Would it better to administer sublingually or as eye drops (to my hamster)?
Are hamsters allowed by the FDA, or just rats?
Edited by 1kgcoffee, 20 December 2011 - 08:12 PM.
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:11 PM
Edited by 1kgcoffee, 20 December 2011 - 08:12 PM.
Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:52 PM
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:25 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:06 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:28 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 08:30 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 09:34 AM
What makes someone want to try astragalus in the first place? The answer to that is also the answer to trying Epitholan.
Why try at all? Data, hope, plan for a positive reaction.
Apart from the that, it is fairly well documented that Asragalus can help with maintaining, or in the case of TA-65, replenish up to the extent of the longest telomere, but so far there is no clear lab research to show that it can over come the hayflick limit. Where as, Epithalon has been proven, in the lab, not only to be able to over come the hayflick limit, to some extent, but also can inhibit cancer and up regulates melatonin.
http://morelife.org/...rs/12937682.pdf
http://mt.china-papers.com/2/?p=111228
So, as I said before, the why is in the try and the try is in percieved hope.
I hope that helps?
Edited by Ampa-omega, 04 January 2012 - 09:35 AM.
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:19 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:35 AM
Edited by AdamI, 04 January 2012 - 11:35 AM.
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:38 AM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 12:18 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 12:21 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 12:21 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 12:30 PM
Edited by Ampa-omega, 04 January 2012 - 12:31 PM.
Posted 04 January 2012 - 02:42 PM
has there been any scientific comparison of epithalon vs the astragalus molecules, i mean by this time a scientist would have examined both in comparison, right?
Posted 04 January 2012 - 02:55 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 05:01 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:07 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:14 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 06:23 PM
Posted 04 January 2012 - 11:41 PM
Posted 05 January 2012 - 12:15 AM
thanks for the heads up for research sources sciwalk,will look at that, i find it interesting that perhaps this may be a "overlooked" telomere activator, if thats what you guys are implying, you want to use epitalon as it might actually have an effect on telomeres that cyloastrogenol doesnt,
i also dont see the reason to take both cycloastrogenol and epitalon if one may actually have an significant effect
Posted 05 January 2012 - 05:13 AM
Posted 05 January 2012 - 09:40 AM
Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:03 PM
sciwalk,
Can you IM me with info about it, or do we have enough folks who want to join in on a purchase from the source that SmithX mentioned? I certainly would like to have our Dr. ty it in a petri dish, then maybe on a big mouse...
A
Posted 05 January 2012 - 08:45 PM
sciwalk,
Can you IM me with info about it, or do we have enough folks who want to join in on a purchase from the source that SmithX mentioned? I certainly would like to have our Dr. ty it in a petri dish, then maybe on a big mouse...
A
Posted 06 January 2012 - 12:34 AM
Posted 11 January 2012 - 08:46 PM
Posted 11 January 2012 - 11:04 PM
before you get carried away you should read the whole of this paper. The crucial facts are in the tables and graphs at the end. The epitalon treated group had a lower average life span.
Posted 15 January 2012 - 06:32 PM
http://www.demogr.mp...pitalon-SHR.pdf
before you get carried away you should read the whole of this paper. The crucial facts are in the tables and graphs at the end. The epitalon treated group had a lower average life span. If you want to gamble on being in the lucky 10% who had an extended life span by all means try it.
0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users