• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
* * * * * 27 votes

Chemically induced LTP?

ciltep pde4 forskolin ltp

  • Please log in to reply
2626 replies to this topic

#1441 blueinfinity

  • Guest
  • 122 posts
  • 33
  • Location:UNITED STATES

Posted 19 April 2013 - 05:18 AM

Yeah 5 grams sound like a lot but there is a lack of hard data to suggest Mucuna should be avoid entirely.


L-Dopa is well documented to cause permanent motor problems with continued use. There are 122 hits for l-dopa dyskinesia (in quotes) in pubmed! : (http://www.ncbi.nlm....ced dyskinesia")

Do not take Mucuna or anything else containing L-Dopa if you do not have professionally diagnosed Parkinson's disease. It was used traditionally in Aryuveda to treat Parkinsons disease and was NOT used by otherwise healthy people.

If Kanna does exhibit SSRI-like effects, you can probably expect some form of SSRI like withdrawal albeit to a lesser extent depending on the dosages and duration of use. I 'know' I read that somewhere and I'll look for my source after work ; )


In my experience, Kanna at 100mg a dose may have some negligible addiction potential. Certainly less than caffeine. Zembrin doesn't have any that I can perceive.


What happens if you took a couple pills, for a week or so, what can you do to counteract or heal from the damages?

#1442 YurtaevEngr

  • Guest
  • 2 posts
  • 0
  • Location:CA

Posted 19 April 2013 - 06:36 AM

What happens if you took a couple pills, for a week or so, what can you do to counteract or heal from the damages?

What damages? Zembrin (sceletium extract) is proven to be safe. Minor withdrawal may occur though because of its ssri effects.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#1443 KoolK3n

  • Guest
  • 253 posts
  • 32
  • Location:Normandy SR2

Posted 19 April 2013 - 11:46 AM

Yeah 5 grams sound like a lot but there is a lack of hard data to suggest Mucuna should be avoid entirely.


L-Dopa is well documented to cause permanent motor problems with continued use. There are 122 hits for l-dopa dyskinesia (in quotes) in pubmed! : (http://www.ncbi.nlm....ced dyskinesia")

Do not take Mucuna or anything else containing L-Dopa if you do not have professionally diagnosed Parkinson's disease. It was used traditionally in Aryuveda to treat Parkinsons disease and was NOT used by otherwise healthy people.

If Kanna does exhibit SSRI-like effects, you can probably expect some form of SSRI like withdrawal albeit to a lesser extent depending on the dosages and duration of use. I 'know' I read that somewhere and I'll look for my source after work ; )


In my experience, Kanna at 100mg a dose may have some negligible addiction potential. Certainly less than caffeine. Zembrin doesn't have any that I can perceive.


What happens if you took a couple pills, for a week or so, what can you do to counteract or heal from the damages?


My thread includes a comprehensive list here laid out in layman terms:
http://www.longecity...tions-toxicity/
My god people...

Edited by KoolK3n, 19 April 2013 - 11:48 AM.

  • dislike x 1

#1444 BioFreak

  • Guest
  • 541 posts
  • 53
  • Location:Germany

Posted 19 April 2013 - 11:48 AM

I think this is a bit of a missunderstanding. mucuna seed powder, 5g, has relatively low amounts of l-dopa compared to extracts. EXTRACTS have a lot more l-dopa, many 99%. Basically taking mucuna seed extract is about the same as taking pure l-dopa, which I DO NOT RECOMMEND.

In fact I have tried tyrosine, l-dopa, and mucuna pruriens seed powder, for long periods.

Tyrosine is dangerous with chronic use, because it depletes the bodies sulfur levels. This means more then weak nails and hair, this means reduced glutathione production, which in turn lets the body age sooner, and more likely do develop any disease that depends on oxidative damage. Thats a fact. It may not be a problem with chronic low dose tyrosine supplementation, though - depending on individual sulfur status and intake.

I had this effect with tyrosine. I was able to counteract it with msm and l-cysteine and acetyl-l-cysteine in combination, but tyrosines effects are also dependent on the bodies willingness to produce tyrosine hydroxylase, meaning if your body does not want to make more l-dopa, but you need it, good luck. And increasing does not do much unless the body has a reason to increase tyrosine hydroxylase.

I tried l-dopa too, but it's effects were short lived, and in addition, it also depletes the body of sulfur. And with its toxicity, its no good long term unless really necessary.

With each I got the same sulfur depleting side effects, such as weak nails, eye floaters, increased whole body inflammation, etc, and ultimately, those substances stop working because of sulfur depletion (although as you know there are other reasons too, but they were not a problem in my case because I was able to make them working again through increasing sulfur intake)

And I have tried mucuna pruriens. Well, the need for sulfur is greatly decreased, the efficiency is steady and does not decrease over time, I have no problems at all. In fact, it does exactly what I want it to do. In comparison to l-dopa or extracts with high l-dopa content, mucuna does also replete other catecholamines, works as an neuroprotectant, and is more effective then pure l-dopa, and even works longer in parkinson sufferers. It is being assumed that mucuna pruriens seed does either have an unknown dopamine decarboxylase inhibitor, or that in fact other substances are responsible for its effects. I tend towards the second hypothesis. The reason is that only then the positive effects, that l-dopa + dopa decarboxylase inhibitor do not have, can be explained.

To me it makes sense - the plant does produce a lot of l-dopa, so it must have means to deal with l-dopa so it does not become toxic.


taking 5g l-dopa is insane for a more or less healthy person. 5g mucuna pruriens, is not.

Again, this is from personal, long term experience (years with high dose tyrosine, months with tyrosine + l-dopa, and more then half a year with mucuna, tyrosine combined, and now mucuna alone). I have experienced no side effects, in fact I have only seen improvements and no decrease in effectiveness. Only with uridine I had to increase mucuna seed powder dosage, but uridine messes with the dopamine system itself(and that was only to make uridine work for me.). I can easily stop taking this stuff, and I simply return to baseline. I have no symptoms that are associated with chronic l-dopa use.

Suit yourself guys, I know whats working for me. U guys wanna check out the page on examine.com for mucuna pruriens though.

