The difference is stark; perhaps, though, contrast more evenly by taking another photo in less favourable light.
C60 Surprises - Anecdotes Of Unique Health Benefits
#481
Posted 15 January 2015 - 11:21 PM
#482
Posted 15 January 2015 - 11:58 PM
The lighting is too different between these photos, and honestly I cannot tell the difference.
An experiment like this is ideally done with a 5 megapixel dental camera, which can take very close up macro photos of surfaces with amazing high resolution. Use the same camera and same lighting for both photos, and then we will be able to see fine details of graying on each hair.
A good search criteria for these on eBay would be:
dental camera (5,5.0) mp
That's an 8mp cell phone camera
And i can't after the fact do it. -- I pulled a pic that showed my dark beard
I have one other, but it was when I was tanning daily
Longecity actually kills the resolution, not my camera -- the native pics are about 1MB -- longecity upload dropped them to 90kb
A good trick for importing images might be to open a tumblr account, create a Photo post that you save as a "draft" and then get the URLs to the images from that.
Here is what a good high resolution photo of hair looks like:
http://s3.amazonaws....jan_20_2011.jpg
When I open up your two images I see what look like about equal amounts of grey hair in both, but the focus is off and maybe I am just not observant of minor differences that you see immediately.
Edited by pone11, 15 January 2015 - 11:58 PM.
#483
Posted 16 January 2015 - 12:10 AM
Here is what a good high resolution photo of hair looks like:
Ok, I gotta ask... What the heck is that? What's that white stuff?
#484
Posted 16 January 2015 - 12:17 AM
Things are happening to my body since I have started taking the dosages I take that I cannot believe.
My beard that had turned a dull brown with salt "gray" sprinkled through by 40, is now coming in with the color it had in my 20's an auburn with gold highlights.
Even the blue in the iris of my eye has started to return to the more vibrant blue of my youth instead of the greyish blue it had become.
This stuff is unbelievable.
C60OO
Pics? This should be a lot easier to show side-by-side than hair regrowth on your head.
Left was taken today
Right was taken Sept 2014
Those are the best I could find with resolution -- yes there was grey in the Sept pic
If you hover over the pic it actually shows the date and timestamp from my phone camera
The lighting is too different between these photos, and honestly I cannot tell the difference.
An experiment like this is ideally done with a 5 megapixel dental camera, which can take very close up macro photos of surfaces with amazing high resolution. Use the same camera and same lighting for both photos, and then we will be able to see fine details of graying on each hair.
A good search criteria for these on eBay would be:
dental camera (5,5.0) mp
I'm probably gonna get downvoted for this but dude, Sensei is providing good data and no one gives a damn about the camera is using. He put in a lot of effort to provide pictures and log his results for the benefit of the community and the only thing you have to say is "mmm, wrong camera, I can't tell anything". Who cares about what you think? Who do you think you are anyways? You're the type of person that pisses people off and make Longecity look like a snobish community and discouraging people from sharing results.
So yeah, go f**** yourself!
#485
Posted 16 January 2015 - 12:21 AM
Here is what a good high resolution photo of hair looks like:
Ok, I gotta ask... What the heck is that? What's that white stuff?
That is some random photo I took from a Google search. I have no idea who it is or what it is. The point is I can see the individual hairs down to the root in very precise focus and in very high resolution.
#486
Posted 16 January 2015 - 12:23 AM
Here is what a good high resolution photo of hair looks like:
Ok, I gotta ask... What the heck is that? What's that white stuff?
I think the white stuff is her scalp -- the pinkinsh stuff looks like squamous cell not a mole like the picture says
http://images.medici...ens-disease.jpg
#487
Posted 16 January 2015 - 12:27 AM
I'm probably gonna get downvoted for this but dude, Sensei is providing good data and no one gives a damn about the camera is using. He put in a lot of effort to provide pictures and log his results for the benefit of the community and the only thing you have to say is "mmm, wrong camera, I can't tell anything". Who cares about what you think? Who do you think you are anyways? You're the type of person that pisses people off and make Longecity look like a snobish community and discouraging people from sharing results.
So yeah, go f**** yourself!
I am sorry to upset you.
It is not the end of the world if some people can see a difference in those images and others cannot? Why is that worth being upset about?
If I hold back and do not say that I cannot see a big difference between these photos, how does that make Longecity a better site? When people do not share the same opinions about some fact, they should not say it? Maybe help me to say it in a way that you would find more polite?
