Posted 13 November 2012 - 12:52 PM
Here in Germany we have two sayings, I think they are known in English too: "Truth is concrete!" and "The Devil is in the details!" So I want to know his latest views about the timelines of SENS: Is he still thinking that we have a 50% chance of reaching human escape velocity in 25 years, based on enough funding of 100 Million Dollars a year for ten years (to reach first robust mouse rejuvenation with a 90% chance)? Have the prospects improved in the last years, have they become worse or are they the same?
Second question: How confident is he to get this financial support in the next 5-10 years, especially in the context of global economic crisis? Any special plans, (media-)strategies, initiatives in the nearer future he could speak about? Where is he seeing now the main players, the significant institutions, the relevant target groups after more than ten years of activism?
Third question: Am I right, if I'm saying that the extent of overall support and deriving donations depends on the motivation for the overcoming of aging in general and that all kinds of questions of the desirability of longevity/regenerative medicine or the connected common objections(*) are no questions of scientific or medical feasibility but have a preceding logic of its own: psychological and sociological, political and economical, cultural and ethical, philosophical and spiritual...?
(*like boredom, overpopulation, the tithonus error, "aging is natural", "I don't want to work forever", "extreme longevity is only for the rich", "I don't want to live in a destroyed world", ethical objections, religious attitudes and so on and so on. These objections in the context of desirability represent more than 90% of all discussions in every comment section under every article in the global mainstream media about Aubrey de Grey, SENS and related topics!?)