Then again, I might be a special case, because I had chronic depression for 20+ years, and the classic serotonin increasing treatment did not work long term but in fact seemed to damage my brain, while increasing dopamine did the trick to get my "old me", meaning my pre-depression me, back.

For me, this is the savest alternative. Think ritalin(and possibly other dopamine agonists, think killing dopaminergic neurons. That's a no-go, too.

EDIT: Did I mention mucuna seed powder does increase serotonin too, while pure l-dopa reduces it?

Edited by BioFreak, 19 April 2013 - 11:52 AM.

  • like x 2

#1445 xsiv1

  • Guest
  • 463 posts
  • 39
  • Location:Canada

Posted 19 April 2013 - 03:15 PM

Tyrosine is dangerous with chronic use, because it depletes the bodies sulfur levels. This means more then weak nails and hair, this means reduced glutathione production, which in turn lets the body age sooner, and more likely do develop any disease that depends on oxidative damage. Thats a fact. It may not be a problem with chronic low dose tyrosine supplementation, though - depending on individual sulfur status and intake.

.
How did they test you for a depletion of sulphur? Were you getting blood assays done? Serum level tests? Or are you basing it off the aforementioned symptoms? Also, why combine l-cysteine with NAC? I take NAC daily but it was my understanding that with l-cysteine, you'd need to dose 3X as much Vitamin C due to it's metabolites and subsequent elevation of adverse effects.

#1446 BioFreak

  • Guest
  • 541 posts
  • 53
  • Location:Germany

Posted 19 April 2013 - 04:01 PM

Tyrosine is dangerous with chronic use, because it depletes the bodies sulfur levels. This means more then weak nails and hair, this means reduced glutathione production, which in turn lets the body age sooner, and more likely do develop any disease that depends on oxidative damage. Thats a fact. It may not be a problem with chronic low dose tyrosine supplementation, though - depending on individual sulfur status and intake.

.
How did they test you for a depletion of sulphur? Were you getting blood assays done? Serum level tests? Or are you basing it off the aforementioned symptoms? Also, why combine l-cysteine with NAC? I take NAC daily but it was my understanding that with l-cysteine, you'd need to dose 3X as much Vitamin C due to it's metabolites and subsequent elevation of adverse effects.


No I did not test for it. However, after supplementing with high dose tyrosine i got symptoms such as extremely weak nails, increased inflammation, eye floaters, etc. - taking cysteine reversed the whole thing.
Not only that, tyrosine started working again.
By the way, I did this several times, and the symptoms returned each time. They just perfectly fit the theory (from neuroassist - http://www.neuroassist.com/).
I got this information from neuroassist, when they still had their guide for practitioners online (they were/are doing amino acid therapy). And everything they wrote checked out for me (such as no 5-htp without tyrosine, no tyrosine without cysteine, no cysteine without cofactors...). Of course I had to go my own way, suffering the consequences, and each time I then adjusted my supplementation to their guideline, things improved. I think they have a few studies published too. They sell the supplements that I built on my own, based on theirs.
NAC was more of my own invention - it seems not to contribute directly to the sulfur cycle, but boosts glutathione directly (cysteine can be converted to homocysteine, which in turn with b6,b12 and folate is used to power the sulfur cylce, for example in the production of SAMe which is needed for the conversion of noradrenaline into adrenaline - thats why cofactors are very important otherwise an increase in homocysteine is not a good thing). And since I was having severe problems, I was making sure I get enough glutathione.
L-cysteine is especially problematic because it pushes and connects to heavy metals from the cells into the bloodstream, making the new formed substance able to cross the bbb. So in theory, this could lead to heavy metal toxification of the brain, unless those molecules get flushed out. Thats why selenium is in their formula, too...

So why go through all that trouble if mucuna pruriens seed powder does it better? You don't necessarily have to go high dose, just high enough to get the effect you're looking for.
examine.com has a good researched page on mucuna pruriens (and one on l-dopa) which says what I was saying...

But as I was saying, low dose tyrosine supplementation might be ok for most people.
Most of this is stuff I learned from the neuroassist people, and it checked out every time I tested it on my body. Speaking about placebo, at the beginning I just had the symptoms and then looked for answers, so I was not prepared to have the symptoms "cause they told me so".

#1447 Metagene

  • Guest
  • 674 posts
  • 78
  • Location:Florida
  • NO

Posted 19 April 2013 - 06:13 PM

Yeah 5 grams sound like a lot but there is a lack of hard data to suggest Mucuna should be avoid entirely.


I feel like Kenny Killjoy today, but that isn't my experience with it. I was being vague before, but I'm talking about scary muscle symptoms that haven't yet entirely abated and exactly what one would expect to see from L-Dopa toxicity. You'd be shocked to know how little I was using, especially in relation to 5 gram doses.

I especially disagree with the following rationalization:

Preparation, potency, and duration of use
are very important.


As a generalization, not true. There are thousands of substances that aren't recommended at any potency, duration of use, or preparation.

It has been used for centuries much like Kava Kava for example. That was banned out right in some countries over unsubstantiated hepatotoxicity fears.


This is the type of absolute BS (no offense) to which I was before referring, and is an example of what sometimes causes otherwise cautious individuals to discard legitimate and warranted warnings. You can't make an argument for a substance by associating it with another. That's a rhetorical fallacy. An illogical semantic trick. Mucuna is not Kava is not Mucuna. Also, claimed length of use, I assume tribal, is completely irrelevant not to mention lacking all context. There are studies that link tribal use of all sorts of substances to a myriad of disordered/disease states.

However, do as you will. My motivation for posting was out of a felt responsibility to the board to relate my experience with it, not to shout anyone down.


I'm fully aware of that fact and my statement never implied such. The kava comparison is applicable. Both substance have been used for various reasons over thousands of years. That doesn't mean they're 100% safety. Further investigation is required and as you stated above context matters. Still Logical assumption can be made i.e Kava consumption and liver damage should be strongly correlated across the pacific. Do data suggest this? Why not?

Yeah 5 grams sound like a lot but there is a lack of hard data to suggest Mucuna should be avoid entirely.


L-Dopa is well documented to cause permanent motor problems with continued use. There are 122 hits for l-dopa dyskinesia (in quotes) in pubmed! : (http://www.ncbi.nlm....ced dyskinesia")

Do not take Mucuna or anything else containing L-Dopa if you do not have professionally diagnosed Parkinson's disease. It was used traditionally in Aryuveda to treat Parkinsons disease and was NOT used by otherwise healthy people.

