You used some big words there, but I'm not sure you know what they mean. You also seem to have changed your tune dramatically about your role in the research since people started calling you out on your nonsense.
If you could provide some sort of verification like that, it would set aside my doubts. MIT is a pretty transparent institution, from everything I can gather and seems to make pretty big deals out of what seems like paltry sums compared to your 5 million dollar research grant. I'm sure they'd publicize the heck out of it, if that were the case.
No you are missing the point! He explicitly mentioned its top secret and cannot be disclosed... The ultimate nootropic has to be kept under wraps by the secret team at MIT...
I AM PART OF A SECRET TEAM AT OXFORD TRYING TO CURE ALL DISEASES AT A CELLULAR LEVEL. WE'RE ABOUT 69% DONE. SORRY I CAN'T SAY MORE, IT'S MY CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT. TOP SECRET STUFF MY FRIEND! Better just take my word for it! - Supercosmos36
I have no need to prove anything since the time and effort that it takes prove my admittance at MIT is not worth it.
Hyperspace21, you put so much effort into defending yourself verbally and yet you're too lazy to make a MIT.edu address? Isn't this really embarrassing by now?
Then why brag about it? It was obviously worth it enough for you to mention it over and over in both your posts and your profile. Do you think people are just going to take it for granted and be like oh this guys an expert? You seem to write everything in simple terms and justify it by saying that you are making it easier on 'the layman'. What do unverified credentials grant you other than some temporary illusory superiority to a gullible few?
Edited by hooter, 03 March 2012 - 03:17 PM.