People call me out on my facts all the time. I not only do not get upset, but I love that they do this. Discussing controversial science requires a thick skin, and I guess I have that.
I never want to be intentionally rude, and I'm happy to take constructive advice on how to not be rude.
#488
Posted 16 January 2015 - 02:10 AM
Yeah, sorry for being rude and unfriendly. I don't know, something about suggesting to someone doing a case study to buy a new camera seemed rather douchey but my attitude was very wrong so I'm sorry too.
#489
Posted 16 January 2015 - 05:00 AM
Yeah, sorry for being rude and unfriendly. I don't know, something about suggesting to someone doing a case study to buy a new camera seemed rather douchey but my attitude was very wrong so I'm sorry too.
I do see how I might have seemed demanding, but really all I was doing was trying to show people a type of handheld camera that is custom designed to take very high resolution images of skin surfaces. It's perfect for before-and-after photos on beards, hair, skin spots, etc. I understand he cannot go back in time.
My dentist uses one of these, and wow you do not know what is in your mouth until one of these snaps a photo. It's very useful for looking in your own or someone else's mouth.
#490
Posted 16 January 2015 - 04:05 PM
Just thought I would throw in my two cents here since everyone is letting it all hang out. I don't see why we can't mention low res problems if they are an issue. But of course any pictures are better than none. A better camera is always a good thing to have but I wouldn't get one just to post on this site. I suggest we all take a picture of ourselves now, with whatever camera we have, so we will have it for comparison in the future.
#491
Posted 16 January 2015 - 05:24 PM
For my duplication of this experiment. Which is on going. I have been taking high quality images and also have almost daily for the last 4 years as documenting the decline (or not).
28 in 14 months prior to 29th Dec 2014. From 30th Dec 2014 ever other day, 9 so far, last dose 15th Jan. 15 more to go.
Nothing much to report so far but will be interesting to compare when completed.
#492
Posted 16 January 2015 - 07:03 PM
For my duplication of this experiment. Which is on going. I have been taking high quality images and also have almost daily for the last 4 years as documenting the decline (or not).
28 in 14 months prior to 29th Dec 2014. From 30th Dec 2014 ever other day, 9 so far, last dose 15th Jan. 15 more to go.
Nothing much to report so far but will be interesting to compare when completed.
what is the dose you are taking?
#493
Posted 16 January 2015 - 07:16 PM
As far as the C60 dust causing increased toxicity, there is a simple solution - don't breathe the dust! I think we have been over this before. Of course we wouldn't mix C60 dust with toxic fumes - we aren't idiots. Who comes up with these bizarre research ideas? Just to be clear, we are taking it orally and sometimes topically. Perhaps though it could mix with things after we swallow it? In that case should it always be taken on an empty stomach?
It doesn't matter how or when you take c60oo. Those toxicities are only seen with aggregates, but c60oo is a molecular species. It will not aggregate, outside of the body or inside.
#494
Posted 16 January 2015 - 07:29 PM
It doesn't matter how or when you take c60oo. Those toxicities are only seen with aggregates, but c60oo is a molecular species. It will not aggregate, outside of the body or inside.
Exactly, or the oil in the Baati study would have had big chunky C60 aggregates after sitting in storage for months/years
#495
Posted 16 January 2015 - 08:04 PM
For my duplication of this experiment. Which is on going. I have been taking high quality images and also have almost daily for the last 4 years as documenting the decline (or not).
28 in 14 months prior to 29th Dec 2014. From 30th Dec 2014 ever other day, 9 so far, last dose 15th Jan. 15 more to go.
Nothing much to report so far but will be interesting to compare when completed.
what is the dose you are taking?
Exactly the same as you. One bottle. Buckminsterfullerene C60 99.95%. 45 mg in 50 ml olive oil. Always the morning before food. Washed down with some water (for obvious reasons). Followed by a Coffee. Followed 20 minutes later by Break fast.
#496
Posted 16 January 2015 - 08:10 PM
For my duplication of this experiment. Which is on going. I have been taking high quality images and also have almost daily for the last 4 years as documenting the decline (or not).
28 in 14 months prior to 29th Dec 2014. From 30th Dec 2014 ever other day, 9 so far, last dose 15th Jan. 15 more to go.
Nothing much to report so far but will be interesting to compare when completed.
what is the dose you are taking?
Exactly the same as you. One bottle. Buckminsterfullerene C60 99.95%. 45 mg in 50 ml olive oil. Always the morning before food. Washed down with some water (for obvious reasons). Followed by a Coffee. Followed 20 minutes later by Break fast.