If Kanna does exhibit SSRI-like effects, you can probably expect some form of SSRI like withdrawal albeit to a lesser extent depending on the dosages and duration of use. I 'know' I read that somewhere and I'll look for my source after work ; )


In my experience, Kanna at 100mg a dose may have some negligible addiction potential. Certainly less than caffeine. Zembrin doesn't have any that I can perceive.


According to whom?

Mucuna
Prurita is an annual twiner, whose approximately
all parts are of medicinal value. In India it is
found in Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh,
Assam, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh,
Jammu-Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya
Pradesh, Maharashtra, Nagaland, Orissa,
Punjab, Rajasthan, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttar
Pradesh, and West Bengal. Mucuna Prurita is
also known as Cowhage, Kapikachhu,
Atmagupta, Kaunch and Kevanch. The seeds are
aphrodisiac, spermatogenetic, retentive,
prescribed in impotency, spermatorrhoea and
sexual debility, laxative, alexipharmic and useful
in gonorrhea. The seed is a prophylactic against
oligospermia, useful in increasing sperm count,
ovulation in women, etc. It prevents male and
female sterility and acts as a nervine tonic. Roots
acts as an emmenagogue, its smoke accelerates
delivery & lessen the pain, a strong infusion of
the roots mixed with honey is used in cholera, as
a remedy for delirium in fever, also roots powder
is made into paste and is applied to body in
dropsy. Leaves are aphrodisiac, tonic,
anthelmintic, it lessens inflammation and
improves blood flow, it treats ulcer, its juice given
in headache. Hairs of Mucuna pods acts as
vermifuge to expel ascarids, it is used as a local
stimulant and mild vesident.2-4 A decoction of the
roots is used as a diuretic and cleanser of the
kidneys, and is made into an ointment for
elephantiasis. Mucuna is also used in asthma,
bite (dog), bite (snake), cancer, cough, diarrhea,
fracture, madness, and mumps.


http://www.ijpbs.net/issue-3/58.pdf

A good example of misuse.

During the 18th and 19th centuries, Mucuna was grown
widely as a green vegetable in the foothills and lower hills of the eastern Himalayas and in Mauritius
(Watt 1883; Piper and Tracy 1910; CSIR 1962). Both the green pods and the mature beans were boiled
and eaten. Burkill (1966) and Watt (1883) suggested that Mucuna was eventually replaced as a
vegetable in Asia by more palatable legumes, although it is still used as a famine food and as specialty
food in northeastern India (CSIR 1962). In Guatemala and Mexico, M. pruriens has for at least several
decades been roasted and ground to make a coffee substitute; the seed is widely known in the region
as "Nescafé," in recognition of this use. The use of Mucuna spp. as minor food crops has also been
reported in Ghana (Osei-Bonsu et al. 1995), Mozambique (Infante et al. 1990), and Nigeria (Ezueh
1977). However, an outbreak of acute psychosis in Mozambique was attributed to the inappropriate
consumption of velvetbean: because of famine and drought, the water used to boil the seed was not
discarded, as it normally is, and larger than normal quantities of this liquid were consumed (Infante
et al. 1990).


http://www.essex.ac....heMagicBean.pdf

Thanks for the clarification Biofreak. I have used the Now and himalaya brands of mucuna without ill effects. 6% L-DOPA. Mucuna is said to contain trace amounts of 5-HT and 5-HTP. I don't think that's doing much for your serotonin levels.

Edited by Metagene, 19 April 2013 - 06:38 PM.


#1448 Galaxyshock

  • Guest
  • 1,534 posts
  • 184
  • Location:Finland

Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:04 PM

I haven't had any issues with Mucuna whole herb powder. I've used it extensively last months, no real side effects, withdrawals or even tolerance issues (couple teaspoons a day). Also using extract with EGCG has been fine too but it's probably not as safe route long-term. Mucuna gives me increased drive (especially sex drive gets strong), confidence, strength and muscle mass. I've taken some breaks and haven't had any dopamine-depletion issues or anything. Only side effects have been oily skin and some pimples (probably due to its testosterone-increase) and perhaps some restlessness when combined with somewhat high caffeine amounts. I have to say though that three years ago when I used Mucuna extracts a lot I did get issues like feverish feeling and anxiety. So I think it's an herb that should be treated with respect. As a "brain tonic" and bodybuilding-aid it's excellent. Magnesium, Schisandra and other neuroprotective things may be good augment.

#1449 Mr. Pink

  • Guest
  • 226 posts
  • 28
  • Location:USA

Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:16 PM

I haven't had any issues with Mucuna whole herb powder. I've used it extensively last months, no real side effects, withdrawals or even tolerance issues (couple teaspoons a day). Also using extract with EGCG has been fine too but it's probably not as safe route long-term. Mucuna gives me increased drive (especially sex drive gets strong), confidence, strength and muscle mass. I've taken some breaks and haven't had any dopamine-depletion issues or anything. Only side effects have been oily skin and some pimples (probably due to its testosterone-increase) and perhaps some restlessness when combined with somewhat high caffeine amounts. I have to say though that three years ago when I used Mucuna extracts a lot I did get issues like feverish feeling and anxiety. So I think it's an herb that should be treated with respect. As a "brain tonic" and bodybuilding-aid it's excellent. Magnesium, Schisandra and other neuroprotective things may be good augment.


why is EGCG less safe?

#1450 Galaxyshock

  • Guest
  • 1,534 posts
  • 184
  • Location:Finland

Posted 19 April 2013 - 07:28 PM

I haven't had any issues with Mucuna whole herb powder. I've used it extensively last months, no real side effects, withdrawals or even tolerance issues (couple teaspoons a day). Also using extract with EGCG has been fine too but it's probably not as safe route long-term. Mucuna gives me increased drive (especially sex drive gets strong), confidence, strength and muscle mass. I've taken some breaks and haven't had any dopamine-depletion issues or anything. Only side effects have been oily skin and some pimples (probably due to its testosterone-increase) and perhaps some restlessness when combined with somewhat high caffeine amounts. I have to say though that three years ago when I used Mucuna extracts a lot I did get issues like feverish feeling and anxiety. So I think it's an herb that should be treated with respect. As a "brain tonic" and bodybuilding-aid it's excellent. Magnesium, Schisandra and other neuroprotective things may be good augment.


why is EGCG less safe?


