I had no knowledge about this site, I wouldn't have been interested. The reason is not that the content of the messages in themselves are bad but rather that the culture around us has modified our thinking so that those terms evokes mental connections and images that don't do this project justice. Anti-aging equals L'Oreal's cosmetics in my head at least. "Ending aging" sounds like a cheap Eastern European scam intended to rob people of their money. "Battle against aging" sounds like the title of a poor hard sci-fi story.
I would really like to hear your opinions on this matter, whether you agree with me or not.
I have thought about some tentative ways to approach this problem that I think is very real. Here's what I've got:
-trying to modify the culture around us so that the terms and slogans start evoking better thoughts (very hard, poor resource use and payoff ratio)
-replacing the phrases and slogans with either:
--careful combinations of existing words
or
--newly created words (both of these have the potential of misuse though)
-de-emphasizing words and instead putting emphasis on photographs, images, graphs from scientific studies, models etc. etc.
I think the possibilities are the biggest with the last solution, though a combination of several solutions of the ones I've mentioned and of the ones you come up with is a better idea.
Anyways, does this make sense or do you think I'm just making up a problem where there isn't one?