Thanks for the list, robertp. I looked through these for evidence of shortcuts, and if you believe what they say, some would seem better than others--
● carbon60oliveoil says, "We produce C60 Fullerene olive oil exactly as prepared in the study."
● Bucky Labs gives their procedure, which is the same as in the original study.
● Vaughter Wellness says, "This is the exact same preparation as used in the original rat study. "
----------------------------------
● Good and Cheap says, "We use 99.9% Carbon 60 from SES, as we find the difference between 99.9% and 99.95% is negligible." Maybe so, but the higher level is "vacuum oven dried" and therefore free of toluene.
● RevGenetics does not provide any info on the procedure or C60 source, but has previously offered to dissolve C60 using a method that took just an hour or so--ie, not the method used in the original study.
● Life-Elixers C60 Oil claims to use 99.95% C60, but does not describe the procedure. The also say, "FDA approval pending," which seems unlikely.
● SES makes C60 and uses the highest quality and thus would seem to be the ideal supplier. However they do not give their procedure. Word is they are using a shortcut that may produce a different spectrum of adducts.
Edited by Turnbuckle, 18 January 2016 - 12:23 PM.