That's just suspicion
http://www.longecity...-for-alzheimer/

It may be that constituents in Mucuna modulate the activity of L-DOPA different than DDCIs (Cardidopa, EGCG) and the other compounds in it have different neuroprotective and -modulating effects.

Unlike synthetic levodopa treatment, Mucuna pruriens cotyledon powder treatment significantly restored the endogenous levodopa, dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin content in the substantia nigra.


http://onlinelibrary...r.1514/abstract

Pure Mucuna really shouldn't be treated as L-DOPA.. but we might want to further research its pharmacology and uses.

#1451 Ames

  • Guest
  • 361 posts
  • 75
  • Location:Cloud 7

Posted 19 April 2013 - 09:32 PM

The kava comparison is applicable. Both substance have been used for various reasons over thousands of years. That doesn't mean they're 100% safety. Further investigation is required and as you stated above context matters. Still Logical assumption can be made i.e Kava consumption and liver damage should be strongly correlated across the pacific. Do data suggest this? Why not?


Well, i guess we disagree, then, on what is logical (applicable) in argument. Your making a case for legitimacy-by-association, using a parallel measure of time-in-use as the basis. I disagree with that as being a legitimate (ie: rational) form of argument.

You state "That doesn't mean that they're 100% safety". I'll take your choice of "percent safe" association, and expand it to it's logical end to disrupt the 'high percentage safe' rhetorical trick that was thrown in to that statement (whether you realize it or not): that doesn't mean that it's 75%, 50%, 25%, 10% or 5% safe either. Of course, I'm not sure what % safe means, exactly, (because it's meaningless) and so I'm just debating semantics.

It would be difficult to do "further investigation" on Mucuna dosing in healthy individuals, because the study would almost definitely be unethical due to the preceding negative research outcomes of the active ingredient in Mucuna: L-Dopa. Therefore, in the absence of Mucuna research in healthy humans, it's both practical and rational to defer to the negative outcomes of L-Dopa research when evaluating Mucuna for personal consumption.

I insinuated that context matters in terms of off-the-wall marketing hype that takes bits and pieces of decontextualized information, such as time-in-use by tribal peoples, and extrapolates it to make generalizations about a substances safety.

I could care less about Kava. That isn't the discussion here, and it has no bearing on whether or not Mucuna is safe. No matter how much it is spun. A few months ago, I think that I read something about Kava's liver toxic effects being mitigated by a specific preparation, but I'm not sure. Other things that I have read about Kava, years ago, caused me to decide against trying it. It's undoubtedly recreational and anxiolytic, but recreation isn't my personal focus.

Pure Mucuna really shouldn't be treated as L-DOPA.. but we might want to further research its pharmacology and uses.


Well, the problem is that, often, and even especially when substances are researched with good outcomes, guys and gals go out and get the enhanced or concentrated form that was not studied. You can notice that impulse in the statements of what posters were/are using, just before your above quoted post (and this is without good studies). The thinking goes something like this: "Well, if Mucuna is good, then 6%/10%/20% L-Dopa Mucuna must be better!". And so it goes. Except, in the case of Mucuna, that type of thinking leads to higher concentrations of a neurotoxic substance. Once more, that fallacious illogical impulse likely won't disappear anytime soon. My personal thinking on the subject of L-Dopa isn't dose dependent. Although there are certain medical uses for a small amount of toxin, I don't believe that there is any logical reason to assume that this is one of them. Certainly, the risk isn't one that people should take in the case of this substance. The penalty for being wrong is just too high, in my opinion.

Edited by golgi1, 19 April 2013 - 09:46 PM.


#1452 BioFreak

  • Guest
  • 541 posts
  • 53
  • Location:Germany

Posted 20 April 2013 - 12:34 PM

L-Dopa is well documented to cause permanent motor problems with continued use. There are 122 hits for l-dopa dyskinesia (in quotes) in pubmed! : (http://www.ncbi.nlm....ced dyskinesia")

Do not take Mucuna or anything else containing L-Dopa if you do not have professionally diagnosed Parkinson's disease. It was used traditionally in Aryuveda to treat Parkinsons disease and was NOT used by otherwise healthy people.


Mucuna is being used for a variety of health problems in aryuveda. I think everyone here agrees that pure l-dopa is toxic at higher dosages. If you have studies showing the same for mucuna pruriens seed powder, where l-dopa content has not been artifically increased, I would like to see them. However, there are studies showing neuroprotective and neurorestaurative activity of mucuna seed powder, contrary to concentrated l-dopa preperations. In addition, there is a theory that a lack of serotonin is the actual cause of dyskinesia (dopamine surpresses serotonin and vice versa). If that was the case, it could not happen with mucuna pruriens seed powder, because it was shown to increase serotonin as well. Keep in mind that a patient treated with very high amounts of l-dopa will have severely depleted serotonin levels and it might take a long time until the normal levels return, and most patients will not be able to stop l-dopa therapy this long since the parkinson symptoms come back.


A good example of misuse.


Which is to be expected for any substance that has significant effects on the dopaminergic system (such as adhd meds, drugs...).
I never got a drug like trip feeling on mucuna though, it just makes my brain work more normal.

During the 18th and 19th centuries, Mucuna was grown
widely as a green vegetable in the foothills and lower hills of the eastern Himalayas and in Mauritius
(Watt 1883; Piper and Tracy 1910; CSIR 1962). Both the green pods and the mature beans were boiled
and eaten. Burkill (1966) and Watt (1883) suggested that Mucuna was eventually replaced as a
vegetable in Asia by more palatable legumes, although it is still used as a famine food and as specialty
food in northeastern India (CSIR 1962). In Guatemala and Mexico, M. pruriens has for at least several
decades been roasted and ground to make a coffee substitute; the seed is widely known in the region
as "Nescafé," in recognition of this use. The use of Mucuna spp. as minor food crops has also been
reported in Ghana (Osei-Bonsu et al. 1995), Mozambique (Infante et al. 1990), and Nigeria (Ezueh
1977). However, an outbreak of acute psychosis in Mozambique was attributed to the inappropriate
consumption of velvetbean: because of famine and drought, the water used to boil the seed was not
discarded, as it normally is, and larger than normal quantities of this liquid were consumed (Infante
et al. 1990).


