Wow, don't want to start a new discussion about this, but someone ranked the contents of my post as " Dangerous, Irresponsible".
Apparently attempting to treat a terminal disease with methods that have little side effects is considered irrensponsible. Well I think if anything is irresponsible, it's the 99.99% of the people who DO NOT try everything they can when their loved ones are in such conditions. I am doing this with no profit for myself whatsoever and would LOVE if someone did this for me if I was in their shoes. It's just the rational thing to do. I guess whomever ranked my post dangerous, irresponsible listens to everything doctors says 100% of the time and only chooses mainstream paths in life? That'd be sad. There are ways to make things better without using "old proven methods". It's like someone in a third world country saying you should use a shovel to build a house instead of a bulldozer because "that's the way things are being done around here". Well, in this case, the way "things are being done" with Alzheimer's patients is they are left to die with no chance to stop or reverse their condition. At least in my country. Trying something different than that cannot be irresponsible. And yes, the family is well informed and gives full consent and we give no hopes or any knowledge about the treatment to the patient. And yes, all drugs may have side effects and I believe these substances are safer than Ibuprofen ( I think ) which is recommended by doctors daily but kills hundreds of thousands. So yeah, I think I am an avatar of responsibly: someone who takes responsibility to take action instead of letting people die.