-Not joking.
Edited by Anagram 3.3, 13 October 2013 - 08:42 PM.
Posted 13 October 2013 - 08:40 PM
Edited by Anagram 3.3, 13 October 2013 - 08:42 PM.
Posted 15 October 2013 - 08:58 PM
That is hilarious!
It would be if it wasn't the case that this kind of pseudo science crap is exactly what causes whole fields of unexplored aspects of reality to be left alone with its unparalleled power of inanity - happy to see Turnbuckle give the Mesogold a practical go though, for science (and possible IQ boost)!
Posted 16 October 2013 - 01:55 AM
The same thing happened to Colloidal Silver.
Posted 16 October 2013 - 01:57 AM
The same thing happened to Colloidal Silver.
You mean this?
ColloidalSilverGuy.jpg 10.1KB 14 downloads
Posted 16 October 2013 - 02:39 AM
Posted 17 October 2013 - 03:58 AM
Edited by Anagram 3.3, 17 October 2013 - 03:59 AM.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 12:41 PM
My lungs react terribly to nano particles, especially C60 which is not even an abiological metal like those that make up colloidal silver. I have never actually injested silver nanoparticles, whats that like?
Posted 17 October 2013 - 02:15 PM
Here, we used a mixed primary cell model consisting mainly of neurons and astrocytes and a minor proportion of oligodendrocytes to analyze the effects of well-characterized 20 and 40 nm silver nanoparticles (SNP). Similar gold nanoparticles served as control and proved inert for all endpoints tested. SNP induced a strong size-dependent cytotoxicity.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307608/#!po=50.0000
Posted 17 October 2013 - 02:30 PM
Edited by dz93, 17 October 2013 - 02:35 PM.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 02:37 PM
Again, they used ionic silver. Ionic silver is toxic and will turn you blue. Metallic silver should not be toxic. Just like ionic gold is toxic whereas metallic gold is not.
For comparison, we included ionic silver (solution of 1 and 2μM AgNO3). We assume that these concentrations of ionic silver would rather exceed the amount of ionic silver being released from the SNP. As our SNP are tightly coated with a covalent peptide layer, we actually do not expect any significant dissolution. Ionic silver produced only a minimal amount of ROS, which was comparable to the response measured with the GNP.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 02:41 PM
Edited by dz93, 17 October 2013 - 02:44 PM.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 02:56 PM
Actually, they found ionic silver to be almost as benign as gold NPs.Again, they used ionic silver. Ionic silver is toxic and will turn you blue. Metallic silver should not be toxic. Just like ionic gold is toxic whereas metallic gold is not.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 03:07 PM
Posted 17 October 2013 - 03:11 PM
And on that note; are you still taking the MesoGold and, if yes, do you have anything new to report on that account?
Posted 17 October 2013 - 09:24 PM
The same thing happened to Colloidal Silver.
You mean this?
ColloidalSilverGuy.jpg 10.1KB 14 downloads
Posted 17 October 2013 - 10:58 PM
Edited by Anagram 3.3, 17 October 2013 - 11:01 PM.
Posted 17 October 2013 - 11:21 PM
Well every where that I have read says stay away from ionic silver. I've heard testimonials on forums about people having horrible experiences with ionic silver.
Posted 20 October 2013 - 07:46 PM
Well every where that I have read says stay away from ionic silver. I've heard testimonials on forums about people having horrible experiences with ionic silver.
The people who sell silver NPs seem to set up ionic silver as some sort of bogeyman. They don't seem to have much basis for those statements.
Posted 25 October 2013 - 08:41 PM
Edited by Turnbuckle, 25 October 2013 - 08:42 PM.
Posted 25 October 2013 - 09:08 PM
I've noticed that a number of people on Amazon remarking about enhanced dream recall with Mesogold, and I've experienced this too.
Posted 25 October 2013 - 09:45 PM
I've noticed that a number of people on Amazon remarking about enhanced dream recall with Mesogold, and I've experienced this too.
How much are you using?
Posted 26 October 2013 - 12:25 AM
Posted 26 October 2013 - 07:31 AM
Posted 09 November 2013 - 01:05 AM
Posted 10 November 2013 - 01:10 AM
I've noticed that a number of people on Amazon remarking about enhanced dream recall with Mesogold, and I've experienced this too. I've also had an hallucinatory experience that was new to me. I dreamed that two men were coming into the bedroom and I jerked up, wide awake. Two men with guitars. Within seconds they broke up and disappeared, as if dream stuff had slipped into the real world.
Edited by Animal, 10 November 2013 - 01:11 AM.
Posted 10 November 2013 - 01:31 PM
Hello
What is the minimal gold particle size in Aurasol food supplement your company is offering. What is the possibility it being under 3 nm??? If and then what kind of modifications are made in basic G. Frens process - I assume this is the method Aurasol colloidal gold is made. My concerns are based on several animal in vivo studies and several in vitro studies that show that colloidal particles under the size of 2,5- 2nm are hazardous.Thus, although at first glance the possible cytotox
icity of gold nanospheres is rather contradictory, we
came to the conclusion that, in general, overall exper
imental data suggest an inference complying with the
majority of works, namely, that if the upper limit of the
particle concentration does not exceed 1012 parti
cles/ml, then colloidal GNPs do not display cytotox
icity down to small sizes of 3–5 nm. The lower limit of
toxicity relative to the GNP diameters is 1–2 nm and
is determined by their ability to irreversibly bind to key
biomolecules (DNA and others) and change the func
tioning of cellular molecular processes.It was noted in the above mentioned paper [56]
that the high toxicity of 1.4nm Au55 clusters can be
associated with a size similarity to Bform DNA.