Strong dopaminergic activity always has the risk for psychosis. That goes for mucuna, l-dopa, dopamine agonists etc. Especially contraindicated for people with psychosis! Those people must have gotten a LOT l-dopa though. I mean, far away from dosages we are talking about if it affected a whole group of people that strongly (or they all were almost psychotic anyways, maybe through similar genetic mutations, who knows).

I haven't had any issues with Mucuna whole herb powder. I've used it extensively last months, no real side effects, withdrawals or even tolerance issues (couple teaspoons a day). Also using extract with EGCG has been fine too but it's probably not as safe route long-term. Mucuna gives me increased drive (especially sex drive gets strong), confidence, strength and muscle mass. I've taken some breaks and haven't had any dopamine-depletion issues or anything. Only side effects have been oily skin and some pimples (probably due to its testosterone-increase) and perhaps some restlessness when combined with somewhat high caffeine amounts. I have to say though that three years ago when I used Mucuna extracts a lot I did get issues like feverish feeling and anxiety. So I think it's an herb that should be treated with respect. As a "brain tonic" and bodybuilding-aid it's excellent. Magnesium, Schisandra and other neuroprotective things may be good augment.


Exactly. I have had no withdrawal issues too. Thats why the researchers call it neurorestaurative. In general everything that effectively changes neurotransmitter levels should be treated with respect.

Sidenote about EGCG: I've been experimenting with it a while ago. Concretely, I have been drinking strong tea made of a special kind of green tea that had the highest amount of EGCG. This was back in the day when I was just starting to experiment with the dopaminergic system. In my case, the tea (and I suspect the EGCG content to be the cause) blocked dopamine not only in the body, but in the brain too. I was going out celebrating someones birthday, but I had no positive effect from alcohol (the usual happy feeling). What I had, however, was a major blackout, and I normally do not have something like that. Also, my girlfriend told me that I was a completely different person (in a very negative sense) - while normally people perceive me as nice when I am drinking.
I concluded from this that EGCG's effects are happening in body AND brain. This fits to other effects of egcg has on the brain - how could it if it does not pass the bbb? So this would mean that its senseless to combine a dopamine producing substance with egcg.
Its pretty pointless to use a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor if it works in the brain, too. That is, if you intend to increase the dopaminergic system.

I have never used the egcg rich tea again, and this situation also never came back. I have no interest in reproduction for science though. ;)

Well, the problem is that, often, and even especially when substances are researched with good outcomes, guys and gals go out and get the enhanced or concentrated form that was not studied. You can notice that impulse in the statements of what posters were/are using, just before your above quoted post (and this is without good studies). The thinking goes something like this: "Well, if Mucuna is good, then 6%/10%/20% L-Dopa Mucuna must be better!". And so it goes. Except, in the case of Mucuna, that type of thinking leads to higher concentrations of a neurotoxic substance. Once more, that fallacious illogical impulse likely won't disappear anytime soon. My personal thinking on the subject of L-Dopa isn't dose dependent. Although there are certain medical uses for a small amount of toxin, I don't believe that there is any logical reason to assume that this is one of them. Certainly, the risk isn't one that people should take in the case of this substance. The penalty for being wrong is just too high, in my opinion.


Thats indeed one of the biggest problems here. It was very confusing for me at first too, sources speaking about l-dopa toxicity, others about neuroprotective effects, until I figured out that the difference was between the isolated compound, or extracts, and the whole bean powder. This is why I always point out that I mean the seed powder, and NOT any extract. And the generalization of more concentrated = more potent, is, like any generalization not always true, and this case must be communicated as often as possible so that it becomes common knowledge.

Do not forget that the body produces l-dopa too, and this is for a reason. Therefore to call it a toxin is wrong. It becomes a toxin due to higher dosages then normally used in the body(Remember, l-dopa is used for parkinson, and there we are speaking about MASSIVE doses of l-dopa daily), through direct effects as well as indirect effects through putting pressure on the catecholamine metabolism. Also it surpresses serotonin at higher dosages. Then l-dopa is always used with a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, this means that ALL of it is being used in the brain exclusively. Mucuna pruriens seems to taggle those problems, making it a lot safer. My hypothesis is that this plant has do deal with its l-dopa content, and the way this plant does it, is the same way it helps the human body deal with l-dopa.
So in a way, it would be VERY interesting to conduct a study on mucuna seed powder that has NO l-dopa in it, and see if the neuroprotective and neurorestaurative effects are still there. That would be very interesting.

Researchers also speculate that mucuna pruriens has some form of unknown dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, making it effective. But from my personal experience I can tell you that this must be wrong. I suffered from restless leg syndrome for years, and both tyrosine, and now mucuna pruriens solved this problem for me. Dopamine is not only needed in the brain, but in nerves throughout the body too, so when you use a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor there will be no dopamine in the body - only in the brain. This means that RLS gets even worse. But it does not. Therefore, I speculate that there is no inhibitor in the plant.

#1453 Ames

  • Guest
  • 361 posts
  • 75
  • Location:Cloud 7

Posted 21 April 2013 - 02:09 PM

Well, the problem is that, often, and even especially when substances are researched with good outcomes, guys and gals go out and get the enhanced or concentrated form that was not studied. You can notice that impulse in the statements of what posters were/are using, just before your above quoted post (and this is without good studies). The thinking goes something like this: "Well, if Mucuna is good, then 6%/10%/20% L-Dopa Mucuna must be better!". And so it goes. Except, in the case of Mucuna, that type of thinking leads to higher concentrations of a neurotoxic substance. Once more, that fallacious illogical impulse likely won't disappear anytime soon. My personal thinking on the subject of L-Dopa isn't dose dependent. Although there are certain medical uses for a small amount of toxin, I don't believe that there is any logical reason to assume that this is one of them. Certainly, the risk isn't one that people should take in the case of this substance. The penalty for being wrong is just too high, in my opinion.


