I remember reading here that people were saying K2 MK7 was toxic in high doses (eg taking 1mg/day) It was part of the huge flame wars between which was better - MK4 and MK7
But this article here suggests otherwise.
http://www.ncbi.nlm....les/PMC3172146/
I take approx 120mcg per day from 'Natures Plus'. An article on Mercola suggets that if I take 8000IU of vitamin D I should be taking 800-1000mcg of K2
http://articles.merc...vitamin-k2.aspx
I am wondering how effective or necessary it is to take a dose that large. What bothers me about Mercola is how expensive his products usually are and how much money he makes to say and endorse the things he does. I believe his main motivation is financial on many things.
So he is recommending to take 8000IU of Vitamin D a day (I have no problem with that amount, I have 10000IU supplements which I take 1 several days a week). But then I am supposed to take 1mg K2 each time as well? That would at the very least cost a small fortune. Vitamin D3 is cheap. K2 is not. The other thing is Vitamin D3 hangs around the body far far longer than K2 anyway.
120mcg is much more K2 then anybody with a western style diet has any day. So is Mercola right that 1mg is the way to go, or should I be happy with my 120mcg dose per day regardless of my Vitamin D3 intake. I see he does sell Vitamin K2 and is priced pretty high compared with many other reputable and good quality brands. (His is probably one of them rebranded anyway).