Thus, these works suggest that a transition to the sizes
of classical colloid particles (15 nm) drastically
decreases cytotoxicity when compared with atomic
clusters of about 1–2 nm, which are capable of irre
versibly binding to DNA and, possibly, other key mol
ecules.
With Best Regards
Mait ___________
Our Particle size on the Aurasol is between 3-10nm.
We will be mailing you the studies/articles written by Dr. Abraham.
Best to you,
Gina Jauregui
On behalf of Dr. Guy Abraham M.D
Dear Mait,
I read the paper you sent. The toxicity in these studies can be attributed to the carrier substance used, not the gold colloids themselves. The recommendations by the authors are word for word what I recommended almost 20 years ago in the evaluation of gold colloids. I am mailing you some publications on colloidal gold.
(see the monograph I am sending you)
Best to you,
Dr. Guy E. Abraham M.D
Please note that the colloidal gold particles less than 2nm that cause problem were complex to toxic chemicals which could be the cause of this negative effect.
Best to you,
Dr. Guy E. Abraham M.D
See Attached for your information-
A particle distribution of the last batch
The smallest particle is 2.2 & the largest is 8.8
Best to you
According to this Mesogold's particle distribution is quite dense at sub 2nm area, which can cause problems, whereas Aurasol (see excel attachment received from G.E. Abraham) does not seem to have high amount of particles in sub 2nm area.Mesogold particle size distribution: http://www.purestcol...om/MesoGold.pdf
Quote
In addition, the authors demonstrated that 1.4nm clusters induced cell necrosis after 12h incubation and that 1.2nm clusters induced apoptosis. Data on the toxicity of 1.4nm gold clusters to healthy and tumor human cells were also assessed by Tsoli et al. [133]. It was noted in the abovementioned paper [56]
that the high toxicity of 1.4nm Au55 clusters can be associated with a size similarity to Bform DNA. Thus, these works suggest that a transition to the sizes of classical colloid particles (15 nm) drastically decreases cytotoxicity when compared with atomic clusters of about 1–2 nm, which are capable of irreversibly binding to DNA and, possibly, other key molecules.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/21082078
Edited by mait, 10 November 2013 - 01:36 PM.
Posted 29 July 2014 - 02:00 PM
Quote
In addition, the authors demonstrated that 1.4nm clusters induced cell necrosis after 12h incubation and that 1.2nm clusters induced apoptosis. Data on the toxicity of 1.4nm gold clusters to healthy and tumor human cells were also assessed by Tsoli et al. [133]. It was noted in the abovementioned paper [56]
that the high toxicity of 1.4nm Au55 clusters can be associated with a size similarity to Bform DNA. Thus, these works suggest that a transition to the sizes of classical colloid particles (15 nm) drastically decreases cytotoxicity when compared with atomic clusters of about 1–2 nm, which are capable of irreversibly binding to DNA and, possibly, other key molecules.
Source: http://www.ncbi.nlm....pubmed/21082078
Few negative opinions about monotomic gold:
http://www.life-enth...mus-a-1273.html
http://educate-yours...ce15aug05.shtml
http://educate-yours...in24jan07.shtml
Posted 30 July 2014 - 11:34 AM
Few negative opinions about monotomic gold:
http://www.life-enth...mus-a-1273.html
http://educate-yours...ce15aug05.shtml
http://educate-yours...in24jan07.shtml
Precautionary note from Ken Adachi:
[Readers should be aware that Anna Hayes mentions in her books that taking mono atomic gold is ultimately harmful. She claims that the initial growth of psychic awareness is not permanent, but rather levels off and later declines. Further, she says that the promotion of mono atomic gold is an Illuminati deception. While attracting the public with sugar plums of enhanced psychic clarity and improved health, the ulterior purpose of promoting mono atomic gold is to cause the destruction of the ten additional virtual DNA strands which all humans possess and which are now manifesting into 3D reality as seen with the 3, 4, or even 5 strands of DNA that now show up in the blood of Blue Indigo (Millennium) children.
Posted 30 July 2014 - 04:11 PM
I'm not sure that even enhanced psychic clarity would be worth the loss of my ten additional virtual DNA strands, and I really don't want this shit manifesting into 3D reality. Damn those Illuminati deceivers! Besides, I haven't even bought the 3D glasses for my Sony Bravia TV yet, so how would I know even if it did happen to manifest in that way?
Edited by Methos000, 30 July 2014 - 04:16 PM.
Posted 31 July 2014 - 03:41 AM
In Korea and maybe other parts of the world? suddenly about a year ago these Nano Gold and Nano Silver toothbrushes http://www.royaldent...ts/toothbrushes were everywhere.
0 members, 22 guests, 0 anonymous users