Thats indeed one of the biggest problems here. It was very confusing for me at first too, sources speaking about l-dopa toxicity, others about neuroprotective effects, until I figured out that the difference was between the isolated compound, or extracts, and the whole bean powder. This is why I always point out that I mean the seed powder, and NOT any extract. And the generalization of more concentrated = more potent, is, like any generalization not always true, and this case must be communicated as often as possible so that it becomes common knowledge.

Do not forget that the body produces l-dopa too, and this is for a reason. Therefore to call it a toxin is wrong. It becomes a toxin due to higher dosages then normally used in the body(Remember, l-dopa is used for parkinson, and there we are speaking about MASSIVE doses of l-dopa daily), through direct effects as well as indirect effects through putting pressure on the catecholamine metabolism. Also it surpresses serotonin at higher dosages. Then l-dopa is always used with a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, this means that ALL of it is being used in the brain exclusively. Mucuna pruriens seems to taggle those problems, making it a lot safer. My hypothesis is that this plant has do deal with its l-dopa content, and the way this plant does it, is the same way it helps the human body deal with l-dopa.
So in a way, it would be VERY interesting to conduct a study on mucuna seed powder that has NO l-dopa in it, and see if the neuroprotective and neurorestaurative effects are still there. That would be very interesting.


In light of the spin that is being put on my comment, that is counter my general conclusion here, I have to reiterate that I wholly disagree with your conclusion that unmodified Mucuna powder is a generally safe and wise substance to consume. I especially disagree with the rationalization process (becasue I view it as being irrational) that I above highlighted, and it's resultant conclusion about at what non-specific level ("higher dosage than normally used(?) in the body") L-Dopa has a long term net toxic effect on the nervous system. I highlighted the word 'hypothesis', because I don't believe that a hypothesis is enough to contribute to assumptions of safety.

I will assume that I'm now clear enough for anyone following the thread and group reasoning here, and will bow out and let you guys discuss Mucuna without further admonishment/input from me - as long as my posts aren't again used to reach conclusions that are counter to my intended context.

Edited by golgi1, 21 April 2013 - 02:23 PM.

  • dislike x 1
  • like x 1

#1454 BioFreak

  • Guest
  • 541 posts
  • 53
  • Location:Germany

Posted 21 April 2013 - 08:21 PM

Do not forget that the body produces l-dopa too, and this is for a reason. Therefore to call it a toxin is wrong. It becomes a toxin due to higher dosages then normally used in the body(Remember, l-dopa is used for parkinson, and there we are speaking about MASSIVE doses of l-dopa daily), through direct effects as well as indirect effects through putting pressure on the catecholamine metabolism. Also it surpresses serotonin at higher dosages. Then l-dopa is always used with a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor, this means that ALL of it is being used in the brain exclusively. Mucuna pruriens seems to taggle those problems, making it a lot safer. My hypothesis is that this plant has do deal with its l-dopa content, and the way this plant does it, is the same way it helps the human body deal with l-dopa.
So in a way, it would be VERY interesting to conduct a study on mucuna seed powder that has NO l-dopa in it, and see if the neuroprotective and neurorestaurative effects are still there. That would be very interesting.


In light of the spin that is being put on my comment, that is counter my general conclusion here, I have to reiterate that I wholly disagree with your conclusion that unmodified Mucuna powder is a generally safe and wise substance to consume. I especially disagree with the rationalization process (becasue I view it as being irrational) that I above highlighted, and it's resultant conclusion about at what non-specific level ("higher dosage than normally used(?) in the body") L-Dopa has a long term net toxic effect on the nervous system. I highlighted the word 'hypothesis', because I don't believe that a hypothesis is enough to contribute to assumptions of safety.


l-dopa gets produced in the body from tyrosine. Within the dosages that the body produces it, it is perfectly save. Otherwise we would all be intoxicated by our brains producing l-dopa... every single human on earth. The problem arises with higher then normal l-dopa levels, such as supplemented l-dopa, if the total l-dopa content in the brain is higher then intended by the body. Only then the body can not handle l-dopa and it becomes problematic. With "higher dosage then normally used in the body" I meant higher dosage then the l-dopa content a healthy body produces by itself. I hope this is more clear now.

However, this is the beauty of mucuna pruriens seed powder. Within the studies, the effects were stronger, the duration was longer and instead of suppressing serotonin it increased it alongside dopamine, and it increased noradrenaline and adrenaline, while l-dopa does none of that, or in serotonins case it does the opposite. The more I think about it, the more clear it seems that the effects from the whole bean are only to a small degree from it's l-dopa content. It can not be from an unidentified dopa decarboxylase inhibitor as well, since combining l-dopa with one does not produce these effects. But maybe it does play a part.
Think about it - the effects are very different from pure l-dopa. That makes me even more exited about it, the more I think about those differences.

Also, I added the word hypothesis, because I meant it. You better point out something is a hypothesis when someone has one and does not point it out himself. :-D But to be correct, the researchers of 2 papers about mucuna also point out that there must be other substances responsible for these effects. It's not just me. And it is not my hypothesis that makes me say that it seems to be safe, its the results of studies about mucuna pruriens seed powder (and my first hand experience). My hypothesis is primarily about why it is different from pure l-dopa or extracts and builds upon those studies.
  • like x 2

#1455 abelard lindsay

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 873 posts
  • 227
  • Location:Mare Serenitatis Circumlunar Corporate Republic

Posted 21 April 2013 - 09:18 PM

Back on topic..... :)

I've been posting a bit on the Sunifram thread (http://www.longecity...510#entry581361) about combining Sunifram with Zembrin/CILTEP. The effects are pretty astonishing. This is experimental stuff right now and I am only taking 5mg of Suni once a week bu the LTP effects are subjectively very strong.
  • like x 1

#1456 Ames

  • Guest
  • 361 posts
  • 75
  • Location:Cloud 7

Posted 22 April 2013 - 04:24 AM

Biofreak, I'm going to be merciful to this thread and refrain from detailing every logical inconsistency in your rationalization for Mucuna powder use. However, your responses continue to be rife with them. The most glaring being that you have zero method of determining exactly how much L-Dopa that needs to be replaced in your system. Nor do you have the ability to know how much you are consuming in any one dose from any one batch of powder. Even if both of these factors could be measured, your generalization of endogenous L-Dopa being "perfectly safe" (ie: no long term side effects) at any dose also has no factual merit. Your rationalizations are the exact same that is used in marketing material for Mucuna on the net. I'm familair with them. My experience is that the body and mind are far too complex to warrant making so many logical leaps of faith. If you want to do as much to rationalize your own use, then by all means go ahead. However, the logical inconsistencies for its use must be attacked on this board where so many people come and, assuredly, take much as gospel. My direct experience is also counter to your own and your conclusions.

