I received my batach from you SL (THANKS!) Have not started it yet as I have an opened bottle still going from International Peptide (which by the way seems to be good stuff). LOTS of people on Reddit are asking where to find it.
Why would hyping the neurogenesis be a problem? That's what it does and it's a good thing. People are consuming all sorts of less effective products. I would wager that a very substantial portion of the adult population has hippocampal function reduction. If not from depression then from stress and prescription drugs (and non-prescription). Flouride as well as mercury in vaccines also kill hippocampal cells. (TRUE) . Flouride alone will shrink and calcify that area of the brain. (Don't use toothpaste that has it.)
I have been giving NSI-189 to someone who is a high achieving, type A person who would not have been classified as typically depressed. However, high stress levels manifested through chronic joint pain, insomnia, teeth-grinding, and angst. In his forties, both his hips had to be resurfaced (not a full replacement). Since I have been administering this product, it's like a cloud has lifted. He is not in physical pain anymore. No more insomnia, no teeth-grinding. Almost no angst. This is a miracle as I finally assumed many of these issues were just part of a personality type. No, they were part of a depression pattern. I will see if this lasts, but so far, amazing.
Hyping neurogenesis is problematic, because it is not proven in humans. In fact the NSI-189 phase 1b trial didn't mention any neurogenesis even though they did neuroimaging on their subjects, so they should have been able to detect it. Either there was no neurogenesis in vivo, or they particularly chose to not lose a single word on it in their phase 1b presentation. You could find arguments for both, but as of yet we do not know if the apparently statistically significant antidepressive effects of NSI really do come from neurogenesis.
What truly amazes me is that when you try to share something you think might help someone, and you've said NOTHING OFFENSIVE, you get a "dislike" click. As a female person, it usually happens when people figure out I'm not male. Wow, really? What was there to "dislike" in an honest discussion of how I believe NSI-189 might have helped someone? You really have to be angry and depressed to find fault with that comment.
I do not believe that people dislike your opinions because you are a women, but because comments like 'Flouride as well as mercury in vaccines also kill hippocampal cells. (TRUE)' is a damaging conspiracy theory statement that has little to no scientific evidence:
https://en.wikipedia...sal_controversy
The thiomersal controversy describes claims that vaccines containing the mercury-based preservative thiomersal contribute to the development of autism and other brain development disorders.[1] The current scientific consensus is that no convincing scientific evidence supports these claims,[2][3] and a 2011 journal article described the vaccine-autism connection as "the most damaging medical hoax of the last 100 years".[4]
Poorly researched statements like that also make the rest of your post sound non-credible.
Negative feedback is meant to help you question the validity and reasoning behind your answer. This is a scientific community and not a popularity contest, so you shouldn't feel insulted over it.
First of all, you'd have to be ten years old, or eighty-five not to know that Pharma companies and others with an agenda, regularly write Wikipedia pages. They are often wrong, or very misleading. If you believe fluoride is okay, or mercury, go right ahead and consume all you want. I have done a ton of research as well, with experts, and have come to a very different conclusion. Just because someone doesn't mirror your consensus-reality world view, does not mean they are wrong. Reality itself is completely mailable and is created by how we all collapse the wave into solid particles with our thoughts and beliefs. You are no more in possession of the truth than I am just because you read a Wikipedia page and some Pharma sponsored "papers". Sorry, but the ones who read and believe the mainstream propaganda are often less intelligent and informed. It takes some guts these days to speak out, especially if you are a woman. I really feel for the (former) Reddit CEO, like her or not, the abuse she suffered on the internet makes me think humankind is sinking to a new level of low. (Probably all that mercury and fluoride we've been forced to ingest. LOL) There used to be more geniuses per every 1000 born in the USA. The rate has been slipping. WHY? Environmental toxins and all the crap they shoot into near newborns. Okay, go ahead and only believe your "facts", based on research like that done by Dong-Pyou Han (falsified AIDS research for grant money). Do you think that is an isolated case? No, it's happening all the time. PLEASE~ if you want to sound smart, (or actually be smart) don't quote a pharma page on Wikipedia.