New wonder drug...
http://m.theage.com....1220-2zohf.html
Posted 19 December 2013 - 08:44 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 08:50 PM
Researchers have discovered a cause of aging in mammals that may be reversible.
The essence of this finding is a series of molecular events that enable communication inside cells between the nucleus and mitochondria. As communication breaks down, aging accelerates. By administering a molecule naturally produced by the human body, scientists restored the communication network in older mice. Subsequent tissue samples showed key biological hallmarks that were comparable to those of much younger animals.
“The aging process we discovered is like a married couple—when they are young, they communicate well, but over time, living in close quarters for many years, communication breaks down,” said Harvard Medical School Professor of Genetics David Sinclair, senior author on the study. “And just like with a couple, restoring communication solved the problem.”
This study was a joint project between Harvard Medical School, the National Institute on Aging, and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, where Sinclair also holds a position.
The findings are published Dec. 19 in Cell.
Communication breakdown
Mitochondria are often referred to as the cell's "powerhouse," generating chemical energy to carry out essential biological functions. These self-contained organelles, which live inside our cells and house their own small genomes, have long been identified as key biological players in aging. As they become increasingly dysfunctional overtime, many age-related conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes gradually set in....
...Ana Gomes, a postdoctoral scientist in the Sinclair lab, had been studying mice in which this SIRT1 gene had been removed. While they accurately predicted that these mice would show signs of aging, including mitochondrial dysfunction, the researchers were surprised to find that most mitochondrial proteins coming from the cell’s nucleus were at normal levels; only those encoded by the mitochondrial genome were reduced.
“This was at odds with what the literature suggested,” said Gomes.
As Gomes and her colleagues investigated potential causes for this, they discovered an intricate cascade of events that begins with a chemical called NAD and concludes with a key molecule that shuttles information and coordinates activities between the cell’s nuclear genome and the mitochondrial genome. Cells stay healthy as long as coordination between the genomes remains fluid. SIRT1’s role is intermediary, akin to a security guard; it assures that a meddlesome molecule called HIF-1 does not interfere with communication.
For reasons still unclear, as we age, levels of the initial chemical NAD decline. Without sufficient NAD, SIRT1 loses its ability to keep tabs on HIF-1. Levels of HIF-1 escalate and begin wreaking havoc on the otherwise smooth cross-genome communication. Over time, the research team found, this loss of communication reduces the cell's ability to make energy, and signs of aging and disease become apparent.
“This particular component of the aging process had never before been described,” said Gomes.
Posted 19 December 2013 - 09:03 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 09:06 PM
Edited by Elus, 19 December 2013 - 09:07 PM.
Posted 19 December 2013 - 09:51 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 10:03 PM
Edited by Darryl, 19 December 2013 - 10:18 PM.
Posted 19 December 2013 - 10:15 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 10:21 PM
Edited by Hebbeh, 19 December 2013 - 10:24 PM.
Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:15 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:28 PM
As far as I can tell, its beta-Nicotinamide mononucleotide. Dr. Sinclair is by no means on the ground floor.
Edited by timar, 19 December 2013 - 11:34 PM.
Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:57 PM
Posted 19 December 2013 - 11:59 PM
Here's another article on the study indicating they used a mouse dosage of 500 mg/kg.
http://www.news.com....d-1226786877989
Howard
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:07 AM
This article refers to it as NMN which sounds more like beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide than Nicotinamide Riboside. Also they say they injected it, anyone know if beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide is normally injected and if 500mg/kg would be considered safe?
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:13 AM
This article refers to it as NMN which sounds more like beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide than Nicotinamide Riboside. Also they say they injected it, anyone know if beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide is normally injected and if 500mg/kg would be considered safe?
Both are intermediaries for NAD. It is the end result of increasing NAD that performs the supposed magic.
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:18 AM
Also wonder if these chemicals have been around for a while, how come no one noticed this before? Is it the dose?
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:20 AM
This article refers to it as NMN which sounds more like beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide than Nicotinamide Riboside. Also they say they injected it, anyone know if beta-Nicotinamide MonoNucleotide is normally injected and if 500mg/kg would be considered safe?
Both are intermediaries for NAD. It is the end result of increasing NAD that performs the supposed magic.