Sorry, Abelard, I'll really bow out now. I tried this time, I did, I just wasn't successful at my attempt :-) I'm going to read up on Sunifram and probably come back here with a question or two, out of interest, and as a contribution toward getting the thread back on track.

Edited by golgi1, 22 April 2013 - 04:28 AM.


#1457 Ames

  • Guest
  • 361 posts
  • 75
  • Location:Cloud 7

Posted 22 April 2013 - 04:39 AM

lol...sorry again Abelard, I won't be much help in driving the Sunifram conversation. I hear positive allosteric modulator of AMPA receptors, and I shy away these days due to my experience with racetams. However, it looks like you are realizing some great effects from the stack. I'll look forward to reading more about it...

Edited by golgi1, 22 April 2013 - 04:42 AM.


#1458 owtsgmi

  • Guest
  • 162 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 22 April 2013 - 06:21 AM

Back on topic..... :)

I've been posting a bit on the Sunifram thread (http://www.longecity...510#entry581361) about combining Sunifram with Zembrin/CILTEP. The effects are pretty astonishing. This is experimental stuff right now and I am only taking 5mg of Suni once a week bu the LTP effects are subjectively very strong.



Did you replace the artichoke with Zembrin? Or taking both? How do you feel about the Zembrin at this point? Thanks, I am right there too!

#1459 abelard lindsay

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 873 posts
  • 227
  • Location:Mare Serenitatis Circumlunar Corporate Republic

Posted 22 April 2013 - 01:54 PM

Back on topic..... :)

I've been posting a bit on the Sunifram thread (http://www.longecity...510#entry581361) about combining Sunifram with Zembrin/CILTEP. The effects are pretty astonishing. This is experimental stuff right now and I am only taking 5mg of Suni once a week bu the LTP effects are subjectively very strong.



Did you replace the artichoke with Zembrin? Or taking both? How do you feel about the Zembrin at this point? Thanks, I am right there too!


I replaced artichoke with Zembrin. The two together were overstimulating and caused some temporary mild tinnitus which I fixed with magnesium threonate.

#1460 Judd Crane

  • Guest
  • 30 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Xanadu

Posted 22 April 2013 - 01:57 PM

I tried one DOPA Mucuna capsule (NOW) along with the Ciltep stack today but it feels too overstimulating for me.

Edited by Jontelito, 22 April 2013 - 01:57 PM.


#1461 BioFreak

  • Guest
  • 541 posts
  • 53
  • Location:Germany

Posted 22 April 2013 - 03:30 PM

I tried one DOPA Mucuna capsule (NOW) along with the Ciltep stack today but it feels too overstimulating for me.


It's an standardized extract, most likely less effective then the whole bean powder. In comparison, seed powder has between 3,1-6,1%, so 5g have between about 150-300mg of l-dopa(meaning 4700-4850mg of other stuff in the powder). Considering that I split it up in three doses, thats 50-100mg per dosage, 20-70mg less then you. And I consider myself severely deficient in dopamine (restless leg syndrome, adhd symptoms without it) so you might wanna try a much lower dose, preferably a non standardized seed powder, to get more of the good stuff... start low and work yourself up, not higher then the minimum effective dose. So I would split up the capsule in 4 portions, and try that, but I suspect that it will be much less efficient(talking about mucuna pruriens seed effects here, not l-dopa effects) since its an extract.

@golgi1

It's a pretty unfair tactic to respond and then to say you don't want this discussion to go any further (because of hijacking the thread which I respect). This means I have no way to defend myself here other then further hijacking the thread... Next time you do this, simply say you don't want to continue without further arguing in the same post.

Also, you seem to not to have looked at the studies I was talking about, and/or simply neglect them for the sake of your own argument. Not what I call logically sound.

Anyways, I will also stop going that much off topic.

Edited by BioFreak, 22 April 2013 - 04:03 PM.

  • like x 1

#1462 abelard lindsay

  • Topic Starter
  • Guest
  • 873 posts
  • 227
  • Location:Mare Serenitatis Circumlunar Corporate Republic

Posted 23 April 2013 - 04:32 AM

Tbe Sunifram interaction with CiLTEP is weird. It's three days after I took my second dose and I'm feeling a little... depressed. It's probably a high choline depression. I had to take some idebenone to get some relief. Also, I'm feeling a little warm at times. This is almost certainly the Sunifram because I was taking Zembrin for two weeks without problems. Other weird things that are happening are I am a little too fascinated with people on the street and what they are wearing. I find all the curves, colors and corners of people's outfits strangely fascinating. I find visually focusing at points far off in the distance is something I'm drawn to doing more. My sense of smell is almost overwhelmingly good. Anyway, I think I'm going to take a break from Sunifram for a while. The mild depression is definitely a deal breaker.

Edited by abelard lindsay, 23 April 2013 - 04:33 AM.


#1463 owtsgmi

  • Guest
  • 162 posts
  • 23
  • Location:Los Angeles, CA

Posted 23 April 2013 - 04:56 AM

Tbe Sunifram interaction with CiLTEP is weird. It's three days after I took my second dose and I'm feeling a little... depressed. It's probably a high choline depression. I had to take some idebenone to get some relief. Also, I'm feeling a little warm at times. This is almost certainly the Sunifram because I was taking Zembrin for two weeks without problems. Other weird things that are happening are I am a little too fascinated with people on the street and what they are wearing. I find all the curves, colors and corners of people's outfits strangely fascinating. I find visually focusing at points far off in the distance is something I'm drawn to doing more. My sense of smell is almost overwhelmingly good. Anyway, I think I'm going to take a break from Sunifram for a while. The mild depression is definitely a deal breaker.


