Im sorry but if you have an addictive personality i would advise you to refrain from using any nootropics, because those who actually work and make you feel enlightened in any sense will get you hooked. And once you stop you will develop psychological withdrawal
It would be a large understatement to say that the term 'nootropics' is loosely defined, and so it certainly cannot be said that anything anyone considers a 'nootropic' should be avoided if you have an 'addictive personality' (another pseudo-clinical term with a very loose definition). I would be okay with the term 'nootropic' being thrown out, along with 'addictive personality', as they are both terms that are sourced from bro-science in my opinion.
What is a
nootropic? An AMPA modulator? Something that improves LTP? Something that corrects an imbalance, temporary or permanent? Something that acts as a prophylactic against a large amount of predictable future neurophysical or emotional stress? A stimulant? Something that causes neurogenisis? Something that subjectively just makes you think better, or remember better without a clear explanation as to how it is accomplished? Something that specifically counteracts an addiction that was creating a loss in cognitive ability?
A nootropic will be something different for everyone, especially those with a specific pathology, like many/most on this board have, addiction included. Many substances here, that subectively/objectively act as nootropics for an individual, do so specifically by lessening addiction to, sub-optimal self medication with, or damage caused by other substances.
You'd think people on these forums had more sense but no, "nicotine is 3 times more toxic than potassium cyanide" LOL
It's not fair to lump "everyone" in to your admonishment in regard to a comment made by one person. Many people here are exceptionally reasonable, educated, and careful, even more so than most MDs (careful). I don't know of too many MDs, and I know more than a few personally, who take the time to read the full research regarding everything that they prescribe, especially in the context of other regulated or non-regulated options out there. Of course, there are exceptions and a select few fringe individuals on this board tend toward the reckless, choose to chase a
nootropic buzz, or choose the shotgun approach without being aware of the science or the consequences. After all, the board itself is not password protected and is free to all to read who can use google. However, especially when the recklessness of modern commonly prescribed medications is taken into account, an example being long term adderall use amongst many others, then the approach by most here, who are attempting to find more sustainable and less long-term damaging solutions through a largely careful and responsible methodology, should escape your finger pointing.
The amount of random shit, with zero scientific research behind them, that people consume on these forums would make nicotine seem like a kid experimenting with chocolate
Addressed above, but also patently untrue (especially with the lazy accusation of "zero research being behind them"): the term 'random shit' being wholly non-specific. Again, "people" on these forums covers a lot of "people", most of whom don't deserve your rush to judgment or other wise blind categorization based on relative unfamiliarity with specific personalities here and your skimming the forum.
Persoanlly, I'd be a heck of a lot more sick/damaged/less functional than I am if it weren't for this forum. I'm able to live my life becasue of it.
Edited by golgi1, 10 October 2012 - 06:32 PM.