I realise this, however, I think the implication here is that one is orders of magnitude more effective that all others. If I pop a lot of Niacin, I probably won't get the same effect or at least not to the same level. The articles seem to imply that the NAD production is way up, like the floodgates have been opened. Not sure that Riboside does this. Also wonder if these chemicals have been around for a while, how come no one noticed this before? Is it the dose?
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:26 AM
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:28 AM
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:30 AM
If I pop a lot of Niacin, I probably won't get the same effect or at least not to the same level. The articles seem to imply that the NAD production is way up, like the floodgates have been opened. Not sure that Riboside does this. Also wonder if these chemicals have been around for a while, how come no one noticed this before? Is it the dose?
Correct, niacin is not the rate limiting factor and therefor will not increase NAD on it's own. Other precursors and intermediaries have been discussed in the past such as benaGene (Oxaloacetic Acid) http://www.longecity...-with-benagene/
Also check out the links in post 10 which discuss the same pathway involved in NAD.
I have looked at all the links on this thread. BenaGene had some good press but I didn't see any indication of results even close to those claimed by Sinclair. No 60yo changed their physiology to match that of a 20yo or anywhere near as far as I am aware. My understanding is that whatever Sinclair is doing, it is increasing NAD by significantly more than anything else to date. But then the problem is that this is not a new chemical so why was it not noticed before? Are you saying that Sinclair has some other compounds involved in this? I thought that the NMN was doing all the work in increasing NAD to high levels.
Edited by Michael, 30 July 2017 - 09:04 PM.
trim quote
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:35 AM
I have looked at all the links on this thread. BenaGene had some good press but I didn't see any indication of results even close to those claimed by Sinclair. No 60yo changed their physiology to match that of a 20yo or anywhere near as far as I am aware. My understanding is that whatever Sinclair is doing, it is increasing NAD by significantly more than anything else to date. But then the problem is that this is not a new chemical so why was it not noticed before? Are you saying that Sinclair has some other compounds involved in this? I thought that the NMN was doing all the work in increasing NAD to high levels.
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:41 AM
Flavonoid Apigenin [also Quercetin] Is an Inhibitor of the NAD+ase CD38
http://diabetes.diab.../62/4/1084.long
Relevant?
AMPK regulates energy expenditure by modulating NAD+ metabolism and SIRT1 activity
http://www.nature.co...ature07813.html
I know of several ways to improve AMPK activation. Relevant?
Edited by timar, 20 December 2013 - 12:44 AM.
Posted 20 December 2013 - 12:42 AM
AMPK regulates energy expenditure by modulating NAD+ metabolism and SIRT1 activity
http://www.nature.co...ature07813.html
I know of several ways to improve AMPK activation. Relevant?
Posted 20 December 2013 - 01:56 AM
Perhaps justification for...
http://nicotinamideriboside.org/
https://chromadex.co...nts/NIAGEN.html
http://www.resveratr...aging-pill/566/
Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:12 AM
Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:26 AM
Perhaps justification for...
http://nicotinamideriboside.org/
https://chromadex.co...nts/NIAGEN.html
http://www.resveratr...aging-pill/566/
Is this the same type of thing?
http://www.amazon.co...howViewpoints=1
Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:42 AM
I have looked at all the links on this thread. BenaGene had some good press but I didn't see any indication of results even close to those claimed by Sinclair. No 60yo changed their physiology to match that of a 20yo or anywhere near as far as I am aware. My understanding is that whatever Sinclair is doing, it is increasing NAD by significantly more than anything else to date. But then the problem is that this is not a new chemical so why was it not noticed before? Are you saying that Sinclair has some other compounds involved in this? I thought that the NMN was doing all the work in increasing NAD to high levels.
Probably one of the reasons Sinclair got the results he did with NMN that haven't apparently been duplicated with other substrates in the pathway such as Oxaloacetic Acid (benaGene) or Nicotinamide Riboside (Niagen) is more than likely because he was injecting massive quantities of NMN and thereby reaching in vivo concentrations that have been prior unachievable with oral doses of the other substrates (as oral dosing is all I've seen tested). I'm guessing the trick is achieving cell saturation of the substrates which more than likely isn't possible with oral dosing.
Edited by Michael, 30 July 2017 - 09:06 PM.
trim quotes
Posted 20 December 2013 - 02:43 AM
Edited by Ukko, 20 December 2013 - 02:54 AM.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users