I think the real information that arises from the statistics of genetics is a question that reads something like "how aught I to live happily to best serve myself and humanity given my genetic predisposition and what role do my genetics play in having a fulfilling and productive life?" I'm not military, but studying genetics has made the US Army's "Be all you can be" slogan feel like genius in simplicity. Speaking of novelty, now that we know the Army has it right, they need a symbol that looks as cool and novel as the one the Air Force has (saying stuff like that or thinking down on something because it lacks apparent novelty) would be an example of improper or unproductive use of the novelty gene). Just live it right, it's how we've survived and prospered. Live it wrong and you're into an unknown.
I do think that sifting through one's gene profile and reflecting on genetic predisposition grants a unique perspective and encourages self-honesty and self-improvement. I question the degree to which particular SNP's produce a significant effect on personality or behavior, though surely there are at least a handful that do.
I recall reading a study on the effects of the val/met COMT SNP on the subjective experience of pleasure. Those homozygous for the less active version (met/met) reported a dramatically greater feeling of pleasure than those with the more active version (val/val) in response to experiences normally deemed mildly pleasurable. Val/met people were somewhere in between. I am met/met and from early childhood have always had a pronounced pleasure response to the oddest little things. For example just listening to a voice that I find appealing can practically hypnotize me with pleasure. As can a gentle breeze, certain smells, etc. I wonder if this subjective experience is tied to my COMT SNP and consider it a gift if so.