I am a surprised that taking 5mg of Sunifram per week could actually affect you 3 days after the fact. I have been taking CILTEP (artichoke) with Sunifram (day 7) and am liking the combination quite a bit. I have been taking 10mg BID every other day, alternating with 10mg morning-only the other days. I notice a good am wakeup (kinda sunny :cool: ) and I notice good positive mood from 30min after my morning dose until about say 2-3pm, with only a mild tail-off through the evening. Right now it is almost 10pm and I took 10mg Sunifram at 9am. I feel tired and have subdued feelings, but not depression or anything that bad. I don't mind it since I am winding down for the night and don't want to have sunny feelings 24/7. All in all I am pretty happy with the combo. I am monitoring my BP and if it stays OK for another week or so, I am going to try the Zembrin for my CILTEP. You may want to give coluracetam a go instead of Sunifram (if you can get some) if you actually think the Sunifram is making you depressed.

#1464 chung_pao

  • Guest
  • 352 posts
  • 92
  • Location:Sweden.

Posted 23 April 2013 - 06:52 PM

I'll definitely vouch for Zembrin.

I've tried Forskolin + Zembrin and Modafinil + Zembrin.
Forskolin + Zembrin just needs a bit of a push with caffeine, or any other stimulant, but recall of information is significantly improved.
I find the serotonin mildly antagonistic to motivation, but a little bit of caffeine and it's a perfect stack.
Zembrin is more noticeable than artichoke, by far.

Modafinil + Zembrin is much more potent imo. But unsurprisingly, it also comes with side-effects, as opposed to Forskolin + Zembrin.
Both are very potent combinations. The first version can probably be used on a daily basis (5 days a week), while the second alternative is something better saved for "emergencies".

The sunifiram, on the other hand, I can't vouch for. It's very erratic and unpredictable in its effects. Sometimes it makes me slightly depressed, demotivated and sleepy. But, after waking up I'm usually more energized than usual.
In contrast, the first time I took it I experienced increased thermogenesis, heart beat and excitation.

Edited by chung_pao, 23 April 2013 - 06:54 PM.


#1465 DamnedOwl

  • Guest
  • 120 posts
  • 33
  • Location:Frankfurt am Main

Posted 23 April 2013 - 07:31 PM

Personally, I've found it difficult to stabilize the forskolin+artichoke for myself.

It definitely works in that I experience a genuinely beneficial 3 hours, but it's just that is followed by a crash.

Now, I only tried it for 1 week, so I do believe that I could still experiment more with the amount and frequency of the doses, but I only managed to avoid the afternoon crash the once, and that was by taking 350mg of NALT and 200mg of caffeine. Unfortunately, the other days I wasn't able to replicate this effect and the crashes pretty much made those days write-offs.

Worse still was that I was getting less sleep and that it generally seemed to be marked by a greater number of interruptions.

I haven't given up hope with it because I think those 3 hour morning high-points are warrant further experimentation.

Anyway, I've got some zembrin on order, so I'll see whether that makes a difference (although I get the impression it could just make the afternoon crashes all the more nasty, but we'll see).

Modafinil + Zembrin is much more potent imo. But unsurprisingly, it also comes with side-effects, as opposed to Forskolin + Zembrin.
Both are very potent combinations. The first version can probably be used on a daily basis (5 days a week), while the second alternative is something better saved for "emergencies".


What were the side-effects you experienced from the modafinil+zembrin?

I'm interested because modafinil is a particular favourite of mine, and something I had in mind to try with the zembrin.
  • like x 1

#1466 peakplasma

  • Guest
  • 341 posts
  • 85
  • Location:Canada sometimes Philadelphia
  • NO

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:08 PM

I also have tried Modafinil + Zembrin a few times now and found it very effective but it can sometimes be a bit overwhelming. It produces a bit of "restlessness" that can only be alleviated by channeling the energy into a productive task. Also, not much side effects except for a slight pressure above my left temple and transient muscle cramps in the comedown.

As for CILTEP with Forskolin... I'd like to say that I have tried Zembrin a few times now and I feel it is not as effective as Kanna powder in terms of producing the amazing "profound clarity and focus". However, Kanna has more side effects than Zembrin and it seems to be shorter in duration.

I think that I will try combining a Zembrin with a small amount of Kanna powder to see if I can strike a balance.

In the future, I would like to do my own extract on the raw Kanna... does anyone have any ideas how the Zembrin extract was made?

#1467 chung_pao

  • Guest
  • 352 posts
  • 92
  • Location:Sweden.

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:16 PM

What were the side-effects you experienced from the modafinil+zembrin?

I'm interested because modafinil is a particular favourite of mine, and something I had in mind to try with the zembrin.



The side effects I experience from Moda isn't affected or caused by Zembrin.
I'm referring to the headache and obvious withdrawal (constituting opposite effects of the drug) and disrupted sleep-quality I experience from it.

Edited by chung_pao, 23 April 2013 - 08:17 PM.


#1468 Reformed-Redan

  • Guest
  • 2,200 posts
  • -9
  • Location:Thousand Oaks, CA

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:25 PM

Are you guys getting the same "photographic memory" abelard lindsay is getting? I take such statements as, "omfsg I got photographic memory from taking X" with a grain of salt.

#1469 middpanther88

  • Guest
  • 185 posts
  • -4

Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:36 PM

^ wondering the same thing. How does it compare to other stacks? Can you just look at something without really studying it, and recall it all later? How long do the memories last?

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#1470 peakplasma

  • Guest
  • 341 posts
  • 85
  • Location:Canada sometimes Philadelphia
  • NO

Posted 23 April 2013 - 09:19 PM

What? Photographic memory? No way, not me but I'm sure everyone is different.

For me I get a feeling of calm, clean focus. There is less noise in my thoughts... in between my thoughts I get moments of mental silence where I only hear my breath. Unlike normally where I get random thoughts, noises and distractions popping into my head. Recalling something is like slicing butter instead of peeling a potato... lol.

This feeling is most pronounced on the raw fermented Kanna but it happens with Zembrin too.

Edited by peakplasma, 23 April 2013 - 09:21 PM.






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: ciltep, pde4, forskolin, ltp

43 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 43 guests, 0 anonymous users

Topic Led By