Daily or every other.
FYI -- I just ordered 5 grams of 99.95% C60, so I will be making my own.
I have been taking 45mg every other day when I have a supply (total of 54 bottles since May 2014).
However, I plan to up that to 45mg daily.
I also plan to apply topically to skin to test rejuvenating effects as well.
#497
Posted 16 January 2015 - 08:16 PM
For my duplication of this experiment. Which is on going. I have been taking high quality images and also have almost daily for the last 4 years as documenting the decline (or not).
28 in 14 months prior to 29th Dec 2014. From 30th Dec 2014 ever other day, 9 so far, last dose 15th Jan. 15 more to go.
Nothing much to report so far but will be interesting to compare when completed.
what is the dose you are taking?
Exactly the same as you. One bottle. Buckminsterfullerene C60 99.95%. 45 mg in 50 ml olive oil. Always the morning before food. Washed down with some water (for obvious reasons). Followed by a Coffee. Followed 20 minutes later by Break fast.
Daily or every other.
FYI -- I just ordered 5 grams of 99.95% C60, so I will be making my own.
I have been taking 45mg every other day when I have a supply (total of 54 bottles since May 2014).
However, I plan to up that to 45mg daily.
I also plan to apply topically to skin to test rejuvenating effects as well.
I have not been using dermarolling with the little left but I have applied it to the scalp. Similar hair covering as you. When are you going to shift to daily. To continue I will need to purchase from the same supplier and make it in the same way you are. (Same oil and same method)
#498
Posted 16 January 2015 - 08:32 PM
I have not been using dermarolling with the little left but I have applied it to the scalp. Similar hair covering as you. When are you going to shift to daily. To continue I will need to purchase from the same supplier and make it in the same way you are. (Same oil and same method)
Ses research is the C60 vendor -- 99.95% pure
I will probably buy an artisan olive oil from a local specialty shop -- I want a lighter oil -- I want to be able to see the magenta color easily. Apparently the darker colored olive oil leads to a brownish C60OO.
I have not dermarolled since the report on my log. And topical application is still intermittent.
To be honest, about the hair regrowth I usually keep it so closely clippered that it does not matter -- although it would be great if it continues.
The re-coloration of my beard, and loss of gray from head, beard, chest, and crotch however is something that points to a rejuvenating effect.
I am now taking a tincture of astragalus equivalent to 20 grams root approximately 2-3 times per week, as well as goji.
#499
Posted 16 January 2015 - 11:05 PM
I have not been using dermarolling with the little left but I have applied it to the scalp. Similar hair covering as you. When are you going to shift to daily. To continue I will need to purchase from the same supplier and make it in the same way you are. (Same oil and same method)
Ses research is the C60 vendor -- 99.95% pure
I will probably buy an artisan olive oil from a local specialty shop -- I want a lighter oil -- I want to be able to see the magenta color easily. Apparently the darker colored olive oil leads to a brownish C60OO.
I have not dermarolled since the report on my log. And topical application is still intermittent.
To be honest, about the hair regrowth I usually keep it so closely clippered that it does not matter -- although it would be great if it continues.
The re-coloration of my beard, and loss of gray from head, beard, chest, and crotch however is something that points to a rejuvenating effect.
I am now taking a tincture of astragalus equivalent to 20 grams root approximately 2-3 times per week, as well as goji.
Do you have hair that is half gray? I am looking for black growth from the root on a gray hair. Will supply photo if and when this starts to happen. I would hope by month end that there will be evidence of this.
#500
Posted 17 January 2015 - 12:00 AM
Do you have hair that is half gray? I am looking for black growth from the root on a gray hair. Will supply photo if and when this starts to happen. I would hope by month end that there will be evidence of this.
Shave your head -- then you can definitely tell if new growth is dark.
That's what I do.
And no, I don't have gray in my hair anymore
Edited by sensei, 17 January 2015 - 12:01 AM.
#501
Posted 17 January 2015 - 12:30 AM
Do you have hair that is half gray? I am looking for black growth from the root on a gray hair. Will supply photo if and when this starts to happen. I would hope by month end that there will be evidence of this.
Shave your head -- then you can definitely tell if new growth is dark.
That's what I do.
And no, I don't have gray in my hair anymore
Not your head but elsewhere. Unless you are saying you are shaving there as well? No gray at all? From what % of Gray on the rest of your body to now?
