You bring up some good points. It always seems so silly to me for people to argue against immortality based on population concerns. Based on the number of people who are thrown away or already live less than full lives in developed nations, we already have a higher birthrate than we can manage. Immortality will be a vast improvement. Considering the people who "fall through the cracks" etc. due to time constraints and other factors of a short life.
Consider the modern family, most people get through it ok, some stay ignorant longer than others, and some want nothing to do with it. Why does this happen? Competing priorities, bucket lists, and all the other demands of life prevent us from devoting adequate energies into raising the children who are born and having to use blanket parenting techniques. The result of this is a need to harm the neglected for the social benefit of rest.
Consider the future family. Jane and Joe Immortalist raise kids after being around for 500 years during a period of retirement and all their kids are raised properly with the assistance of a 100% accurate mind reading AI that connects via the child's cyberization link that is always there to make sure things go well. The child, parents and the AI are thus lifelong friends with full lives and in the event that something does go wrong, there is always the possibility of what I call "Relive" which means the backup and erasure of one's mind and a fresh start until the technology is developed to get it right. The Relive memories are then available to the one reliving and provide a legacy and record of the efforts of mankind. Thus a child who might otherwise be looked down upon and have no other place in society except to be ignorant is a triumphant successful achievement and the culmination of mankind's effort. Today, it is a success when we establish ignorance in an individual who we have failed.
Further, all people would be born sterile (but functioning) and new births would be determined by the carying capacity of orbital colonies and the number of kids going through the Relive program. So every person who wanted to have children would be qualified by their participation and achievements in improving the Relive program, assistive AIs, and parenting in general. If the number of kids in the Relive program was high, fewer fertilities would be granted thus allowing more resources to be allocated to lowering the number of kids in the Relive program. This would ensure an adequate balance of expansion, resource allocation, and technical development. No child would thus be born who would not achieve equal standing as an adult.
If you've read Cordwainer Smith's Norstrillia, Relive is alot like what the protagonist goes through 4 times before getting sprung by the Lord Redlady, but without the laughing deathgas (culling) for those failing the test. Instead, you just get put through Relive until you come out and all is well.
The culture also makes a habit of killing immortals where other solutions could be found that don't require killing people and creating Minds for the sole purpose of their wartime cruelty. But books are written for entertainment, if shit doesn't hit the fan and characters don't die the reader doesn't cry and buy the next book to try to replace the character
I've been thinking I should write a story about Relive comparing the relive experience of a cryonicist with the story of his past and also to a native future newborn up "at bat" for the first time. What do you think? I don't know if I'll have enough time for it, but it would make a cool LongeCity blog IMO.
I tend to think that in order for new births to be determined by deaths, that would mean giving up on someone who died in a car accident. It gets pretty hard to be "all dead" once cryonics succeeds. If your brain gets splattered on the pavement and you've been backing up your cyber brain to the cloud, then as long as there is some of you left, even bits that can be put back together, you can be brought at least mostly back to life. I imagine they'll have special ambulances for that kind of thing where they have a bunch of cryoprotectant and they use it to wash your road pizza into a vat where you are then cryopreserved until such time as science can fix you. With Helium (#2) and Nitrogen (#7) being as abundant as it is in the universe, I imagine we should have no problem finding the materials we need to maintain this. So you'd pretty much have to be atomized, vaporized or digested by a space alien's dog to be unrecoverable. There is also the problem of not bringing someone back if there isn't enough room for them because they've been replaced by someone else. I imagine deaths would only be considered final when someone chooses it. Some might still decide to take part in cryosleep, or just extended sleeping to make room for more people. Once you're immortal, it doesn't matter if you sleep for 10 days at a time and just dream or work on stuff in your head because you're not getting any older and machines have relegated humanity to volunteerism and those most important of tasks (I forget the exact words I'm trying to quote here, but I'm probably looking at the quote through the zoom lens of immortality anyways), you could even dream/work with friends in this state. I supposed they would call it "low energy recouperative biostasis"
Robert Ettinger wrote some interesting books, I've only read some of them, they are somewhat dated, but good reads if you get a chance. Now that I've thought about it, I think I'll start writing some of that book. I'm getting lots of ideas all of a sudden. I'll take suggestions from the LC community for different subjects to cover too. I think this could be interesting, though I might need some help with the grammar of narrative writing.
Edited by cryonicsculture, 01 January 2014 - 12:17 AM.