Edited by resting, 17 January 2015 - 12:31 AM.
#502
Posted 17 January 2015 - 01:57 AM
Not your head but elsewhere. Unless you are saying you are shaving there as well? No gray at all? From what % of Gray on the rest of your body to now?
Yes I shave my chest and other areas.
Chest still has some gray but much less.
Crotch virtually all gray has disappeared.
#503
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:10 AM
The lighting is too different between these photos, and honestly I cannot tell the difference.
An experiment like this is ideally done with a 5 megapixel dental camera, which can take very close up macro photos of surfaces with amazing high resolution. Use the same camera and same lighting for both photos, and then we will be able to see fine details of graying on each hair.
A good search criteria for these on eBay would be:
dental camera (5,5.0) mp
That's an 8mp cell phone camera
And i can't after the fact do it. -- I pulled a pic that showed my dark beard
I have one other, but it was when I was tanning daily
Longecity actually kills the resolution, not my camera -- the native pics are about 1MB -- longecity upload dropped them to 90kb
I drank my entire 1 L / 600 mg bottle of homemade C60oo today and I can see both images in full megapixel resolution. I can also see the rest of sensei's face. And his past and future.
#504
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:12 AM
I drank my entire 1 L / 600 mg bottle of homemade C60oo today and I can see both images in full megapixel resolution. I can also see the rest of sensei's face. And his past and future.
Was that before or after you were able to get off the crapper?
ROTFLMAO
#505
Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:56 AM
As far as the C60 dust causing increased toxicity, there is a simple solution - don't breathe the dust! I think we have been over this before. Of course we wouldn't mix C60 dust with toxic fumes - we aren't idiots. Who comes up with these bizarre research ideas? Just to be clear, we are taking it orally and sometimes topically. Perhaps though it could mix with things after we swallow it? In that case should it always be taken on an empty stomach?
It doesn't matter how or when you take c60oo. Those toxicities are only seen with aggregates, but c60oo is a molecular species. It will not aggregate, outside of the body or inside.
The Baati study did find crystal formation among animals getting the highest doses--
While transmission electron microscopy (TEM) at D8 after i.p.administration shows numerous spleen macrophages laden C60crystals (Fig. 2e) only some C60 crystals were observed inside livermacrophages and very rare crystals in lung (Fig. 2f) and kidney cells(Fig. 2g).
#506
Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:08 AM
The Baati study did find crystal formation among animals getting the highest doses--
I thought the animals only got 1 level of dosage 1.7mg/kg by gavage.
Was this a sub-study?
If so what were these "highest dosages"
#507
Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:16 AM
The Baati study did find crystal formation among animals getting the highest doses--
I thought the animals only got 1 level of dosage 1.7mg/kg by gavage.
Was this a sub-study?
If so what were these "highest dosages"
Here is the paper. There was more than one dosing protocol.
#508
Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:26 AM
The Baati study did find crystal formation among animals getting the highest doses--
I thought the animals only got 1 level of dosage 1.7mg/kg by gavage.
Was this a sub-study?
If so what were these "highest dosages"
Here is the paper. There was more than one dosing protocol.
I stand informed.
But -- that was only seen in the rats given 4mg/kg by IP injection -- not by the rats given oral gavage even at 4mg/kg.
I'm not about to inject 320mg/400ml of C60OO into my body cavity every day for 7 days .
Edited by sensei, 18 January 2015 - 04:31 AM.
#509
Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:45 AM
The Baati study did find crystal formation among animals getting the highest doses--
I thought the animals only got 1 level of dosage 1.7mg/kg by gavage.
Was this a sub-study?
If so what were these "highest dosages"
Here is the paper. There was more than one dosing protocol.
I stand informed.
But -- that was only seen in the rats given 4mg/kg by IP injection -- not by the rats given oral gavage even at 4mg/kg.
I'm not about to inject 320mg/400ml of C60OO into my body cavity every day for 7 days .
Good! But keep in mind that the rat studies were conducted over a short period of time, while we humans will (hopefully) be ingesting this stuff over decades. Thus the minimum effective dosage would seem prudent.
#510
Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:49 AM
Good! But keep in mind that the rat studies were conducted over a short period of time, while we humans will (hopefully) be ingesting this stuff over decades. Thus the minimum effective dosage would seem prudent.
From the paper - a little further along:
"The presence
Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: c60, cure, solution, remedy, therapy, improvement
14 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 14 guests, 0 anonymous users